LkWinnipesaukee
Member
I've been having an ongoing argument with an anti friend who is hell bent on the banning of metal bullets ("except for hunters"), and only allowing rubber bullets to be used for SD, HD, and target shooting/plinking.
He figures for the first 2, a rubber bullet will be a less than lethal alternative and still stop someone, and for the latter, that if someone has a ND at a range, a rubber bullet won't kill someone.
I don't really have anything to say other than "a rubber bullet wont stop a determined attacker", and that range accidents dont happen often enough to ban lead bullets.
Anyone have any other reasons for NOT banning metal bullets? Or any scientific proof or stats to back anything up?
Thanks
He figures for the first 2, a rubber bullet will be a less than lethal alternative and still stop someone, and for the latter, that if someone has a ND at a range, a rubber bullet won't kill someone.
I don't really have anything to say other than "a rubber bullet wont stop a determined attacker", and that range accidents dont happen often enough to ban lead bullets.
Anyone have any other reasons for NOT banning metal bullets? Or any scientific proof or stats to back anything up?
Thanks