maxcap9:
I could be wrong, but just reading posts on the subject of California qualified pistols it seems more and more firearm manufacturers are less inclined to get into the "dog and pony show" that is required to get a particular firearm certified in the wacko state.
California appears to continually change the rules of the game in that area, and constantly add new ones..
I think many times, especially in a firearm small enough to be practical for conceal carry, it's difficult to meet the stiff California requirements, the attitude of the folks who make the call as to what is and what is not OK for Kali are, for the most part, "anti-gun", and basically the whole process is costly, and a pain in the butt..
I should think at some point MOST manufacturers would simply refuse to sell any firearms in the state of California and maybe the "silent majority" of reasonable California "gun owners, or gun owner wannabe's" would vote the wackos out at the ballot box.
It "appears" to me, and I could be wrong, that the whole State of reasonable people is run by 3 "anti-everything normal types" in San Fran and you guys let them get away with it.
I know that's a simplification, but from this side of the U.S. it certainly appears that way.
I simply cannot believe there are more "anti"'s by count in California than there are supporters of the 2nd Amendment, but according to the results of every bit of legislation that comes out of California there must be.
Crap, don't mean to offend Kali folks, but every time I read anything coming out of California remotely involving firearms it's from the "anti's"..:banghead:
Best Wishes,
Jesse
