Ruger .44 carbine (Deerslayer) Should I?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Now I don't have one but it's a gas operated gun. It looks a little complicated to take apart and get back together but look may be deceiving. I'd love one of those but I think I'd rather have a Savage 99 or a Winchester 88...you know, for a somewhat unconventional rifle.
 
Here is one with the original fiber optic driven red dot sight - the Weaver Qwik Point. Very fast up to about 50 yards after which the 10 MOA dot covers a lot! These guns like 240 jacket ammo and like not so blunt bullet profiles.

Very Buck Rogers looking optic you have there!
 
Now I don't have one but it's a gas operated gun. It looks a little complicated to take apart and get back together but look may be deceiving. I'd love one of those but I think I'd rather have a Savage 99 or a Winchester 88...you know, for a somewhat unconventional rifle.
Yes, it is pretty straight forward semi-automatic gas operated rifle. Complete disassemble and reassemble for through cleaning is not at all a difficult of complicated process. I got my first one around '63 from a Lazarus department store my mom worked in, actually she bought it as I was 13 at the time. New, the rifle was about $120. I repaid my parents $30 a month for 4 months.

Now, the Deerfield Carbine is based on the Ranch Rifle design but uses a four round rotary magazine instead of the staggered box magazine of the Ranch rifle and Mini-14 rifles. The reason for this special magazine is the .44 Magnum's rimmed case. It is a totally different Ruger rifle.

The Ruger .44 carbine was originally called the Ruger Deerstalker, whose name was later changed to the .44 Carbine. Actually I think it was the first Ruger center fire rifle in production with the Model 77 line somewhere in the late 60s.

The rifle is a 100 yard rifle and does just fine and for those good and that can figure drop maybe a little more. I liked it because it was short and inside 100 yards excellent in heavy brush where I hunted deer in West Virginia. Follow up shots (when needed) were very easy with no lever to work.

The pictures I posted earlier were the Model .44 Carbine beside a Ruger 10/22. Pretty close in size. The tubular magazine below the barrel holds 4 rounds so you can load 1, chamber it and load 4 more for 5 rounds though I never bothered with more than 4. They do extremely well with 240 grain jacked bullets and I would never consider a 300 grain .44 Mag in one of mine.

Overall, I would jump on another if the price was right. You don't see them very often anymore. For a nice clean one I would give between $500 and $600 in a heartbeat as I like them that much. :)

Ron
 
funny you should mention this, but I'm meeting my buddy on Friday to check out his Ruger 44 carbine. He wants my Ipad 2 (64gb Verizon 3g model) and he's offering it up in trade. From what I've seen/read online it looks tempting but much like you I don't really need one. LOL not that it matters or will deter me. But I'm holding out judgement till I hold one in my hands.
 
Down in these parts if one shows up for sale it lasts about an hour at most. They bring $500-$600 all the time.

I had one of the original models that I bought used around 1973. Stovepiped every other round. Sent to Ruger and they overhauled it for no charge. After that it was totally reliable with factory loads and hand loads with JHP. It was stolen or I would still have it.
 
My point was that it isn't a high powered rifle, it is a rifle (carbine)that shoots a handgun round. And an expensive handgun round at that... Basically an expensive plinking gun.
Sorry but this makes no sense whatsoever. :confused:
 
They're pretty good carbines for medium range work out to approx 100 yards or so. Beyond this distance you should consider a rifle cartridge and not a revolver cartrisdge.

TR
 
If a revolver is good to at least 100yds, if not 125yds then the rifle will be useful to no less than 150yds.
 
I'll say this: I want one. It looks like a very handy rifle with a lot of short to medium-range stopping power. It's hard not to like something that's the same size as a 10/22 with that kind of power, and legendary Ruger reliability to back it up.
 
I've got a whole lot of different rifles to pick from when deer hunting season rolls around. But this year I took the Ruger .44 out with me. In the last ten years, it probably gotten the nod 50% of the time. Very light and handy. As was shown with that photo, a virtual twin to a 10/22. Mine is the later version with the box magazine. When I take it apart, it reminds me of an M1 Carbine more than anything else.

Never used more than one shot on a deer with this rifle. The second is always right there with me tracking the running deer in the scope. I have sort of an internal micro-debate on whether to fire again. About that time the deer falls over.

Gregg
 
When I bought mine (the newer Deerfield) I wasn't sure I'd use it much and bought it just because I liked the idea of a semiauto .44 carbine. It's been the deer rifle I've used the most ever since and the funny thing is I can't explain why. It just gets chosen over many other rifles again and again.

I'd buy a tube-fed older model in a heartbeat.
 
OMG, I have the same set up, with the Qwik-Point. I bought the gun in the '67-'68 era. It loves 240 gr Remington SJHP. Mine will hold under 2" at 50 yards.

They are a bit of a pain to detail strip, but rarely need it done. Mine has also put a number of deer in the freezer over the past almost 50 years.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top