Ruger - anti RKBA????

Status
Not open for further replies.
This company's founder testified before Congress for the assault weapons ban. Now that the ban is about to sunset, the company still holds its stance that they are willing to sell off the rights of their customers. Why should any of us want to support this company?

What evidence do you have for the second sentence? Is it that Ruger won't sell you a mag it refuses to make or will continue to refuse to make? The aftermarket will take care of that corporate quirk, which is probably only to honor the old man's sentiments.

Mr. Glock fired his top US exec, Paul Jannuzzo, only days after that 60 minutes interview. Apparently he got the message from the few thousand ticked off phone calls they got. It kind of gives you the impression that Jannuzzo was operating without the big cheese's ok. Of course he could have simply been the fall guy, but you'd think Jannuzzo would have come out about that. He could make more selling books about the "corruption of Glock Inc" than he ever could in some payoff to leave quietly.

Jannuzzo's firing may give you that impression, but I am not buying it. He remains a highly paid "consultant," therefore no dirt since he never really left. Hush money works. As an attorney I see it at work every day.

It remains then that no division executive in any business around as long as Glock has the authority to potentially jeopardize sales in their most important market without approval from world headquarters. Were I a betting man, I'd say that the BATFE project grew out of a similar desire for market promotion as did Ruger's flawed stance on the AWB. Feeling a little threatened by the late Clinton era lawsuits, Glock snuggled up with the enemy. They are more contemptible than Ruger IMO because at least Bill was open about his opinions while GG engineers a free pass by knifing Jannuzzo with a golden gag in his mouth. Suddenly, we are to believe that the Austrian master didn't know what his chief American lackey was up to in regards to the most dangerous governmental threat to their bottom line ever? Yeah, right. I am so absolutely convinced that Jannuzzo, as company spokesman, made it into the Congressional Record as supportive of ballistic fingerprinting without the Austrians ever chiming in on the issue.:rolleyes:
 
Boats:

Ruger was never really a part of that. Ruger, the company, does make the excellent SP-101, and I am glad they don't sell a metrosexual revolver when no one who owns one currently really shoots more than two cylinders out of them anyways before never shooting them again


Someone would have to be pretty damn-limp wristed not to be able to take more than 2 shots from a little hide-out revolver like the 12 oz. S&W 332. I've seen it described as "good for elderly women who suffer from osteoarthritis" :D
 
Boats:

Ruger was never really a part of that. Ruger, the company, does make the excellent SP-101, and I am glad they don't sell a metrosexual revolver when no one who owns one currently really shoots more than two cylinders out of them anyways before never shooting them again


Dang, someone would have to be pretty damn-limp wristed not to be able to take more than 2 shots from a little hide-out revolver like the 12 oz. S&W 332. I've seen it described as "good for elderly women who suffer from osteoarthritis" :D

The Lady Smiths are S&W's metrosexual revolvers, and only when carried by men, unless it's just to hold it for their wife or GF. :D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top