seattledave
Member
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2010
- Messages
- 34
I just purchased a Ruger LCR to replace an Armscor .38 snubby as my Fall/Winter ccw. I took it to the range this weekend and put 250 rounds through it, and, so far, I'm pretty pleased with the gun.
The trigger is on the heavy side, but smooth and I found it easy to adjust to. One of the biggest problems I have with any double action gun is getting consistent groups when shooting quickly. The trigger on this gun seems to make it a lot easier for me.
Also, for the light weight, it wasn't too punishing to shoot, even with +p ammo. Compared to a Smith 642 (a gun I have a lot of respect for) the LCR was A LOT more comfortable to shoot with the +p rounds. Others experience may vary, but after about 50 rounds with your typical Airweight my hands are ready to do something else, not so with the LCR.
I'll say one thing though, it isn't much in the looks dept., but in terms of being able to put rounds downrange quickly and accurately, I'd say Ruger has a winner in this little revolver.
The trigger is on the heavy side, but smooth and I found it easy to adjust to. One of the biggest problems I have with any double action gun is getting consistent groups when shooting quickly. The trigger on this gun seems to make it a lot easier for me.
Also, for the light weight, it wasn't too punishing to shoot, even with +p ammo. Compared to a Smith 642 (a gun I have a lot of respect for) the LCR was A LOT more comfortable to shoot with the +p rounds. Others experience may vary, but after about 50 rounds with your typical Airweight my hands are ready to do something else, not so with the LCR.
I'll say one thing though, it isn't much in the looks dept., but in terms of being able to put rounds downrange quickly and accurately, I'd say Ruger has a winner in this little revolver.