Ruger LCR in depth Review

Status
Not open for further replies.

NoleMan

Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2009
Messages
28
I was fortunante enough yesterday to try out a Ruger LCR. Since this is a new revolver, with a pretty groundbreaking design, I'll throw out what I thought of it:

Inital impressions - The first thing you'll notice when grabbing this gun is how light weight it is. I mean, it's super light! For anyone who is thinking about getting a CCW gun, but is opposed to carrying around a lot of weight, this gun would be ideal, coming in at a mere 13.5 ounces. One way Ruger acheived such a light weight, without using scandium, was by using polymer, a breakthrough in revolvers. The polymer has other benefits too, which I'll talk about later.

The next thing you'll probably notice about the LCR is the grip. Ruger really seemed to put some time into this grip design. Pictures can be somewhat deceiving when looking at the grip size of the LCR. When looking at pictures, it appears that Ruger put on a huge grip, to reduce perceived recoil. Quite the contrary, when you actually handle the gun, you'll find that the grip is very nicely sized. It's definitely not too big. The Hogue Tamer has nice stippling on the side, and on the backstrap has a cusioned gel insert.

One of the reasons the grip looks so big is due to the cylinder size. Ruger used a reinforced stainless cylinder (with some titanium inserted), where they "chiseled" out the area around where each round is placed...very good use of space. Ruger markets the cylinder as the "smallest .38 cylinder on the market." I believe it. It really is small. Again, for those looking to find a thin CCW, and prefer revolvers, this is a huge advantage.

You've got your little revolver loaded now, and you look downrange. Small revolvers are normally designed with horrid sights. I mean god awful! Fortunantely, Ruger seems to have done a decent job on the LCR's sights. The front blade is a little bigger than what most will be accustomed to on a S&W J-frame. Another thing I noticed, is the groove running down the spine of the gun seems to be a little deeper. These two features make the LCR's fixed sights pretty bearable.

So now you've grabbed the gun, held it, thought about it, loaded it, looked down the sights, and you're ready to shoot. You pull the trigger and the gun unexpectedly goes off. "What was that?" Revolvers are notorius for having a long, inconsisent pull, that is often staged. The Ruger LCR is honestly the smoothest trigger I have ever felt, out of the box, on any revolver. It feels a lot like a good semi-auto trigger. Ruger incorporated a cam design in the trigger system, to "smooth" it out." Ruger also used polymer in the trigger housing, which undoubtedly got rid of those nasty burrs most are used to on metal revolvers. The cam design and lack of burrs, makes this trigger ultra smooth.

You continue to shoot a box of .38 special downrange and you realize it isn't uncomfortable. Those of us who are accustomed to J-frames often find that putting a full box of .38 special ammo downrange can be somewhat taxing on the hand. It hurts! Ruger must have put some good R&D into the Hogue tamer grips, becuase they honestly make recoil, a non-issue, which is unheard of for a gun this small and light. Polymer, undoubtedly, also aids in reducing perceived recoil, as it "soaks" it up better than stainless steel.

Before giving you my final thoughts, I'd like to introduce some drawbacks to the LCR. The biggest drawback is finding a holster. I've been thinking about getting an LCR, and thus investigated holster options. My findings were that there is very little in the way of holsters. In time, this should change. As with any new gun, holsters are scarce. Another feature that Ruger incorporated, that I'm not a fan of, is they require the user to release the trigger fully forward, after firing a round, in order to fire the next round. If you're used to shooting your first round, releasing your trigger partially forward, and then pulling the trigger again, you'll get frustrated. This gun WILL NOT fire, unless the trigger is released fully forward.

Final thoughts - Ruger really made a big breakthrough with this gun. In my opinion, the LCR will revolutionize the snub nose market. Snub nose revolvers have some general drawbacks: cylinder width (makes it hard to conceal), recoil (ouch!), a bad trigger for a gun with a short sight radius (makes it hard to shoot accurately), low round capacity and awful sights. Ruger has addressed each of these issues, except round capacity, and designed a product that not only improves upon the drawbacks, of a snub nose, but basically solves the problems. If you're in the market for a high quality snub nose revolver, I would look no further than the LCR! I know I won't! When I can find one, I plan on buying it...maybe even two (one for me and one for the wife) . Hope this review helps some of those who are looking at the LCR.

Edit: Has a huge trigger guard, which doesn't "slap" your trigger finger, when firing. Much larger than S&W J frames

Edit Edit: "The American Rifleman" put 10,000 +P round through an LCR. Here is what they had to say "More than 10,000 rounds of .38
Spl. + P had been fired through the gun. It didn’t look or handle like a gun that had been torture tested or worn out. Everything worked, it shot straight, and it still locked up tight." That's pretty impressive!
 
Last edited:
Very nice review. I'm not a "latest and greatest" type, but I picked up an LCR and have not been at all disappointed. It is a great backup, and I've put several hundred trouble-free rounds through it. It will be used in a few revolver classes over the next few months, so it will get a good durability test between now and December.

Re: holsters, it is true that the most readily available ones (and the ones endorsed by Ruger) are the the $20-40, one-size-fits-all crap jobs. However, if you're looking for a premium holster for the LCR, Mike Taurisano (Tauris Holsters) is currently making holsters for it; his holsters are among the best in the business, and his ankle holster is probably the most comfortable and durable one out there (IMHO). I'm sure other holster makers are coming on board, but he's already at work making leather for the gun.

Thanks for taking the time to write this up.
 
Good info on the holsters tackleberi. I'll have to check it out.

One thing I failed to mention, is the LCR has a bigger trigger guard than the J frames, which is nice, because your trigger finger doesn't bang against it.
 
Thanks for the info. I have been looking into picking up a revolver for a carry piece and seriously considering the LCR. My only downside is that I shoot at the S&W performance center alot so I get considerable range time with their guns and I am partial to them.
 
Given that this gun fills an obvious niche, I'm sort of surprised that Ruger doesn't offer holsters.

They do for other odd-sized guns, like my 10 1/2" Super Blackhawk. These holsters are made by other well-known companies, but sold through Ruger with a Ruger logo on them.

By offering a few holsters (maybe IWB, OWB, SOB) when the gun was introduced, Ruger would have eliminated one of the only objections a buyer might have (other than retailers who charge $525 for the things).
 
The 525 price point is terrible. Stores around here have them at the most at 450. I have seen some incredible prices online though
 
Good write up. I'm not really in the snub market, have a good little Taurus 85SSUL that has a really good trigger. I'd thought the LCR kinda high priced at 475 at Academy, but I haven't been looking at many snubs. I gave 285 for my little 85 ultralite 13 years ago. A local gun shop had several in stock as I cruised the cases there today, NIB, $449.:what: So, I guess the little Ruger is in the ballpark after all. LOL Stuff is going up so fast, seems I can't keep up with it anymore. They were wanting $320 for a Kel Tec P3AT that I could have gotten for 100 bucks less a few years ago. *sigh*
 
I'm happy with my 340 M&P. As light as the Ruger with a tritium front sight and .357 capability. I carry 125gr Remington Golden Sabre loads as they're a good balance between power and comfort for me.

That said, I want to try an LCP. I like Ruger in general, and it seems like a terrific snubnose.
 
Just finished a range session today with my LCR. Trigger just keeps getting better. Haven't had a snubbie for the last 20 years, what was I thinking, but bought a 442 and the LCR since retiring from law enforcement. Believe I love the LCR more than the Smith. You are right about letting the trigger fully out. Got used to the semi auto trigger and just releasing it until it re-sets. You have to fully release the LCR trigger. Had a few skipped rounds until I remembered that. Last shots of the day were Speer Short-Barrel 135 +P's. Recoil was managable and shot point of aim.
 
thats pretty much why i bought it...

as for holsters ive found a few old open trigger types for j frames that have worked i have a leather one marked jay-pee that works well and an oddball uncle mikes No5 sidekick paddle style holster that im almost possative is disscontinued

i know desantis was making a pocket holster or has a previous model that works well

for the most part i just keep it in my pocket with a piece of leather i formed to be a makeshift pocket holster till i see something im willing to buy otherwise its on my hip with the jay-pee
 
What was that about "round count"? I read the manual and I don't recall any warnings about round counts, a la Kel Tec.

Edit: Check Kentucky Gun Company on Gunbroker. I got my LCR two weeks ago for $419, shipped - their "Buy Now" price. Since my LGS has 'em for $500 + 8.25% tax, I figured it was a smokin' deal.

Q
 
What was that about "round count"? I read the manual and I don't recall any warnings about round counts, a la Kel Tec.

I believe he was referencing capacity, i.e. it only holds five rounds. Not round count in the sense that you cannot shoot it a lot.
 
I hope so. He means "capacity" more than "round count," which I - obviously - took to mean gun's life expectancy.

FWIW, the speedloaders that fit the Sp101 also fit the LCR.

Also, it appears that they used the very usable sight pattern from the Sp101 when making the sights for the LCR. Good call, Ruger!

Q
 
I got my LCR and two different people have each gone and bought one after shooting it. A third has expressed a serious interest in one and I suspect when finances permit will pick one up as well.

It is built to be a lightweight CCW revolver and I think it fills that role rather well. At around $400 I think it is a good buy. I now really want a revolver like the sp101 but with a trigger pull of the LCR.
 
I see no reason why you couldn't, peyton. There is a screw on the bottom of the grip, if memory serves me correctly, that needs to be undone. Once undone, you can slip the grip off and change it. Finding aftermarket grips could potentially be an issue, since the LCR is a newer design.

Quoheleth, I mean round capacity as opposed to round count. Sorry about that. Slight typo. BTW, "the american rifleman" said they put 10,000 +P rounds through an LCR and it still fired as good as the day it was bought new. Pretty impressive!
 
Finding aftermarket grips could potentially be an issue, since the LCR is a newer design.

A year or two and all the grip companies will have models for it. It bolts on such that Hogue won't even need to design a mounting stirrup for it.

I love Ruger's barrel design on this gun, not screwed on like most, but cast shroud integral with the frame and the barrel screwed into the frame. Seems to me, there'll be less sight alignment problems with this design since so many Smiths and Tauri and others seem to get their barrel over torqued and they'll shoot slightly off in windage. Seems a stronger design, too, in the Ruger tradition.
 
Quoheleth, I mean round capacity as opposed to round count. Sorry about that. Slight typo. BTW, "the american rifleman" said they put 10,000 +P rounds through an LCR and it still fired as good as the day it was bought new. Pretty impressive!

Whew!

BTW, that's 2000 reloads (open cylinder, dump, put in fresh cartridges, close). Not only the successful firing of 10,000 rounds, but 2000 reload cycles tells you something about the nature of this gun.

Q
 
The LCR is the only gun I carry. I like it for the light weight and the trigger pull is so smooth. The lock is inside the grips (out of sight out of mind). The trigger guard is a little oversized, so I modified an Uncle Mike's pocket holster for carry. I typically put it in my Smart Carry.
 
Great review.

I really like my LCR and hope that by adding a set of Crimson Trace laser grips it will take my 340PD's place in my pocket.

IMG_4050.jpg
 
Funky little gun.

I recently handled one as I was asked to make a custom holster for it (see aforementioned holster shortage) for a local gunshop owner. It weighs nuthin'! It's quite slim and tucks in really unobtrusively even on a belt.

The holster came out nice too, molded for the Crimson Trace model.
It's an easy gun to make a pancake for because it's so slim and the barrel is stubby.

lousy cell picture in flourescent lighting...
lefty, forward cant, 1.5" belt slots, mahogany dye, OWB, LCR-CT:

IMG00501-cropped.jpg



-Daizee
 
Nice Review!

I will add that the cylinder chambers are very nice and smooth. Extraction of the spent cases is a breeze as is cleaning.
 
I rented one of these at my range this morning and really enjoyed it. I also shot really well -- especially considering it was only the third time I'd been to the range! Narrowing down my choices for what I want to purchase and the Ruger LCR is currently top on the list.

Meesh
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top