Ruger Mark 3 or .22lr SP101 ?

[CajunBass]

-difficult maintenance/takedown

This is one of the biggest myths of the internet age. It's only difficult to do it you're too stupid, or too lazy to read the directions and follow them. I know, because I was both then I got mine. After getting it locked up tight, not once, but twice, I figured out that the guy who designed it, built it, and literally wrote the book on it, knew more than I did, I read and followed the directions and what do you know, they work. Who'd have thunk it? FOLLOW THEM. That's the key.

I'd get the MK III or any other "Mark" I could find if I wanted the best "bang for the buck." The 22/45 I had was scarey accurate. It made me look like I knew what I was doing. I did eventually sell it, but only because I started to specialize in Smith & Wesson revolvers, but that little Ruger would shoot.

The SP101 looks nice, but I'd rather have (and do) a Model 18 Smith & Wesson. YMMV.

 

[default57]

No doub, the Mark is easy to take down as has been made very clear hahaha. But I think it sufficeth me to say, with my limited firearm knowledge, that any revolver is easier to clean and, at that, is a simpler animal altogether than the Mark.

Do yall think the SP 101 is more accurate? or easier to shoot accurately?
I know its as accurate as the shooter and it also depends on my preference.