au_prospector
Member
Okay I am in the market for a Ruger Single Six .22 / mag convertible.
I walk into one of my favorite local gun stores and ask as to the price of a 6.5 inch stainless new revolver. My friend checks his computer and says he can order me one for $450, which I recognize is a more than fair price.
Then he says he has an older one in the case and pulls it out. Original box, both cylinders, and original manual. It is priced at $500. I make a mental note that the first two serial numbers are 15. I also note this is a three screw gun and has not been back to Ruger for the safety transfer bar attachment. After checking the Ruger website, I believe this gun to be made in 1960. It is a really nice looking gun. The action sounded good. The wood grips were in good shape. There is holster wear on the blueing at he muzzle and on the frame behind the cylinder opposite from the gate. (about 25% left in these areas) No rust, scratches or nicks. Rest of the original blue in great shape. Adjustable rear sight.
So heck, assuming I cannot afford both without my wife throwing me out of the house. Which one should I get? I wanted a new stainless, but am intrigued with the 1960 version as a bit of history. I do however want a shooter. I assume the the older gun is solid enough for a dozen range trips per year?
Any input is appreciated.
Thanks!
I walk into one of my favorite local gun stores and ask as to the price of a 6.5 inch stainless new revolver. My friend checks his computer and says he can order me one for $450, which I recognize is a more than fair price.
Then he says he has an older one in the case and pulls it out. Original box, both cylinders, and original manual. It is priced at $500. I make a mental note that the first two serial numbers are 15. I also note this is a three screw gun and has not been back to Ruger for the safety transfer bar attachment. After checking the Ruger website, I believe this gun to be made in 1960. It is a really nice looking gun. The action sounded good. The wood grips were in good shape. There is holster wear on the blueing at he muzzle and on the frame behind the cylinder opposite from the gate. (about 25% left in these areas) No rust, scratches or nicks. Rest of the original blue in great shape. Adjustable rear sight.
So heck, assuming I cannot afford both without my wife throwing me out of the house. Which one should I get? I wanted a new stainless, but am intrigued with the 1960 version as a bit of history. I do however want a shooter. I assume the the older gun is solid enough for a dozen range trips per year?
Any input is appreciated.
Thanks!