S&W 642 vs. Colt Night Cobra in 38 Spl?

[9mmepiphany]

Seems like overlap of my SP-101, though

Well...it is smaller, carries 6 rounds, has better sights, and a better trigger.

It was designed as a optimized Colt Detective Special for CCW in a more versatile chambering

 

[SwampWolf]

Colt hasn't come out with anything lightweight that would compete directly against the 642.

But they once did; the almost perfect revolver for concealed carry chambered in .38 Special-the long discontinued original Cobra/Agent models. Virtually the same size and weight of an alloy-framed Smith J-frame revolver but having one more round on board. Used ones in good condition are relatively pricey now but well worth the cost in my opinion.

 

[Autodidactic]

Looking at these two, possibly may pick one up as a CCW.

I already have a Ruger SP-101 in .357 and the 3" barrel. With this next gun, I'd be looking to add something a bit smaller, with a no-snag DAO and chambered in 38+P. (don't want the longer cylinder or .357 capability here)

What does the Colt have to justify the extra 50% ($300) in cost? Better DA trigger or just the brand name? It looks like maybe a little bigger gun, as it has room for the pinky on that bottom corner of the grip. If so, what is the equivalent S&W?

What led to this was I watched a Paul Harrel video in which he compared small & medium 38 revolvers with small & medium 9 mm pistols. He made some strong points on how a revolver may be more reliable in a real-world SHTF scenario, especially if the user doesn't have great technique or a lot of practice. (thinking of my wife here)

Other thoughts?

Thanks!

Main thing is the 642 is a lot lighter. Both will function well. I have a 642. I like it. The Colt allows single action.

A better comparison is a Colt Cobra versus a Smith 637. The 637 is identical to the 642 but has an exposed hammer for single action like the Cobra.