My wife is joining a company I work for that does some investigation, personal protection and recovery work. She will just be doing some cheating spouses and verification work on the side, but she will need to qualify with a firearm under the states lethal weapons training act. I was going to get her a compact semi auto of some sort, but she cant rack the slides very well in anything we tried, and she really likes the no nonsense always ready revolver. She has made it very clear that she is sacrifice the extra rounds of a semi auto for a revolver that it always goes bang when she pulls the trigger and wont jam, and there is definitely someting to be said for that.
She really likes my BUG S&W 640 PD, and I was thinking of getting her a more heavyweight model, but my main concern is that the 640 and 649 have no real rear sight, and it really makes aiming an issue. The 686 has great sights, but there is an external hammer, which I never liked for carry use. She will use a 357, but have it chambered in 38 so the recoil of the small revolver really shouldnt be an issue, and if she ever wants to move up, it elliminates the need to buy a new gun. Any opinions on the lesser of the two evils between crappy sites or a hammer?
649
686
She really likes my BUG S&W 640 PD, and I was thinking of getting her a more heavyweight model, but my main concern is that the 640 and 649 have no real rear sight, and it really makes aiming an issue. The 686 has great sights, but there is an external hammer, which I never liked for carry use. She will use a 357, but have it chambered in 38 so the recoil of the small revolver really shouldnt be an issue, and if she ever wants to move up, it elliminates the need to buy a new gun. Any opinions on the lesser of the two evils between crappy sites or a hammer?
649
686