S&W 686 versus Ruger GP100

[JohnKSa]

It is obvious that there's more steel around the cylinder, when you look at the picture in post #27

And yet they'll fit in the same holster...

There may be more metal in important parts of the gun, but if that can be done without increasing the weight or bulk of the gun, then what's the downside?

The post I responded to implied that there was a significant difference in the size (slimness) of the two guns and that's what accounted for the Ruger's strength. The fact is that while there may be more metal in certain critical areas that contribute to the strength of the Ruger design, the overall size, shape and weight of the two guns are virtually identical.

In other words, the Ruger is stronger because it's a stronger design, not because it's larger, thicker or heavier.

 

[AKElroy]

I currently own a 686 6", and I formerly owned an sp 101. I have never owned the specific model you mention, but I have fired one.

The Ruger is overbuilt compared to the Smith, which I like, but the OEM trigger is horrendous. The Smith is simply the best shooting centerfire handgun I own, or have ever owned. And I have owned more than I can easily count. The Ruger? Not so much. Love my Blackhawk, though, just not a double action Ruger fan.

 

[Confederate]

A "lemon" typically refers to a product that can't be fixed, or that a company won't fix it. Both companies can produce lemons and both will fix them, so no issue there. If you're buying the gun locally, take six .357 bullets (jacketed) and drop one into each chamber. The more accurate guns will catch the bullets and will not let them pass. This indicates good chamber throat size.

Generally, the 686 rivals even the renowned Colt Python (at least the first generation did). The Rugers are no slouches at accuracy, though the 686s have the edge. You can't go wrong with either gun. If you can get a 686 with a tapered barrel, you might like that better -- I'm not a big fan of underlugs in barrels longer than 4-5 inches.

I have a 6-inch 686 and a 6-inch Ruger Security-Six, and much prefer the Ruger. I'm not a huge fan of the GP-100, though.







.

 

[jem375]

Having owned a 681, 686, and a 4" GP100, I sold the 2 Smiths and kept the Ruger.... the Ruger is a very accurate handgun also ...

 

[atlanticfire]

I can appreciate both. The smith for the superb craftsmanship, fine finish and excellent trigger. And the Ruger for its robust build, nice weight and ability to digest full house 357 for its whole life without a hiccup. That being said my only 357 is a Security Six.

 

[tango2echo]

I have owned both (several 686's) and still own several GP-100's. Accuracy is very good with both. The Smith is "smoother". The trigger on the GP is easier to get crisp and light with a spring swap. IME, the GP shoots light to medium bullets better and the Smith shoots 158gr and up better. The GP is a stronger gun and more forgiving. My choice is the GP. I am contemplating buying a fourth GP, which is half the price of a new Smith.

t2e