S&W 686 vs. 686 Plus

I don't really care about the six or seven shots, but when I buy another 686, it's not going to have a lock on it, just like the two others I've had over the years.
 
With experience with ~20 Smiths over the years, I've not had any problems with the four that had IL's. While I fault S&W for buckling to the political pressure that led to the IL, I've found that after a month or two, that I no longer noticed it.

As an aside, the triggers on the lock models are as good in SA use as the previous models, but the DA mode is a bit heavier by a pound or two. Accuracy is indistinguishable between types. YMMv, Rod
 
It's pretty simple:

If you expect to carry a 686 as a defensive tool, go with the maximum capacity available.

If buying a revolver for competition, choose a version that complies with your game's rules.

If you are buying a range toy, choose whichever capacity you wish. It won't really matter.
 
Double Action Revolver shooting doesn't come naturally to me.

I rarely shoot Double Action out of a revolver. However when I do and am practicing, I will stage the trigger for the 1st couple cylinders full till I get the hang of the DA trigger, again.

Meaning I pull through the 1st portion of the DA trigger, pause / re-obtain a perfect sight picture, and then pull through the rest of the trigger firing the revolver. I find staging a DA trigger is easier to do with a 6 shot revolver vs a 5 shot (snub) or 7 shot revolver.

A 686 or 686 Plus is on my list to buy, when the right priced used one presents itself. A friend of mine has the 686 Plus and it is a nice gun. I do like having that extra round in the cylinder.
 
Back
Top