Crowman
Member
There's no comparison between Ruger and S&W these days. Ruger's GP-100 models are boat anchors in my view. They whacked off some steel from the grip, added it to the barrel and ruined the balance of the guns. The SP-101s are fine, and some people can get used to the balance of a bad gun just like they can get used to the balance of a bad knife. The 686s are just heavy, but their balance is fine. I just wish one could opt for lighter guns. The old Model 66 is ideal (if you can get one of the new release models). And if you can find an old Security-Six Ruger, you're always going to be better off than with a GP-100. What happens is they beefed up a gun that didn't need to be beefed up. Some people say, "Well, there's less recoil." Yes, so let's add another eight ounces and reduce it even more! No one ever complained that the old 66 and Security-Sixes were too light. They said the 66/19s were not durable.
Many people hike, hunt, fish and camp, and they don't want the extra weight in guns that only shine at the range.
You pay for it, but the GP100 Match Champion is a whole different animal...no heavy front lug (milled off at extractor rod housing), barrel sides milled flat, melted cylinder, shimmed hammer and trigger (both centered in frame), factory tuned action, weighs about the same as my 4-1/4" barrel L-frame S&W Model 69 (MC has a better trigger) and balances well in the hand. Also fits the same holster. The MC comes with pretty wood grips, but I prefer Pachmayr Diamond Pro's. Fit my hand better. This baby is also a shooter. For me, POI coincides spot-on with POA using158 grain full house magnums. 180 grain cast FP print just a bit high.
Ruger got this one right.