armoredman
Member
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/sa...sial-gun-owners-liability-insurance-residents
San Jose CA now requires both firearms "insurance" and an annual "fee" to exercise their rights.
The level of (censored) in this statement alone is incredible.
Now, how can this be countered? Curious what gun rights group will pick this one up.
San Jose CA now requires both firearms "insurance" and an annual "fee" to exercise their rights.
The level of (censored) in this statement alone is incredible.
"While gun rights advocates argue that gun owners should not have to pay a fee to exercise their constitutional right to bear arms," Liccardo said, via the report, the "2nd Amendment does not require the taxpayers to subsidize folks to own guns."
Now, how can this be countered? Curious what gun rights group will pick this one up.