Savage 10FP review..sorry no pics

Status
Not open for further replies.

Redlg155

Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2002
Messages
2,725
Location
NW Florida
Fellow Shooters,

As an early part of my Christmas present my lovely wife allowed me to play with my newest toy, a Savage Tactical 10fp in .308 w/20" barrel. As with most of my rifle choices, and I say most in part due to some crazy impulse buys here and there, I had done a fair bit of research and to a certain degree I knew what to expect.

Upon unpacking the rifle I found that it had a finish that looked like a cross between powder coat and parkerizing, close to, but not quite the same type of finish found on a Remington 870 express. Traditional styrofoam packaging had been discarded in favor of an egg crate type of material. As this was an accutrigger model, an adjustment key was provided as well as tons of unneeded papers and of course...the silly lock. Now..as they say, here is the "nitty gritty".

Action and Function.

Action and function was flawless, with rounds chambering and extracting without difficulty. One note to be had is that you must make sure the rounds are completely seated in the internal magazine prior to chambering a round. I had a couple inadverdently pop out of the magazine when I tried to chamber a round due to my attemting to load left handed into the ejection port. This problem was alleviated when I paid more attention to loading the magazine. The feel of the bolt it as I worked it back and forth was tolerable, albeit a bit gritty in feel. I suspect that things will smooth out once the bolt wears on the rails. The 10fp is also a short action rifle. I'm glad Savage went this way instead of relying on a long action and spacer.

Safety.

The safety is a teardrop style that works in three positions. Full safe (no bolt movement), Safe (but able to load and unload) and Fire. Although many shooters are fans of a safety placed on the trigger guard, I am not. The savage safety is where is should be, located at the top rear of the reciever where it is easily accessible to both left and right handed shooters. I find it interesting that two of the most value priced gun brands in the marketplace, Mossburg and Savage, both have this feature.

Barrel and overall feel.

The barrel is a 20" heavy barrel complete with the standard proof/manufacturer marks. The target crown is recessed to protect it from damage. Shouldering the rifle made for a slightly forward point of balance, even with the 20" barrel. This is due to a combination of heavy barrel and lighweight stock. Stock dimensions were ok with no real gripes or complaints.

Trigger.

What can I say...amazing! Although I did not have a trigger scale available, I suspect the trigger was set at the factory in the 3 pound range. Trigger release was crisp with no percievable overtravel. The safety lever reminded me of shooting a two stage trigger, a takeup followed by a definite wall before the trigger breaks. Prior to the range session I did a bit of experimenting with the trigger to verify some complaints that I had heard in various forums concerning unintentionally "decocking" the trigger. If I pulled the trigger without activating the trigger bar, yes, the trigger would in essensce "decock". However, if I pulled the trigger with full contact on the trigger face, I had zero problems.

Stock...I saved the worse for last.

Hmmm...how can I say it politely. I'll just cut to the chase and say that the stock, for the lack of a better term, SUCKS! The stock had a good bit of flex and had an uneven spacing on each side of the barrel. Molding marks on the stock made it very obvious that the same mold was used for detatchable/floorplate magazine models. It's a shame that a $500 rifle came with such a sorry excuse for a stock. I take it that Savage really doesn't care since most users either replace the stock or order the rifle with the Chaote, McMillan or HS Precision stocks. One positive note..you will soon see a Savage stock in the EE section. Cheap!:D Is the stock functional? Yes. Is the rifle accurate with the factory stock? Yes. So why change the stock? A good question that can only be answered by handling the rifle.


Shooting Time!

I went ahead and purchased some Weaver 2pc bases and although these worked fine, they will be replaced soon by a Ken Farrell 1 pc mount. Weaver Grand Slam rings and Leupold VXII 3-9x40mm as well as a Harris Bipod completed the accessory setup. Everything seemed to be rock solid except for one little problem (unrelated to the accessories) that crept up later in the shooting session.

A mix of ammo was fired ranging from various Milsurp ammo (SA and Port Surplus) to 180gr Winchester Factory loads. All loads grouped very well, with the milsurp averaging 1 1/2 inches and quite a few groups even smaller. All loads also stayed within minute of bowling pin at 300 yards and I found that with a 1" high zero at 100 I could engage bowling pins at 300 by holding at the top of the pin. Remington 150grain Spt ammo took honors by giving me a five shot group that could be covered by a nickel at 100 yards. I don't know if the 180 grain Winchester kicked that much more or that I was sore by the time I tested it, but OW! did it hurt. I know...wuss. However, in all I fired approximately 200 rounds during the session before trying the 180gr load. Also, no reliability problems were noted except as previously mentioned and accreddited to user error.

Now back to the problem I had mentioned previously. I would fire three to four shots and then get a horribble flyer. Try again and the second shot was the flyer. I checked the scope and the mounts and no problems were noted. but when I grabbed the barrel I found that the action was loose in the stock! The rear mount screw was loose and after some tightening, my flyer problems were solved. So lesson learned...always check the stock before firing a new gun.

So, did Savage come out with a winner? Yes and No. Yes in the performance department. She's butt ugly, but pretty in a glock kinda way. No in the factory cheapo stock department.

I've decided to overlook the stock and if I can't sell it on EE, I'll make it into a jello mold. Other than that.. 1 and 1/2 thumbs up. She's a keeper.

Good Shooting
Red
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the great review...

i just placed an order for the HS presicion 10fp today. I have almost no experience with Savage rifles...but this one beat out the Remington 700pss in most categories (Barrel length/twist, price, hs stock, and I think its a GREAT looking rifle).
Im curious if youve noted any fowling issues? I hear that new savages are prone to this...I may load up some of those abraisive bullets.
I have heard that 2 piece bases give you a little more room to load as they are top loading only, is there a reason you will be changing?
Thanks for the posting and if you get the chance, get some pics up!
 
I don't know if the 180 grain Winchester kicked that much more or that I was sore by the time I tested it, but OW! did it hurt. I know...wuss. However, in all I fired approximately 200 rounds during the session before trying the 180gr load.

Good grief man! I think 200 rounds with a .308 would be quite a feat for a lot of shooters for their first time out with a new rifle! Nice report - I agree about the plastic stock. I bought my first Savage a few months ago , a stainless 12BVSS in .223 with a laminated stock.

i just placed an order for the HS presicion 10fp today.

If I get a .308 again this might be the same model I get. Or I could just get a .308 barrel and bolt head and convert my .223.
 
I own a 10FP-LE2 in .308 which has the 26" barrel. I've noticed that it does foul however the fouling has not detracted from accuracy. The abrasive bullets are a hugely bad idea. I was interested in them until I learned that nearly all of the abrasive action takes place in the throat and that in effect you are moving the throat back. The time tested polishing grit on a tight patched jag actually does improve bore fouling. I've used J.B. Non embedding Bore Paste with some success. More importantly the traditional method of bore lapping doesn't move the throat! Plus and this is significant, you're firing a COPPER jacketed bullet with grit embedded in it. So in effect you're pressing abrasive fouling into your chamber throat in an attempt to PREVENT fouling! As for the clearance between the scope and the loading port, I'd have to say that I used the lowest two piece mounts that'd work for my scope. That said, the one piece mounts were cut away to allow for more clearance at the port. I really can't imagine that the difference between the two piece and the one piece mounts would have any effect on ease of loading.
 
How do those bullets only affect the throat? Is the abrasive compound worn away in just the first few inches? If its actually bad I will just hand lap the barrel.
Is there any advantage to a one peice base verses a two piece?
Thanks for the info.
 
http://www.perfectunion.com/vb/showthread.php?t=51630

I used Tubbs' final finish on mine, really made an improvement! Better accuracy. From ave 5/rd groups .5moa to less than .3 moa at 200yds! Easier cleaning! I didn't use the first two coarsest grade bullets.. just enough to clean things up alot. May have lost some barrel life rounds.. But I think it IS worth it! Less chance of messin up the throat or muzzle while cleaning. which most barrel smith's think is the number one reason why good tubes go bad!:what: The Savage line is and has been one of the ( in my opinion ) best buys in the gun world! Buy em.. shoot em.. never let them collect dust!
As for the one piece vs two piece base.. I would ( If you were going for accuracy ) opt. for the one piece base. The more rigid you make the action ( don't forget you are bolting on a good size piece of metal ) the better the accuracy should be. Why do you think benchresters most always use a single shot action.... no cut out for the magizine. More rigid!
 
Davo,

I have heard that 2 piece bases give you a little more room to load as they are top loading only, is there a reason you will be changing?

I had originally went with the two piece mount because that's all Wallyworld (Aka Wal-Mart) had in stock at that time. The main reason that I will be changing is that I want a little more leeway in ring spacing. I've considered the Trijicon Tripower scope if the expected funds come my way. That individual scope would necessitate a 1pc base. If you look at the picture posted by Robctwo you can see where there isn't much room to adjust for eye relief and varying scope lengths. My Leupold VXII looks almost the same way mounted, and that's with a short action. Actually, his looks almost exactly like mine.

The other reasons to go to a one pc vs a two is that you will have one solid structure to mount your scope on instead of two independent parts. You also have the option of mounting a 15 or 20 MOA mount for longer range shooting.

I'm looking at ordering these from http://www.kenfarrell.com/. The Badger bases are nice..but a little too spendy for me.

As for fouling, I did not have any problems. Initially I cleaned after every shot with breakfree and a good brush, followed by a patch. I then went to every three shots for the next 20. After that I cleaned after every 20 shots, so I did not give it a chance to build up any real fouling.

I also forgot to mention that I tried some Wolf ammo during the test. This was the alloy type casing with red laquer sealant instead of the Wolf Gold brass cased ammo. After three rounds I quit using the stuff because I was concerned about the laquer gumming up my chamber as well as the case necks having powder residue left from firing on them. It looked as though the casings did not expand 100 percent to seal the chamber and had a little gas come back. Anyway..from now on I'll stick to using the Wolf in autoloaders.
 
Last edited:
Savage 10FP

Check out SavageShooters.net Its a great site with lots of information about Savage guns. The shooters there are also helpful in answering questions.

I found a used, but like new, VLP laminated stock to put on my 10FP in 223 and love it. Also got a Stevens 200 in 223, with 1 in 9" twist, for a light carry around rifle. Will also be upgrading the stock on it also.
 
I have a 12BVSS-S .308 with a barrel full of tool marks and fouling.
I went through the Tubb Final Finish kit and it now fouls less and cleans easier. Unfortunately, it did not help the accuracy which is not up to Brianc's report. It was OK for a while, about .7 MOA, but now the NRA has cut the scoring rings on the F-class targets in half so I have a Pac-nor on order.

Of the three of us here who bought Savages about the same time, the guy with the 10FP got the best deal. He has the smoothest, most accurate barrel, and the only Accutrigger that works as advertised.
 
Of the three of us here who bought Savages about the same time, the guy with the 10FP got the best deal. He has the smoothest, most accurate barrel, and the only Accutrigger that works as advertised.
Did your accutrigger not work as stated? Im wondering what your actual trigger pull range ended up being.
 
Nice review :)

I have a model 12, pre-accutrigger, in .223 with the heavy stainless fluted barrel and the laminated factory stock. Great rifle.

I recently picked up a model 93 in .17hmr with the heavy blued barrel, accutrigger, and the cheap plastic stock. Loved the rifle, absolutely could not stand the stock.

I shot it one time, and traded it in for the same model with a laminated thumbhole stock. The stock came with the rifle, but it's not one that savage shows in their catalog... the laminated stock has multi-colored wood, primarily reds and grays. Man, is that thing nice :)

I'd have a hard time not looking at a savage for any bolt action gun I was interested in from this point forward, but their cheap plastic stocks are not even worth considering.
 
they're good rifles, but i agree on the stock. i bought mine because of the cheapo stock. i immediately dressed it up with a boyd's target stock. much better now.
 
Out to the range again today. My elk trip fell apart and I have a few days off, so might as well shoot.

I cleaned up the gun last night, including a foam out of the barrel and full cleaning. Took the stock off and reset the trigger to a bit heavier. Seemed to eliminate the decocking. At the range today in the fog. First five were in the upper left. Didn't even bother with looking at the spotting scope. Just throwing lead down range as best I could see.

IMG_2675.gif

This is what I was shooting

IMG_2682.gif

I plan on loading up some better bullets. I have some Hornady 150 SST Interlocks that have been very accurate, and some 168 gr Molly coated HP.

I might also put together some of the 110 gr SP. Will try some full and some reduced loads. Using a shooting pad and insulated leather jacket today and felt no pain at all.
 
Last edited:
For some reason I'm not seeing the edit. I added that the trigger problem surfaced at the range again today. I'll take another turn off the trigger. I hate to lose the lightest settings, but hate the gun not functioning worse.
 
Last edited:
10fp

I have a 10fp in 308 and its hands down a awesome rifle!
they like heavier grain ammo.
180 is to much...
They are cherry with 168gr match and 175gr match ammo (I find 168 better)
I can shoot the basically same holes all day pretty much around .3-.4 inch groups. black hills match ammo seems to be the best value with accurracy.
When I want cheap I just use WWB 150 Gr and I get around 1 inch groups maybe .8 sometimes.

And yes the cheap savage stock does suck big time. Id recommend the Bell and Carlson Duramaxx stock its around 90 bucks and has a great solid feel and look.
makes it a complete new rifle! plus the groups may get a little bit tighter because the cheapo stock that comes with it is known to flex when it fires.
the duramaxx stock I say is on par with the stock that comes with the rem 700pss if you have ever handled one. Trust me you wont be disapointed!
Cabelas has them thats where I got mine.
or if you want something a little nicer then go with a McMillen or a HS persision or check out the Bell and Carlson Medalist stock which is cheaper then the HS or the McMillen

heres a pic of the duramaxx stock on a 12fv
savblackwhitesmall.jpg
 
10fp

I have a 10fp in 308 and its hands down a awesome rifle!
they like heavier grain ammo.
180 is to much...
They are cherry with 168gr match and 175gr match ammo (I find 168 better)
I can shoot the basically same holes all day pretty much around .3-.4 inch groups. black hills match ammo seems to be the best value with accurracy.
When I want cheap I just use WWB 150 Gr and I get around 1 inch groups maybe .8 sometimes.

And yes the cheap savage stock does suck big time. Id recommend the Bell and Carlson Duramaxx stock its around 90 bucks and has a great solid feel and look.
makes it a complete new rifle! plus the groups may get a little bit tighter because the cheapo stock that comes with it is known to flex when it fires.
the duramaxx stock I say is on par with the stock that comes with the rem 700pss if you have ever handled one. Trust me you wont be disapointed!
Cabelas has them thats where I got mine.
or if you want something a little nicer then go with a McMillen or a HS persision or check out the Bell and Carlson Medalist stock which is cheaper then the HS or the McMillen

heres a pic of the duramaxx stock on a 12fv
savblackwhitesmall.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top