School security guard gets probation in shooting case

Status
Not open for further replies.

Drizzt

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Messages
2,647
Location
Moscow on the Colorado, TX
Tulsa World


January 31, 2003 Friday Final Home Edition

SECTION: NEWS; Tulsa; Pg. A13

LENGTH: 307 words

HEADLINE: School security guard gets probation in shooting case

BYLINE: BILL BRAUN World Staff Writer

BODY:
A school security guard who was involved in a shooting on Tulsa school property was placed on one year of probation Thursday.

Ronald Lee Littles Jr., 25, pleaded no contest to recklessly handling a firearm -- a misdemeanor.

The deferred sentence granted by Tulsa County Special Judge Millie Otey means Littles can have the case dismissed with no conviction if he completes his probation. Otey ordered Littles to pay $250 to the court fund plus $125 to the victims compensation fund.

He can still work as a security guard during his probation, although not at the Tulsa High School for Science and Technology.

Littles was on duty and working for Burns International Security Services Corp. when he fired a shot at Jermaine Cox, an 18-year-old suspended student, on Oct. 31 outside Tulsa Science High, 4929 N. Peoria Ave., according to reports.

During a confrontation, Littles saw Cox begin "to pull what he believed to be a silver semiautomatic handgun from the front of his sweatshirt pocket," and he fired while "fearing for his life," a police detective reported.

Police never found a weapon in Cox's possession, and Cox reportedly has denied threatening Littles.

The shot missed Cox and ricocheted, and a projectile struck a cell phone in the pants pocket of a 15-year-old student who was about 200 feet away.

Shrapnel from the collision with the cell phone left the 15-year-old with a graze injury to his face, police reported.

As a probation condition, Littles must meet and maintain certain educational and training standards if he continues to work as a security guard.

Unrelated to this episode, Cox is in the Tulsa Jail and charged with three counts of robbery by force or fear.
 
As I recall, not only did he miss, but he missed by a mile. What a doofus.
 
uhmm, but back to basics, huh?

We've a licensed, armed & proven "dufus" "running amok" on our chillrens' schools & we do what? - allow him free-wheelin', albeit "only" amongst our populace (thank God it's not at a school!) access ... & why?

That Cox goes to jail on an "unrelated" has no bearing on Our Gent's shooting skill set.

According to the report (& I'm in no way a fave-fan of these things till it all washes out), said wild-eye Protector shot at a guy not holding a weapon/non-threatening & was subsequently scooted off-school to "protect" the rest of us?

Said dufus still got a gun?
 
Lessee if I have this right:

Guard confronts Cox, says Cox pulled a gun on him. Guard shoots at Cox, misses, and wings an innocent bystander. Since Cox was not hit, and presumably was not hindered by onyone immediately after the shooting (yes, an assumption)...if he, say, wanted to wander off and ditch a gun, he could.

All this news report tells us is that, in the heat of the moment, the guard missed.

I'm sure none of us would ever miss. And we've been in these situations so many times, right?

Mike
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top