Senate Considers Bush's ATF Nominee

Status
Not open for further replies.

Bubbles

Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2004
Messages
3,148
Location
Eastern Panhandle of West Virginia
AP Article

By ANDREW MIGA – 09/27/2007

WASHINGTON (AP) — U.S. Attorney Michael Sullivan fielded some tough questions about gun laws while winning praise Wednesday at a Senate confirmation hearing to become director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.

Sullivan, a former Republican state legislator and district attorney in Massachusetts, was nominated by President Bush for the job in March. He has been acting director of the agency for more than a year.

Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, D-Mass., who chaired the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, lauded Sullivan's "distinguished career in public service."

Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., introduced Sullivan at the hearing, praising both his professional abilities and his character.

"It is a job that he's proven more than qualified and capable of performing," Kerry said.

Sullivan also faced some grilling from Kennedy and Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., about whether the ATF would be willing to release more gun tracing data, a move the senators said could help state and local law agencies fight gun crime.

Sullivan said there has been confusion about what data ATF could share, but he said he hopes ATF will provide more data.

"I'm optimistic that there will be even more information available than provided in the past," he said.


The ATF frequently refuses to share gun tracing information with local law enforcement investigating trends in gun crime, according to Schumer. A provision in the Justice Department's spending plan for next year prohibits ATF from releasing case-specific information to the public.

New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg has pushed for the information, which he says will help local officials uncover dealers who sell guns that disproportionately end up in the hands of criminals.

Gun rights advocates such as the National Rifle Association, who successfully fought for the ban, said mayors want the data to sue out-of-state gun dealers. Gun rights supporters also say easing the ban could lead to the disclosure of police officers' identities to criminals.
 
Sullivan is from Massachusetts.

That might be why Kerry and Kennedy are sucking up to him.

Don't want to be seen blocking a nominee from their state.
 
I vote to dismantle the atf... We need a corporate raider type to take over the ATF, strip the place bare, lay off the workers, and get their M4 rifles out to bid in the Civie market...
 
I think that you all might be a little mislead by what "information" the ATF is releasing.
When Local LEO's obtain a gun that was used in a crime, they can (and many do) send that gun to the ATF for analysis. The ATF then examines the gun and determines (if they can) who the last known owner was, and where it came from. They stockpile this info. and it can be given to local LE departments upon legal requests.

To me this is inovative crime fighting technology which allows LEO's to find where problems are starting. If they are finding that one person in particular has sold guns that are being found often in crimes, I think there is good reason to look into what this person is doing. While I believe we all have a right to sell firearms whenever we want to, if someone is selling 100 guns and a majority end up in the hands of criminals, I think that LEO's need to know who he's selling to.
 
The fact of the matter is that most people don't even know what ATF does other than guns. We also never hear about all the scumbags that get arrested and rightly so - gang bangers, drug dealers, etc. - ATF works more cases per agent than just about any other agency, about 5x more cases than the FBI.

Are there questionable incidents? Certainly, just like withe the FBI, DEA, ICE and other agencies. And unfortunately, some pro-gun people are so anti-ATF that they support dirty dealers who make it bad for everyone.

As a side note, Ronald Reagan considered dispoving the ATF, and turning gun regulation duties over to the FBI. NRA said no, and rightly so. FBI has an even worse record than ATF. Who ran the Ruby Ridge fiasco? FBI. Who burned down the Mt Carmel in Waco? FBI.

Readers whould also recall that during the debate over the original Assault Weapons Ban, Ed Owens, head of the technology branch of ATF testified in front of congress that there was no fuctional difference between so called 'assault rifles' and other semi-automatic firearms.

The director probably won't have much impact anyway. For enforcement activities, ATF takes it cue from the administration and the US attorneys. Don't worry about the agencies, worry about the administration. The agencies only do what they are told.
 
I heard Reagan tried to stick the BATF under the Secret Service in 1982 but the liquor interests got Congress to block that.
 
LAR:
Reagan intended to disband the ATF, but only if other federal agencies would take the workers. The FBI strongly objected to having the ATF employees forced upon them (since the ATF's apptitude test standards were the lowest in the government, they needed 60% to pass vs 70+% for everyone else, thus the F-troop nickname), so it never happened.

Kharn
 
Last edited:
Kharn

You information is incorrect. Wouldbe agents take the same civil servant exam as all other federal LEOs. FBI is the only federal LEO that maintain seperate highering and training. All other agents train at FLETC in Glynco after basically the same hiring process.

Also, at that time, ATF was part of the Treasury. ATF agents (as well as Secret Service) are career civil servants. FBI agents are under Justice and are 'at will' employees who are not under civil service protections. ATF agents could not have had their civil servant status revoked, and so would have probably been transferred to another Treasury agency in the event ATF was disbanded.

FBI did not want to be responsible for gun law enforcement due to it's highly political nature. The last thing they wanted was to be put under the microscope by pro-gun organization, as they were already under the watchful eye of various civil liberties groups for their excesses.

ATF, like IRS, is a particularly loathed agency primarily due to it's former revenue gathering fuction ('revenuers'). ATF was disliked long before it got into the gun law enforcement business. People don't like anyone who regulates their guns, liquor or smokes. They like people who tax them even less.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top