Guillermo
member
For this reason alone I would never dump the lady
perhaps she was crying because she asked it she was the only one...and you told her the truth (BAD MOVE!!!)
either way, you are a hell of a shot
For this reason alone I would never dump the lady
At least it wasn't a "First .22 rimfire revolver" thread.3 posts into a tactical revolver thread and someone mentioned a glock.
It's only anecdotal, but my uncle (a U.S. Marine) carried a 4" Colt Python through Vietnam and from the few stories he's willing to tell, he used it to good effect in conjunction with a heavy duty flashlight. (He was a tunnel rat)
I didn't know that (and I'm not sure if my Uncle does either, I'll have to mention it) but from what I understand there were more than a few Pythons in Vietnam, and not just the ones with scales. Having shot one myself (once, the gun referred to in my previous post... you could feel the history), I can understand why they were a hot choice. Accurate, powerful, and that weight is just right to soak up the recoil but still be light enough to carry regularly (of course I carry an all steel commander size 1911... ymmv).IIRC, in the book Outpost of Freedom by Vietnam Medal of Honor earner Roger C. Donlon, he cites one of his Green Beret A-team members as being armed, by choice, with a Python .357 with a 6" barrel...
.
AUTO LOVERS SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO RELOAD!!
I didn't know that (and I'm not sure if my Uncle does either, I'll have to mention it) but from what I understand there were more than a few Pythons in Vietnam, and not just the ones with scales. Having shot one myself (once, the gun referred to in my previous post... you could feel the history), I can understand why they were a hot choice. Accurate, powerful, and that weight is just right to soak up the recoil but still be light enough to carry regularly (of course I carry an all steel commander size 1911... ymmv).
Hey, 230therapy, you look to have some aftermarket grips on that beast. Do they leave a bit more shell-clearance on the left side? My factory grips sometimes get in the way of loading/extracting full-length shells in clips.
Since you won't write a book, I have to get Ed's
15 yards using Remington 38.....125 grain +P I think....green box...his ammunition.
Can Guillermo actually read, or does he just look at the pictures?
And I can too FITZ it.
I need proof that a semi-auto, any semi-auto, is more rugged than a revolver. It's nearly impossible to believe.Not so fast...
While the revolver cannot be pushed out of battery, it can be rendered inoperative if your foe simply grasps the cylinder.
Grabbing the cylinder will prevent it from revolving and will prevent it from firing till the cylinder is released.
Revolvers are also less rugged than autoloaders.
Autoloaders can withstand drops and knocks and bangs much better than revolvers.
Yes, yes, and YEEEEESSSSSSS! Ed McGivern! I've been trying to think of that name ever since this thread went up! Ole Ed wouldn't use semi-autos because they were "TO SLOW."Guillermo:
Do yourself a favor. Go to www.amazon.com and buy a copy of Ed. McGivern's book Fast and Fancy Revolver Shooting. It, like the Old Fuff is old, but you just might learn something. Be sure to buy a reprint (used or new) rather then an original copy that would likely date from the early 1940's and be priced over $100 dollars.
Ed worked real hard at his shooting and almost got to be as good as I was.
Ole Ed wouldn't use semi-autos because they were "TO SLOW."
he was trying to pull the trigger but the slide hadn't gone into battery yet from the previous shot