Sheep must never, never swear at the wolves.

Status
Not open for further replies.
I find this fascinating, especially after having just finished reading Londonistan, which discusses the permissiveness of the British government toward their Muslim population.

Now, I do not say that to drive this thread off-topic, but more to comment on the permissiveness toward misbehaviour by youths as shown in the original post.

I hope that one of our UK members could give a brief summary of their perspective why so much misbehavior goes unpunished, beyond Fosbury's succinct statement.
 
Let me be candid: This doesn't strike me as politics or PC, it strikes me as pathology. And deep, pernicious, mortally-threatening social pathology at that. Call it punk politics, the next step on from punk rock.

When bullies run amok and the defenseless are mocked and made example of, the world is utterly upside-down. Lewis Carroll would have a lot to say about today's United Kingdom.

Your civilization--and it's one most of here deeply admire--is hanging in the balance, my friends across the sea.
 
I hope that one of our UK members could give a brief summary of their perspective why so much misbehavior goes unpunished, beyond Fosbury's succinct statement.

I don't know how much more I can say, that hasn't been said already. This is the sort of thing that is brought along with a nanny-state, socialist leaning government. Even though we British are criticised by our Police force for ". . .taking the law into their own hands. . .", you can't rely on the Police to do their job and protect us. Too much political correctness, too much nannying. All we are is a source of income for the government, and the fact that so many Gatso speed cameras and police with radar guns are deployed (they make millions) just goes to show this.

Government/management is just too big in this country, we have loads of hospital managers and directors, and not as many Doctors and nurses.

BUREAUCRACY BUREAUCRACY BUREAUCRACY
 
This is the second time I've been shocked by these stories in the past month.
To desensitize myself, I'm going to post a few I expect to see next month:

"Daughter sued by robber to replace bullets pumped into mother."

"Wife sued for knife sharpening costs after hooligans dull blades on husbands torso."

"Grandmother jailed when burgler breaks knuckle on orbital bone. Burgler's lawyers declare 20 million dollar lawsuit for pain and suffering. Police break grandmothers nose during arrest. Blair declares major terrorist threat neutralized, streets safer; warns working class citizens to never challenge authority or people who want their hard-earned property."

Ok, I think it's out of my system.:eek:
 
The sound of bleating sheep is very common in England these days. More so than when I lived there.

They've gotten what they deserve. They elected the socialist swine who made the laws they must now suffer under.

And they are doomed to live under them forever. Sheep go willingly to the slaughter. There aren't enough wolves left to make a difference.
 
Midas? If you have never used that terminology to someone, you are either very young, or very lucky, or very tolerant, or (other options are very low road).
Would you like to be jailed for something you say?
 
What's ironic is that the power of an Englishman to enforce the law himself and to restore public order is enshrined in British law. Somehow, the police enforce 'don't take the law into your own hands' as law, despite the law saying the exact opposite.

Kinda like how they enforce 'no guns for self-defence' as the word of god, even though British law says the exact opposite.

I certainly didn't vote for these [insert a string of horrendous expletives here]. Such is so called democracy.
 
Werewolf said:
They've gotten what they deserve. They elected the socialist swine who made the laws they must now suffer under.
Some of us didn't get much say in the matter, Mr. Wolf. I was two years old when Hungerford happened (1987), 11 years old when Dunblane happened (1996), and the first General Election that I was eligible to vote in was in 2005 (I was only 12 in 1997, only 16 in 2001).

So yeah, sucks to be me.
 
part of the problem?

The bureaucratic nannymind in operation? You will be told what to think, what to see.

335 road signs in eight-mile stretch
11.09.06

Country roads are being ruined by the 'clutter' of confusing road-signs and traffic calming measures that are putting lives at risk, experts have warned.

It is bringing a 'nightmare' of urban sprawl to once delightful villages.

Motoring groups and environmental campaigners have joined forces to urge the Government to rid rural lanes of unnecessary signs, speed-bumps, and other 'street furniture' that takes drivers' attention off the road.

The spread of signs is also proving an eyesore to country lovers by filling once idyllic rural roads with masses of painted warnings, chicanes, bumps, and 'build-outs' that are completely out of keeping with their surroundings.

Now the RAC Foundation and the Campaign for the Protection of Rural England are demanding councils carry out 'clutter audits' of the road- signs in their area - and remove those which are unnecessary, dangerous or simply an eyesore.

An unofficial audit by the CPRE revealed that a seven mile stretch of the rural B3006 in Hampshire, which passes through an area of outstanding natural beauty and the designated South Downs National Park, has an astonishing 335 signs - an average of 48 per mile.

This includes 207 safety signs (such as 'bend ahead'), 44 directional signs, 11 brown tourist signs, 18 blue cycle signs, 18 commercial signs for hotels or attractions, and 30 road-edge reflector poles.

Campaigners have also highlighted 'before and after' images along the Clanfield Road, at Bampton in Oxfordshire, and a T-junction near Canterbury where signs now spoil the view.

RAC Foundation executive director Edmund King will highlight the problem when he speaks today at a conference on roadsigns hosted at Loughborough University by the Institution of Highway Incorporated Engineers.

Mr King said:' Signs that are clear, concise. relevant, reliable and timely can improve safety and reduce the number of drivers who get lost each day.

'But a clutter of contradictory signs not only detract from the beauty of the countryside, they lead to confusion that can result in collisions.'

Mr King also attacked 'appalling and dangerous' traffic calming schemes - from built-out pinch-points to chicanes.

'These are both a visual eyesore and highly questionable in terms of road safety.'

Mr King said that if traffic calming is judged necessary, traffic planners such turn to something more in keeping with the countryside heritage, and fit traditional cattle grids.'This would be an effective way of slowing down traffic without ruining the visual environment of small villages.'

CPRE chief executive Shaun Spiers said:'People simply aren't prepared to put up with our countryside being blighted for no good reason. 'Local authorities should think again about putting up unnecessary road signs and keep our countryside from becoming a nightmare of garish signs.'

Campaigners want the Government to follow the lead of the Scottish Executive in producing clear guidance about signs and road-bumps in rural areas.

Studies in the US suggest that up to 30 per cent of accidents have 'driver distraction' as a factor - and that in 1 in 3 cases this is from distractions outside the car.

Drivers are already struggling with the clutter of road signs in urban areas. One of the most notorious spots has been on a busy junction of the A3 in New Malden, South West London, where drivers have had to contend with 19 different road signs giving 10 different instructions.

Research says that since the modern system of signage was introduced in 1968, the number of signs in the Highway Code has increased by 44 per cent.
 
I second the motion for those like-minded Brits trapped behind enemy lines to come on over. Ya'll can use your experience dealing with left-wing government to help us turn back the direction ours is headed in!
 
I second the motion for those like-minded Brits trapped behind enemy lines to come on over. Ya'll can use your experience dealing with left-wing government to help us turn back the direction ours is headed in!

Can anyone tell me how long it would take to legally emigrate and apply for citizenship in the USA?
 
16 years ago,whilst at my private school,I commited a minor offence (I can't remember,what it was.) and I remember being ushered to the deputy principals office and the principal grabbed my ear,twisted it and dragged me into the office-and gave me a dressing down-for my offence.

Now this offence that I commited,I think had something to do with the use of bad language and that in recent years,especially once Labour got into power,discipline had slowly crumbled and kids take the micheal with society-because they think that they can rook the legal system,into giving them what they want.I think that the discipline problem has gotten worse,because Labour is a nanny state.See our pathetic handgun ban:,sigh,moan,groan...

I also knew a South African teacher,who worked in a school in Kent,who grabbed a boy by the throat,because the boy swore at him-after he told him off for breaching heath and safety rules,in the schools science lab.The boy was so bloody arrogant, and rude that he said to Andre,the science teacher:"If you touch me again,I will get you fired you f****** c****.

Andre told me that he felt like breaking the little bastards balls,and making his voice squeak.:evil: :evil:
 
G36-UK,

Type up a resume and send it out to US companies. I don't know the specifics of immigration, but I believe you get "fast-tracked" if you allready have a job lined up.

Just try and steer clear of D.C., NYC, Boston, Baltimore, and Chicago.;)
 
I LOVE AMERICA

Thank my mom for having me here and not somewhere else.
Although not ideal, sure is a wonderful place to live!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top