Teacher Jailed Over Air Pistol Shots

Status
Not open for further replies.

dasmi

Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2005
Messages
2,783
Location
Colorado Springs, CO
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/allnew...r-jailed-over-air-pistol-shots-name_page.html

30 March 2005
TEACHER JAILED OVER AIR PISTOL SHOTS
By John Kelly

TEACHER Linda Walker was behind bars last night after she snapped and fired a gun she kept hidden in her underwear drawer at a gang of teenage yobs.

The mother-of-two, who teaches children with behavioural problems, admitted going "totally loopy" after confronting youths she blamed for a campaign of vandalism against her family.

Walker, 48, stormed out of her home with a potentially lethal Walther CP88 gas-powered pistol in her hand and fired six shots at the feet of one of the terrified gang.

She had just called the police and warned them: "I've got an air rifle and a pistol and I'm going to shoot the vandals that come around here, I'm going to shoot them."

Advertisement

Yesterday she was sentenced to six months in jail for possessing a firearm with intent to cause fear of violence and one month for affray. The sentences will run concurrently.

She is now likely to lose her teaching job.

Neighbours slammed the decision to jail her. One said she "deserved a medal for her actions".

Norman Brennan, national director of the Victims of Crime Trust, said: "What does it say about the criminal justice system when a teacher with an unblemished teaching record and an unblemished criminal record is forced to take the action she has.

"I cannot condone those who carry weapons in a public place but this case clearly goes to show there are not enough police officers on the beat and the courts fail to give sentences which punish criminals and those who behave anti-socially."

He added: "That is what forced her to take the action she did."

Walker, wearing a light pink skirt and white shirt, had denied the charges but showed little emotion as her sentence was read out at Manchester's Minshull Street crown court.

Her 56-year-old partner John Cavanagh, a college lecturer, had earlier been cleared of affray following the incident on August 14.

At her trial, the court was told Walker had been receiving nuisance phone calls, one threatening to rape her and another calling her 17-year-old twin son James a "poof".

Her other twin, Craig, had his car wing mirror ripped off and Walker told police her shed had been broken into, garden ornaments trashed and fish from a pond stolen at her home in Urmston, Greater Manchester, in the run-up to the shooting.

The final provocation came when Walker, who was head of Year 11, in charge of food technology and careers co-ordinator at New Park School in Salford, saw a washing-up liquid bottle full of water had been emptied over her son's car.

She stormed across the road yelling "psychos" and "tossers" at the gang. She then returned home and grabbed the two guns before racing back outside and opening fire at the louts.

Police who arrived at the scene ordered Walker to drop the weapon and then arrested her.

Later Walker - who has 25 years of experience as a teacher - had told officers she had left the house "like a madwoman possessed".

She had tested the small black pistol by firing it into her staircase.

During questioning, she told police: "The pellet hit the top of the stairs. My son was standing on the landing so it was probably very foolish of me because it could have ricocheted off and hit him.

"I feel totally, totally distressed after all these things that have been happening. I know you do your best, but the law is on the side of the yobbos, these criminals, not the victim.

"Kids keep coming down the road to vandalise my sons' cars because they don't have cars and are jealous."

She explained: "When your kids work hard for things and they get damaged you get protective.

"That's why I am running around with a gun. I have had enough, I have simply had enough."

It later emerged one of the youths, Robert McKiernan, 18, had previous convictions for burglary, theft and criminal damage.

Another of the gang, 16-year old Nicholas Viollett, had been convicted of shoplifting just one day before the shooting took place.

Walker - who had won praise from Ofsted - had been under stress after her school was placed under special measures by government inspectors, the court heard.

But Judge Mr Recorder Louis Browne told her: "I accept you acted totally out of character but these are serious offences and you knew exactly what you were doing.

"The courts discourage two things, firstly vigilante action, and also the use or discharging of a firearm in a public place.

"There is no excuse whatsoever for what you did that night. Even had these children been using anti-social behaviour, your response was wholly disproportionate."

A spokesman for Salford city council, said: "Linda Walker was suspended from her teaching post pending the police investigation and court action. Now legal proceedings are ended, any formal disciplinary action can also be concluded. This will be completed as quickly as possible."

Neighbour Ian Haslam, 77, said: "These kids hang around in the streets in groups and can be a real nuisance.

"I can understand what drove this lady to do this. You reach a point when something snaps.

"She has a good record for teaching and the trouble is once they target someone they don't seem to let up."

Another neighbour, who asked not to be named, added: "She should get a medal for what she did - not a stretch in jail."

And the local newsagent said: "This business is the talk of the town and public opinion is very much on her side. Mrs Walker is a lovely lady.

"She was clearly driven to the end of her tether."

It's a good thing they got that monster off the streets. :rolleyes:
 
Neighbours slammed the decision to jail her. One said she "deserved a medal for her actions".

Norman Brennan, national director of the Victims of Crime Trust, said: "What does it say about the criminal justice system when a teacher with an unblemished teaching record and an unblemished criminal record is forced to take the action she has.
It appears the juries still do what the Queen's officers tell them to do.

Pilgrim
 
6 months in prison for shooting a little pellet pistol at the feet of some vandals? I like how the story kept referring to the "firearm" and the "gun."
 
I dont know, I guess I can't comment because I wasnt at the trial, but its not the first time this kind of thing has happened. Sometimes its nice to see judges give a suspended sentence if he or she has to do anything.
I own that exact same pistol (but its trapped in the UK-long story) so I guess I must be a danger to society :rolleyes:
Obviously, the kids should have been arrested and it wouldnt have come to this.
 
"Kids keep coming down the road to vandalise my sons' cars because they don't have cars and are jealous."
AHA, here's the real reason - her own sons PROVOKED the yobs by having something they didn't! :barf:
 
Since when are 18 are 16&18 yr old CRIMINALS considered children or kids!





That sounds like the rubbish Sarah Brady and her minions spew out.
 
Um... The Walther CP88 (http://www.straightshooters.com/walther/walther4blue.html) can shoot .177 cal projectiles at a velocity of 380 to 400 fps. This is enough to cause serious harm (such as blindness).

The teacher also has an air rifle. Air rifles can be used for hunting.


The teacher threatened to shoot vandals. Then she shot them. Deadly weapons - or, even weapons that may cause severe bodily harm (if the air pistol isn't powerful enough to kill someone) are generally only to be used when a person is under the threat of death or severe bodily harm. Since when does vandilism qualify?

While the police may not have been taking appropriate actions, the story reads as though the woman didn't bring the air guns with her to protect herself while confronting the criminals, but as though she brought them to attack the kids.
Later Walker - who has 25 years of experience as a teacher - had told officers she had left the house "like a madwoman possessed".


How can anyone, here, condone that? It would have been inappropriate if she did this with a firearm, and it's inappropriate for her to have done this with an air gun.



Please, if I'm obviously missing something, please point it out.
 
Concur w/ATK

Do you really think that this is responsible behavior, shooting any sort of projectile at a property offender? What we do not know is if she would've fired rounds from a REAL gun had it been available.

Sounds like a critical lack of control for which she is the only one responsible.
 
"Um... The Walther CP88 can shoot .177 cal projectiles at a velocity of 380 to 400 fps. This is enough to cause serious harm (such as blindness)."

So can masturbation. A bunch of local punks push a law-abiding woman to the point she's overcome with anger and fires a (gasp!) air gun at them, and the law's response is to put *her* in jail?

Tim
 
Do you really think that this is responsible behavior, shooting any sort of projectile at a property offender? What we do not know is if she would've fired rounds from a REAL gun had it been available.

No, I don't think it is. I posted the story to illustrate how it seems, at least to me, that average UK citizens are getting very very sick of the law protecting criminals, and screwing them.
 
Norman Brennan, national director of the Victims of Crime Trust, said: "What does it say about the criminal justice system when a teacher with an unblemished teaching record and an unblemished criminal record is forced to take the action she has.

What does it say?

999 is a fake life saver.
 
TimRB,

"Um... The Walther CP88 can shoot .177 cal projectiles at a velocity of 380 to 400 fps. This is enough to cause serious harm (such as blindness)."

So can masturbation. A bunch of local punks push a law-abiding woman to the point she's overcome with anger and fires a (gasp!) air gun at them, and the law's response is to put *her* in jail?

I'm not sure of your tone. If it's snide, please take this as serious. If not, just take it as a semi-serious joke from a fool who fell for your joke:

Since when do you fire a .177 caliber, solid projectile, at 380 to 400 fps when you masterbate (or, more accurately, ejaculate)? I ran a quick google search, but couldn't come up with any velocities for ejaculation, forget firing something when a person does ejaculate. Can you please post some evidence of your claim?

Also, if the liquid that most fire were to get in one's eyes, I doubt that it would cause permanent blindness, as an air pistol would.
 
dasmi,

No, I don't think it is. I posted the story to illustrate how it seems, at least to me, that average UK citizens are getting very very sick of the law protecting criminals, and screwing them.

Ah. I didn't catch that your intent, earlier on.

You're right: the people in the story (esp. the neighborhood) appear to be very fed up.


I wonder if the thread can be successfully turned back to the original intent?
 
:cuss:
feel free to join me in my thread "Britain and Guns" if you can find anything more out of line to say

Also, bear in mind that newspapers like to turn anything into a drama and causing controversy, and the mirror is a tabloid. Most reasonably intelligent people see it for what it is.
She shouldn't have shot them, but they shouldnt have pushed her.
Whats funny is you can freely buy suppressors for air guns in the UK (not that this is relevant to the thread), but its so hard to buy a gun. Then in the US...
 
I wonder if a paintball gun or pepper spray would be considered a deadly weapon. Getting shot with a dozen paintballs upon entering the woman's property may have taught the kids a lesson.
 
Better yet, keep the paintballs in the freezer and crank up the regulator on the gun. I wonder if you could get 1000 fps out of a paintball gun? That would probably put a hole through someone.
 
Do you really think that this is responsible behavior, shooting any sort of projectile at a property offender?

Depends. In Texas it is, and I remember tales from my grandpa about how we used to shoot horse thieves.
 
I'm not going to take sides, or anyting, but I'm just imagining how many years the 'gang' members would do if they had said and done the things to this woman that she did to them? That woman sounds like she got off very very lightly, very very light. Very light. Very. Maybe a little too light. Very light.

And for general firearms discussion, I don't see how any one on this board could ever possibly side with her. So you decide to go and confront a gang that's not on you property with your handgun, and while you're threatening them and screaming literally like a maniac, which you admit you are, you then open fire on them.

Now here's the problem, either you're lieing about aiming for their feet, or you're special*. I don't think we even need to discuss why it's wrong to ever aim at the feet, in any situation ever. (except Way of the Gun).
 
I think she should have pleaded "not guilty due to temporary insanity" if that's possible in the U.K. She's probably loaded with post trumatic stress from working in a school so many years and would probably feel quite at home being treated in a more "therapeutic" setting, & getting "sick pay" to boot! :p
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top