The 20 Gauge 391 is really light, so it still has some recoil.
However, the 390 and 3901, while still in the sub-7 lb. range I want from a 20, aren't as light as the 391.
The 20 Gauge 390 I just picked up has a plastic buttplate and has essentially no felt recoil with 7/8 oz. bulk Remington Sport Loads (I ditched my 20 Gauge press a while ago because I didn't like the particular model, and never got another one when lead prices rose so high -- I will probably reload 20 again at some point).
For light recoil AND cheap commercial ammo, I think it's hard to beat that gun in 20 as a low-recoil semi for those who want one.
I've wavered but never bought a 28. Hell, I have a 16, but no 28. This gun has made me less interested in 28 -- though if I see a deal on the right break-action 28 at some point, I'll consider it.
However, the 390 and 3901, while still in the sub-7 lb. range I want from a 20, aren't as light as the 391.
The 20 Gauge 390 I just picked up has a plastic buttplate and has essentially no felt recoil with 7/8 oz. bulk Remington Sport Loads (I ditched my 20 Gauge press a while ago because I didn't like the particular model, and never got another one when lead prices rose so high -- I will probably reload 20 again at some point).
For light recoil AND cheap commercial ammo, I think it's hard to beat that gun in 20 as a low-recoil semi for those who want one.
I've wavered but never bought a 28. Hell, I have a 16, but no 28. This gun has made me less interested in 28 -- though if I see a deal on the right break-action 28 at some point, I'll consider it.