cropcirclewalker
member
I don't suffer "Useful Idiocy" well.
Sorry.
Sorry.
I didn't realize that the forum existed solely to support your personal use and wants.I don't suffer "Useful Idiocy" well.
Sorry.
What if private citizens could perform anonymous Brady checks via the 800 number, just like a FFL holder, but without the legal obligation to care one way or another about how the check turned out?
I am sorta torn between two questions.You can always stay the hell out of this thread, that way you wont have to "suffer" anything. You could be starting your own thread right about now
No.
FFL transactions shouldn't require a background check either.
rbernie said:What if private citizens could perform anonymous Brady checks via the 800 number, just like a FFL holder, but without the legal obligation to care one way or another about how the check turned out?
Would you voluntarily use that check?
You guys are not recommending that it should be OK to privately sell a firearm to a known felon? That just crazy.
I couldnt answer either one of those qustions. I dont hunt birds.
I do not personally disagree.As such, I find the idea that one should be required to get the ok of a bureaucrat in an office somewhere to be a needlessly stupid waste of time and taxpayer money
I find that response offensive. If we cannot in this forum engage in civil debate amongst ourselves (and by virtue of that likely strengthen our own position) - where can we do it? How will you educate if you insist upon group silence on these issues?Ok, there. It's happened. What I suspected. This string belongs on a Brady Bunch web site.
I find that response offensive.
We are *not* all of one mind, because each of us comes from different places with different experiences and learnings. If you're not willing to debate, educate, and learn - to contribute to the strength of the group - why are you even here?
Agreed. But I've already established that they're not my personal views. I'm just not scared to talk about it, to engage in back-and-forth debate to bring out the pros and cons of each perspective.You can debate as much as you wish, it's when your views are used to create rules that impact our 2A rights that things get ugly.
No, there has been no subtlety to your contributions.I have been subtlety trying to imply that I find this whole string offensive.
I sell very few guns but those that I have sold have all been after the buyer has been cleared by the Feds- If the buyer didn't like it he was shown the door- It's called CYA!-
Liberal would be the last thing anyone would call to me if they knew me, but I really could not care less what any of you think of me, so that's not the issue
If the authorities decide to make an example or test case out of you and you get the wrong judge, you're in deep doodoo!
I wish the above potential liabilities weren't the case, but the risks at least for me are too large not to be safe