Should S&W bring back 3rd gen pistols?

Should S&W bring back 3rd gen pistols?

  • Yes

    Votes: 29 39.2%
  • No

    Votes: 46 62.2%

  • Total voters
    74
I voted Yes, but I'd be surprised if it ever happened. My agency, like the CHP at that time, was still using the latest production 3rd gen guns (TSW's), when S&W said they had finally decided to discontinued even the LE production. That meant supporting them for major parts, too.

Now, I started using 3rd gen S&W's when they were newly released, and over the years I'd gone through the armorer class for them 4 times, so I was pretty familiar with them. I helped support some hundreds of them, and I owned quite a few of my own. They were rugged, durable, reliable and fine for working guns.

The problem, according to what we were told by S&W, was that they were too expensive in time and labor to continue producing, Sure, they'd shipped out the 3rd gen production to their Houlton plant, and added new CNC equipment and training to the folks there, but that plant was also busy making the SW1911's, which were selling better.

We were told that it took 30 minutes of machine time make each the frame and the slide of a 3rd gen, which meant that a SW1911 couldn't be made at the same time. The M&P, on the other hand, only required CNC machine time for the slide, as the frames were popped out of molds at the plastic plant down the road from the Springfield plant. That plant had made plastic parts for S&W, as a customer, for many years, so S&W finally bought that plastic factory.

The 3rd gen guns still required hand-fitting for the extractor and sear release lever, which took someone with a little training and experience. Hand-fitting the extractors was probably on its way to no longer being required, due to closer tolerances coming online. The last armorer update I attended had an extractor drop into a 5906TSW and gauge perfectly. Unsurprisingly really, as they only required armorers buy extractor bar gauges for the M&P 40/357 guns for the first couple of classes, and then they found they were no longer necessary as the extractors were dropping into the slides. From what I was told, that had resulted in them never having even offered .45 & 9mm extractor bar gauges to armorers. They weren't needed anymore. I suspect the 3rd gen slides would've been the same way if production had continued.

Sure, fitting extractors in old guns would probably still required fitting (filing & use of Go/No-Go gauge). Also, the use of a Force Dial Gauge to check for extractor tension was still needed. Even new TSW's might require an "optional' extractor spring, and older guns, with older tolerances, sometimes required different springs to get the tension within the recommended ranges for caliber.

Bottom line? I bought all the extra tools and parts I thought I might need to keep my own 3rd gen guns running for the rest of my life. Haven't needed anything other than some springs (normal wear parts), although I've dipped into my parts to refurb or repair a couple of old and hard-used 3rd gen's owned by other guys over the years. (A couple chipped extractors, soft springs, old ejectors with revised ones, etc.)

S&W could resurrect the 3rd gen's, but only at the cost of cutting into the production of other, proven selling models. The cost in extra machine time, and perhaps some remaining hand fitting (if only of the sear release levers for decocking), would probably push the cost higher than the M&P's.

Then, who would be the 'market'? Not LE, since even SIG and Beretta figured out that plastic is King going forward in that market. Ditto the Military, for the same reason. Is there enough commercial market to justify a new 3rd gen catalog, even a small one? Dunno. They're busy selling their metal-framed CSX and M&P pistols, and a couple other companies have been releasing metal-framed pistols again. Would that make it easier or harder to squeeze in metal framed 3rd gen's again, though?

Personally, I'd really like to see either a Scandium aluminum update of their 3913TSW, or an all-stainless steel version, which would've likely been a 3916 under their old, but admittedly inconsistent, model numbering system. Since they released the CXS, though, I kinda doubt a new 3913 may be in their plans.

Never Say Never with S&W, though, as their corporate people make some unexpected decisions now and then.
 
I went the opposite route. First was a DAO 4043 and then I went to the DA/SA versions. I like them all though. Mine are all basically stock configuration. Theres not really anything to improve on them. My Aluminum 40s ones I put Extra Power hammer springs in them to slow the slide speed down a little. Grease I use on the rails is TW25B milspec because it sticks better to Aluminum unlike oil. Im not a huge fan of the factory springs on most of the magazines (kinda weak springs) so I tend to replace them with wolff extra power mag springs. Ive never had a follower go bad even with late 70s early 80s era magazines. The magazine bases all hold up well to other than some of the compacts like the 6906 that can have the plastic chip at the rear if they are rough handled. They still dont fail though. 59/5900 series might be my favorite double stack single feed magazine design.

If I use one for carry its usually the DAO Aluminum framed variation. I like that 4043 quite a bit.
 
I voted Yes, but I'd be surprised if it ever happened. My agency, like the CHP at that time, was still using the latest production 3rd gen guns (TSW's), when S&W said they had finally decided to discontinued even the LE production. That meant supporting them for major parts, too.

Now, I started using 3rd gen S&W's when they were newly released, and over the years I'd gone through the armorer class for them 4 times, so I was pretty familiar with them. I helped support some hundreds of them, and I owned quite a few of my own. They were rugged, durable, reliable and fine for working guns.

The problem, according to what we were told by S&W, was that they were too expensive in time and labor to continue producing, Sure, they'd shipped out the 3rd gen production to their Houlton plant, and added new CNC equipment and training to the folks there, but that plant was also busy making the SW1911's, which were selling better.

We were told that it took 30 minutes of machine time make each the frame and the slide of a 3rd gen, which meant that a SW1911 couldn't be made at the same time. The M&P, on the other hand, only required CNC machine time for the slide, as the frames were popped out of molds at the plastic plant down the road from the Springfield plant. That plant had made plastic parts for S&W, as a customer, for many years, so S&W finally bought that plastic factory.

The 3rd gen guns still required hand-fitting for the extractor and sear release lever, which took someone with a little training and experience. Hand-fitting the extractors was probably on its way to no longer being required, due to closer tolerances coming online. The last armorer update I attended had an extractor drop into a 5906TSW and gauge perfectly. Unsurprisingly really, as they only required armorers buy extractor bar gauges for the M&P 40/357 guns for the first couple of classes, and then they found they were no longer necessary as the extractors were dropping into the slides. From what I was told, that had resulted in them never having even offered .45 & 9mm extractor bar gauges to armorers. They weren't needed anymore. I suspect the 3rd gen slides would've been the same way if production had continued.

Sure, fitting extractors in old guns would probably still required fitting (filing & use of Go/No-Go gauge). Also, the use of a Force Dial Gauge to check for extractor tension was still needed. Even new TSW's might require an "optional' extractor spring, and older guns, with older tolerances, sometimes required different springs to get the tension within the recommended ranges for caliber.

Bottom line? I bought all the extra tools and parts I thought I might need to keep my own 3rd gen guns running for the rest of my life. Haven't needed anything other than some springs (normal wear parts), although I've dipped into my parts to refurb or repair a couple of old and hard-used 3rd gen's owned by other guys over the years. (A couple chipped extractors, soft springs, old ejectors with revised ones, etc.)

S&W could resurrect the 3rd gen's, but only at the cost of cutting into the production of other, proven selling models. The cost in extra machine time, and perhaps some remaining hand fitting (if only of the sear release levers for decocking), would probably push the cost higher than the M&P's.

Then, who would be the 'market'? Not LE, since even SIG and Beretta figured out that plastic is King going forward in that market. Ditto the Military, for the same reason. Is there enough commercial market to justify a new 3rd gen catalog, even a small one? Dunno. They're busy selling their metal-framed CSX and M&P pistols, and a couple other companies have been releasing metal-framed pistols again. Would that make it easier or harder to squeeze in metal framed 3rd gen's again, though?

Personally, I'd really like to see either a Scandium aluminum update of their 3913TSW, or an all-stainless steel version, which would've likely been a 3916 under their old, but admittedly inconsistent, model numbering system. Since they released the CXS, though, I kinda doubt a new 3913 may be in their plans.

Never Say Never with S&W, though, as their corporate people make some unexpected decisions now and then.
Great post. Lots of good info in there thanks. 5" 1006 10mm (as I keep saying) is the obvious candidate. Theres just not that many of them out there compared to the rest of the models. If they started production on the 1006 again the 4506 is pretty easy. A lot of people over at the S&W forums run 45 super through their 4506 pistols because they are so strong.

Most of the duty 9mm and 40s are still pretty common so I dont see those being a viable candidate in terms of sales/demand. 5" barrel steel framed 1006/4506 for 10mm and 45acp/super would be a hit. 6" longslides even more so. These would be heavy duty, top of the line pistols in S&Ws production lineup.
 
Great post. Lots of good info in there thanks. 5" 1006 10mm (as I keep saying) is the obvious candidate. Theres just not that many of them out there compared to the rest of the models. If they started production on the 1006 again the 4506 is pretty easy. A lot of people over at the S&W forums run 45 super through their 4506 pistols because they are so strong.

Most of the duty 9mm and 40s are still pretty common so I dont see those being a viable candidate in terms of sales/demand. 5" barrel steel framed 1006/4506 for 10mm and 45acp/super would be a hit. 6" longslides even more so. These would be heavy duty, top of the line pistols in S&Ws production lineup.

When I was still periodically updating my various S&W armorer classes, and the subject of 10mm came up, we were told that there was a division of opinions within the company regarding whether to make their return to 10mm in either the SW1911 or the M&P lines. (We finally found out who won, huh? ;) ) The 3rd gen 10XX series guns were never mentioned. It was earlier said that some of the older equipment used in the production of slides and barrels had long since been discarded, but as newer CNC and barrel making equipment had been coming online that was seemingly less of an issue. I remember being told in the early 2000's that S&W had been upgrading their manufacturing capabilities and adding a few million dollar's worth of new manufacturing machines almost every year. I was told that in at least a couple of the years that the investment was in the double digits. They were buying other companies, too, like TC (for the rifle barrel manufacturing equipment), that plastic factory down the road from the Springfield plant (various 3rd gen parts, but now primarily plastic frames). Then they decided to start doing their own nitrocarburizing (instead of outsourcing it), instead of oursourcing it to other American-based vendors. We were told that they'd decided they needed better control of the QC for the process, which meant owning it and doing it in-house, and they also found they could do the process for other gun companies (and the other gun companies could attach whatever proprietary name to the process they wished for their own products ;) ).

I stopped updating my armorer classes for the various model lines once I'd completely retired from serving as a firearms instructor and armorer a few years ago. Obviously, as some of the older lines were declared 'obsolete', those armorer classes fell by the wayside, like the 3rd gen's and the SW99/P99's. I did a single DAO revolver armorer class just so I could have some basic familiarity with servicing and repairing my own S&W revolvers in my retirement. ;) Same reason I went through the M&P classes and Glock classes 5 times each. I did the Shield class once, just in case I decided to pick one up (not yet). I didn't recert on the SIG (Classic) or Colt Model O Pistol (1911), since I decided not to buy any SIG's, and I figured between the Colt and SW1911 armorer manuals I'd be able to do routine stuff. S&W has been turning out a lot of new stuff. Kinda wild. Glock has been busy addressing some things long overdue in their line, meaning creating the Gen5, but for my own needs I doubt I'll ever own anything 'newer' than the Gen3's (especially since the Gen4's are being discontinued). Different strokes. :)
 
When I was still periodically updating my various S&W armorer classes, and the subject of 10mm came up, we were told that there was a division of opinions within the company regarding whether to make their return to 10mm in either the SW1911 or the M&P lines. (We finally found out who won, huh? ;) ) The 3rd gen 10XX series guns were never mentioned. It was earlier said that some of the older equipment used in the production of slides and barrels had long since been discarded, but as newer CNC and barrel making equipment had been coming online that was seemingly less of an issue. I remember being told in the early 2000's that S&W had been upgrading their manufacturing capabilities and adding a few million dollar's worth of new manufacturing machines almost every year. I was told that in at least a couple of the years that the investment was in the double digits. They were buying other companies, too, like TC (for the rifle barrel manufacturing equipment), that plastic factory down the road from the Springfield plant (various 3rd gen parts, but now primarily plastic frames). Then they decided to start doing their own nitrocarburizing (instead of outsourcing it), instead of oursourcing it to other American-based vendors. We were told that they'd decided they needed better control of the QC for the process, which meant owning it and doing it in-house, and they also found they could do the process for other gun companies (and the other gun companies could attach whatever proprietary name to the process they wished for their own products ;) ).

I stopped updating my armorer classes for the various model lines once I'd completely retired from serving as a firearms instructor and armorer a few years ago. Obviously, as some of the older lines were declared 'obsolete', those armorer classes fell by the wayside, like the 3rd gen's and the SW99/P99's. I did a single DAO revolver armorer class just so I could have some basic familiarity with servicing and repairing my own S&W revolvers in my retirement. ;) Same reason I went through the M&P classes and Glock classes 5 times each. I did the Shield class once, just in case I decided to pick one up (not yet). I didn't recert on the SIG (Classic) or Colt Model O Pistol (1911), since I decided not to buy any SIG's, and I figured between the Colt and SW1911 armorer manuals I'd be able to do routine stuff. S&W has been turning out a lot of new stuff. Kinda wild. Glock has been busy addressing some things long overdue in their line, meaning creating the Gen5, but for my own needs I doubt I'll ever own anything 'newer' than the Gen3's (especially since the Gen4's are being discontinued). Different strokes. :)
Well the thing with the 10xx series is they were only made for about 4 years. 40S&W really buried the 10mm demand. Now thats basically flip flopped. I think the last 10xx pistols were made in 1995. When 10mm started gaining speed I thought it was a given we would see S&W performance center or enhanced 1006 pistols again. Delta Elite came back. Everyone and their sister is making a 10mm 1911 these days. Sig Sauer did a 10mm p220 finally. These are the upper tier 10mms of course but they do sell and give the buying public some options. S&W and the 1006 is really what brought the 10mm to the mainstream though. The Bren Ten wasnt really a success due to manufacturing struggles. The 1006 however was a little "too good" for the FBI LOL. Smith and Wesson cut its life far too short. Its really the only 3rd gen they did that with in terms of cartridge. Hence the crazy prices on the secondary market and consistent demand over the years since it was discontinued. 10mm is no longer a niche group its mainstream now. I sure didnt get the memo on everyone begging S&W for homely 22wmr pistols and hideous folding carbines with the width of a cinder block. S&W has done some strange moves in the past (throwaway Sigma SW9M and SW380 comes to mind) but this direction they are taking right now is kind of a let down. Its starting to look like they are trying to be Ruger.

Oh and CZ needs to do the Bren Ten. Thats just a given. I get that they are successful now and busy with this "Colt thing" but the Bren Ten is a no brainer. Also.. Ruger comes out with a 10mm P series they are back in the bigtime. Closest thing we ever got to that was the P91 and P94 40S&W. Enough with the flimsy stuff Ruger!

All the hard core enthusiasts know that the Gun industry just recycles and rebrands things with a new spin for the newbies. Its about time Smith and Ruger bring back back some of their best designs. Particularly in 10mm since thats what everyone wants.

Hey.. Steyr wants to make inroads and get some name recognition here in the USA? Make a run of the GB pistol and see what happens. Not sure how a Gas delay system would work in 10mm (probably a HOT pistol) but 9mm is still very popular and the GB is a pretty exceptional and high end pistol. Youtubers would go crazy over that pistol. Steyr is one of two Euro manufacturers that are top of the line that the American buying public have no clue about (outside fanatics). FN is screwing up with the New High Power like usual. They need to take a lesson from CZ and get the prices WAY down on the new High Power for a loss leader strategy at least for a few years. So short sighted is FN.
 
It's way outdated as a service pistol and would get no military/LEO sales.

IMHO, they wouldn't be able to make them inexpensively enough to compete with the used originals.

Can't see anything but a money pit here for S&W.
I'm curious how you define "outdated".

Traditional double action or DAO hammer fired pistols are still very much relevant. Sig, CZ, HK, etc all still make them.

The grip panels can be changed to fit different hands, something which took the polymer pistol market until about 2008 to figure out was a good idea.

The TSW series added rails if you care for it.

Sights were easily swapped on nearly all 3rd gen models.

Micro RDS can be added like any other handgun, and it would be an easy factory feature to incorporate in a new production line.

The only arena they're "behind the times" in is not having threaded barrels, but that could be easily remedied with new production, and in the mean time, it's something I've been doing with them commercially for a long time

20230203_191535.jpg
 
I'm curious how you define "outdated".

Traditional double action or DAO hammer fired pistols are still very much relevant. Sig, CZ, HK, etc all still make them.

The grip panels can be changed to fit different hands, something which took the polymer pistol market until about 2008 to figure out was a good idea.

The TSW series added rails if you care for it.

Sights were easily swapped on nearly all 3rd gen models.

Micro RDS can be added like any other handgun, and it would be an easy factory feature to incorporate in a new production line.

The only arena they're "behind the times" in is not having threaded barrels, but that could be easily remedied with new production, and in the mean time, it's something I've been doing with them commercially for a long time

View attachment 1165364
LOL.. Someone is a fan of the SOCOM Hush Puppies! Nice picture.. All sorts of neat work in there.
 
I'm curious how you define "outdated".

Traditional double action or DAO hammer fired pistols are still very much relevant. Sig, CZ, HK, etc all still make them.

The grip panels can be changed to fit different hands, something which took the polymer pistol market until about 2008 to figure out was a good idea.

The TSW series added rails if you care for it.

Sights were easily swapped on nearly all 3rd gen models.

Micro RDS can be added like any other handgun, and it would be an easy factory feature to incorporate in a new production line.

The only arena they're "behind the times" in is not having threaded barrels, but that could be easily remedied with new production, and in the mean time, it's something I've been doing with them commercially for a long time

View attachment 1165364

I like hammer-fired metal pistols better than polymer striker-fired ones. My favs are my 1911's and CZ75's.

But I was born in another century and another millennium.

To younger shooters a S&W third generation pistol probably seems obsolescent and dated. I can't imagine they would appreciate the weight or the trigger.

My Model 915 is a perfectly adequate service pistol. I would be completely comfortable with it for SD. But a PD in 2023 isn't going to re-equip their officers with a copy of it. Not going to happen.
 
Oh and CZ needs to do the Bren Ten. Thats just a given. I get that they are successful now and busy with this "Colt thing" but the Bren Ten is a no brainer. Also.. Ruger comes out with a 10mm P series they are back in the bigtime. Closest thing we ever got to that was the P91 and P94 40S&W. Enough with the flimsy stuff Ruger!
Agreed about the Bren Ten. I don't know why CZ canceled the CZ 75 in .40. It had weight behind it to soak up recoil. I guess is just wasn't selling.
 
Agreed about the Bren Ten. I don't know why CZ canceled the CZ 75 in .40. It had weight behind it to soak up recoil. I guess is just wasn't selling.
CZ will bring it back again once the 40S&W has a resurgence (which will happen). What I dont see ever returning is the CZ40B which is an excellent pistol. Anything is possible but nobody ever talks about the CZ40B design anymore. All kinds of awesomeness in that pistol. I dont carry mine because its to darn nice/new but have contemplated the idea of picking up another one thats a bit used for CCW. CZ was basically a nobody when they decided to dump those on the market. There was a time when you could pick up brand new CZ 75s for under $400 because they were trying to break into the US market and gain name recognition. Once that happened they started raising their prices substantially. Now their steel frame designs are close to custom shop level. CZ is a Wonderful manufacturer though. They understand quality and deserve the recognition they have now. And understand... my loyalty is with American Manufacturers.. and Beretta of course. Its an 80s era thing. Im not Italian.
 
I like hammer-fired metal pistols better than polymer striker-fired ones. My favs are my 1911's and CZ75's.

But I was born in another century and another millennium.

To younger shooters a S&W third generation pistol probably seems obsolescent and dated. I can't imagine they would appreciate the weight or the trigger.

My Model 915 is a perfectly adequate service pistol. I would be completely comfortable with it for SD. But a PD in 2023 isn't going to re-equip their officers with a copy of it. Not going to happen.
Would have to be used in a popular video game or Action "operator" film for the younger generation to younger generations. The average LEO is not a firearms enthusiast. I had to fix my old neighbors M&P one day FAST because he was screwing around on the couch before work and decided he wanted to see what the pin holding the trigger in place was for LOL. I fixed it fast enough with a toothpick for a tool on his front porch (he came over and got me). I dont think he knew how to clean it because it was filthy and Im sure he had never cleaned the magazine internals. I got it cleaned up pretty quick though and he made his shift.
 
I voted yes. The 3913 checks most of the blocks for me for a carry gun that I'd want in a new production gun - like TDA with a safety/decocker that I can choose to disengage when in the holster - or not. I like a manual safety and firing pin block.

If they S&W came up with a carry pistol that was the same size or smaller, same weight or lighter and same capacity or greater, I would buy one. If that's reintroducing the 39xx models, thumbs up.
 
I voted yes. The 3913 checks most of the blocks for me for a carry gun that I'd want in a new production gun - like TDA with a safety/decocker that I can choose to disengage when in the holster - or not. I like a manual safety and firing pin block.

If they S&W came up with a carry pistol that was the same size or smaller, same weight or lighter and same capacity or greater, I would buy one. If that's reintroducing the 39xx models, thumbs up.
Me too. And before I get accused of being a “fanboi”, I’d buy another brand if it fit that bill. For me, it’s all about size and weight for carry. I think a slightly smaller polymer 4th Gen would sell big. The Springfield XDE tried it, but that gun was way too big for what it was, not to mention the extremely high bore axis, something Sig hammer fired guns are known for.

Even if Smith just replaced the alloy frame with a polymer one and streamlined the gun a bit, they’d sell some guns. Certainly as many as the CSX, which they had no problem designing and producing. Even if they’d put out a TDA CSX, that would be great. If the CSX was TDA, I know I’d sell my striker fired carry guns immediately, and a SA cocked and locked pistol certainly targets a smaller audience than a TDA does. A polymer framed CS9 with a newly designed magazine to hold more ammo, like the Shield Plus did over the original Shield, and make it a decocker only version, like Beretta did with the 92, would be my perfect carry setup.

Ah, well. We can all dream. Doubtful Smith, or any other manufacturer does it. The failure of the XDE scared anybody else away. Even this hammer fired loving shooter thought that one was an abomination.
 
Last edited:
Even if Smith just replaced the alloy frame with a polymer

Ah, well. We can all dream. Doubtful Smith, or any other manufacturer does it. The failure of the XDE scared anybody else away. Even this hammer fired loving shooter thought that one was an abomination.
Warranted or not, I like a safety vs a decocker only. But not a deal killer.

Shows more of my ignorance, because I hadn’t really heard about the XD-E. It appears to actually be somewhat smaller than the 3913, so if it functions, I would have considered it. What about it was an abomination?
 
Warranted or not, I like a safety vs a decocker only. But not a deal killer.

Shows more of my ignorance, because I hadn’t really heard about the XD-E. It appears to actually be somewhat smaller than the 3913, so if it functions, I would have considered it. What about it was an abomination?
I like a safety too. I just know most don’t so I said decocker. Optimally they’d design it like the newer Beretta 92’s so you can decide which way you like it.

The XDE was just really tall and couldn’t compete with the high capacity micro 9’s that were coming out. It was heavier and bigger than any of the micro 9’s. The cocked and locked was a nice feature but I can’t imagine many would use it.

As much as I love the 3913 and sometimes carry the DAO version of it, the 3953, the 8 round capacity would have to be addressed if S&W wanted to sell many. For me, 8+1 is enough for carry, but in the days of Sig 365’s, it wouldn’t really compete.

Make a CS9 with a lighter frame, cut an ounce or two in weight with newer internals, and increase the capacity to 10 rounds and I will have found my final carry gun. It would be easier and more cost effective to modify the CSX to shoot TDA, though. I’d have one in a heartbeat if they made one of those.
 
Make a CS9 with a lighter frame, cut an ounce or two in weight with newer internals, and increase the capacity to 10 rounds and I will have found my final carry gun. It would be easier and more cost effective to modify the CSX to shoot TDA, though. I’d have one in a heartbeat if they made one of those.

I really like my 3913. Out of curiosity, I drew up a grid to try to compare it to the XD-E. 3913 Aesthetics win hands down IMHO, but I think the dimensions of the XD-E would work.

Looks like Springfield made and sold the XD-E for $500 and S&W makes and sells the metal frame CSX for about $500. Combine the features of the two, smaller TDA/metal frame, extra capacity for around $550 - yes please. Now if only I had a billion dollars, I would even spare a few dollars and fund someone to help design that.

IMG_2365.jpeg


IMG_2367.jpeg
 
I really like my 3913. Out of curiosity, I drew up a grid to try to compare it to the XD-E. 3913 Aesthetics win hands down IMHO, but I think the dimensions of the XD-E would work.

Looks like Springfield made and sold the XD-E for $500 and S&W makes and sells the metal frame CSX for about $500. Combine the features of the two, smaller TDA/metal frame, extra capacity for around $550 - yes please. Now if only I had a billion dollars, I would even spare a few dollars and fund someone to help design that.

View attachment 1166611


View attachment 1166612
I agree. And the pic of the 3913 you used is the LadySmith version with the slanted dust cover which I never liked. The standard dust cover is way more attractive to me.
 
And the pic of the 3913 you used is the LadySmith version with the slanted dust cover which I never liked. The standard dust cover is way more attractive to me.
Ah, the nuances... and here I thought I was the only guy that felt this way. I also do not like that grey "Delrin" grip covering.

So does @MachIVshooter like the 3rd gen S&W pistols, or is he just teasing us?

Finally, yes, the 5906 with the hooked trigger guard and arched backstrap is still one of the sexiest autopistol designs ever, along with the Beretta 92, the 1911A1 and the CZ-75. Heck, I'd advocate bringing the 5906 back on the basis of looks alone.
 
Ah, the nuances... and here I thought I was the only guy that felt this way. I also do not like that grey "Delrin" grip covering.

So does @MachIVshooter like the 3rd gen S&W pistols, or is he just teasing us?

Finally, yes, the 5906 with the hooked trigger guard and arched backstrap is still one of the sexiest autopistol designs ever, along with the Beretta 92, the 1911A1 and the CZ-75. Heck, I'd advocate bringing the 5906 back on the basis of looks alone.
Splitting hairs, but this one is the 3913NL. Same same, I know. I like the black grips better , too, but I’m OK with gray so not going to replace them. Okay. Now you got me thinking I should get some Hogue grips to “preserve” the originals. Hmm, if only S&W still made grips for these.

Is there any functional difference between the NL and standard dust cover frame? Same slide and internal parts?
 
Ah, the nuances... and here I thought I was the only guy that felt this way. I also do not like that grey "Delrin" grip covering.

So does @MachIVshooter like the 3rd gen S&W pistols, or is he just teasing us?

Finally, yes, the 5906 with the hooked trigger guard and arched backstrap is still one of the sexiest autopistol designs ever, along with the Beretta 92, the 1911A1 and the CZ-75. Heck, I'd advocate bringing the 5906 back on the basis of looks alone.
I was going to mention the grey grips but I figured they were cosmetic only so why bother? But I hate the grey, also. The Hogue grips for the single stack compacts and the double stacked full size are good. A hair wider than factory but they are individual panels so they make taking them off to clean very easy. The wrap around grips for the double stack compacts like the 6906, are terrible. Make the grip WAY fatter and I don't like or want the finger grooves.
 
Splitting hairs, but this one is the 3913NL. Same same, I know. I like the black grips better , too, but I’m OK with gray so not going to replace them. Okay. Now you got me thinking I should get some Hogue grips to “preserve” the originals. Hmm, if only S&W still made grips for these.

Is there any functional difference between the NL and standard dust cover frame? Same slide and internal parts?
Yeah, the LadySmith and the NL version are the same gun. Smith figured out guys didn't want to carry a gun with LadySmith on it.
 
I voted no because I don’t ever see it happening. The 3rd generations came out during the wonder 9 era. There was a lot of invitations in the auto pistol world happening. There was the transition from revolver to auto going own. A lot trial and error. When the smoke finally settled it was polymer, lighter and cheap to make that won out. As good as the 3rd generations were, they just didn’t have any of that. I love my 4006 it’s a great pistol but it’s not what sells today. I hated to see the 2nd generation S&W autos go also. I always liked the model 39 but never cared for an aluminum frame. I, imo, believe the 539 and 639 got everything wrong with the model 39 right. We should just enjoy them for what they are. All the pistols made in this era were more or less experiments. There are very few, from that era being made today. This era even put the final nail in the coffin for the Browning Hi-Power. It is making a comeback but it will be interesting to see if it stays very long.
 
Nah - that would be a niche offering even amongst gun enthusiasts. Amongst the general buying public it'd be a complete flop.

If you want one there's not exactly a shortage of them and they're not expensive. The only guns that are cool when a manufacturer brings them back into production is when the used price has exceeded the new price (ie, the SIG P210). That ain't the case with with a S&W 3rd gen.
 
Back
Top