stubbicatt
Member
Good Day: I've been working through my present reloading setup in anticipation of perhaps shooting F/TR later this summer. In preparation, I dusted off my old Lee Classic Cast Turret press, and began by resizing a few cartridges in attempt to set the shoulders back properly. I learned a lot of things, and I jotted down a few questions that arose.
I'm using a RCBS X Die, which I really like, a RCBS shell holder, and Lapua brass in 308 cal.
Unsized brand new brass measured out at 3.637 to 3.629 inches at the shoulder using the Stoney Point Comparator, insert numbered ".400."
Fired brass, not resized, was consistently 3.628 inches.
My resized cases, from dinking about with die adjustments, came in between 3.626 and 3.629". I had rather expected better consistency in the as sized brass. Which got me to thinking, what would lead to such inconsistency?
I had three theories about this .003" variance, and thought I'd seek validation of the theories, assuming that you guys are getting tighter readings in your setups.
1. The turret press maybe flexes enough to give the .003" variation in shoulder setback.
2. The X die acting on case necks imparts different shoulder setback.
3. The expander ball, me not having lubed the insides of the necks, pulling on the necks, pulled the shoulders forward for longer readings.
-There may be other answers as well, but these are the ideas I came up with.
Possible fixes/responses I came up with to my theories:
1. I no longer have an "O" type press, having gifted my Redding press to my son to initiate his interest in this hobby, so I cannot compare my results in the turret press to such a more rigid press at this time.
2. Not willing at this time to ditch the X die to see if a different arrangement works better. However, if necessary, I can ditch the expander ball and use a Lyman "M" die to expand and flare the necks to accept a bullet, after "outside" resizing.
3. Next time I size the cases, I will lube the insides of the necks to avoid expander ball screech, and perhaps level things out.
Thanks guys for helping me think this through.
Second Observation:
I am really pleased how well the Lee seater die works in this application, seating either 155 Scenars or 175 SMK bullets. In the case of the 175 SMK, measured at the ogive with the Stoney Point Comparator, the ogives measured out at a low of 3.248 and a high of 3.252. The 155 Scenars came in at 3.198 to 3.201".
This is a .003 to .004" variance in seating depth. Again, I do not know how uniform this measurement should be, i.e. are you guys getting more consistent seating depths with your setups? Or is this about what one can expect?
Thanks for your experiences and suggestions in advance.
Regards,
Stubb.
I'm using a RCBS X Die, which I really like, a RCBS shell holder, and Lapua brass in 308 cal.
Unsized brand new brass measured out at 3.637 to 3.629 inches at the shoulder using the Stoney Point Comparator, insert numbered ".400."
Fired brass, not resized, was consistently 3.628 inches.
My resized cases, from dinking about with die adjustments, came in between 3.626 and 3.629". I had rather expected better consistency in the as sized brass. Which got me to thinking, what would lead to such inconsistency?
I had three theories about this .003" variance, and thought I'd seek validation of the theories, assuming that you guys are getting tighter readings in your setups.
1. The turret press maybe flexes enough to give the .003" variation in shoulder setback.
2. The X die acting on case necks imparts different shoulder setback.
3. The expander ball, me not having lubed the insides of the necks, pulling on the necks, pulled the shoulders forward for longer readings.
-There may be other answers as well, but these are the ideas I came up with.
Possible fixes/responses I came up with to my theories:
1. I no longer have an "O" type press, having gifted my Redding press to my son to initiate his interest in this hobby, so I cannot compare my results in the turret press to such a more rigid press at this time.
2. Not willing at this time to ditch the X die to see if a different arrangement works better. However, if necessary, I can ditch the expander ball and use a Lyman "M" die to expand and flare the necks to accept a bullet, after "outside" resizing.
3. Next time I size the cases, I will lube the insides of the necks to avoid expander ball screech, and perhaps level things out.
Thanks guys for helping me think this through.
Second Observation:
I am really pleased how well the Lee seater die works in this application, seating either 155 Scenars or 175 SMK bullets. In the case of the 175 SMK, measured at the ogive with the Stoney Point Comparator, the ogives measured out at a low of 3.248 and a high of 3.252. The 155 Scenars came in at 3.198 to 3.201".
This is a .003 to .004" variance in seating depth. Again, I do not know how uniform this measurement should be, i.e. are you guys getting more consistent seating depths with your setups? Or is this about what one can expect?
Thanks for your experiences and suggestions in advance.
Regards,
Stubb.