Apparently from what was learned in the earlier thread once you petition a case to the US Supreme Court and get denied you cannot re-file at a later date. We only have so many good cases and they only come every so often and they take years to get to SCOTUS. Currently we have a make up on the court that makes it questionable whether we could get a positive or negative ruling from the court on a 2nd Amendment case however the bigger problem is that we have a court that is straight up refusing to take any 2nd Amendment cases at all, thus the make up of the court doesn't even matter if the court won't hear the case.
Are we wasting good cases by sending them up to SCOTUS only to have them deny cert? SCOTUS hasn't taken a major 2nd Amendment case in years and is showing no signs that it wants to.
I don't know how long you have after a case is ruled on in the other courts before you petition it to the US Supreme Court but if you only have a certain amount of time that maybe why 2nd Amendment advocates are sending cases to SCOTUS even if they have almost no chance of being granted cert.
Shouldn't Pro-2nd Amendment groups hold off on petitioning SCOTUS with 2nd Amendment cases until the court is more favorable in actually granting cert on a case?
Are we wasting good cases by sending them up to SCOTUS only to have them deny cert? SCOTUS hasn't taken a major 2nd Amendment case in years and is showing no signs that it wants to.
I don't know how long you have after a case is ruled on in the other courts before you petition it to the US Supreme Court but if you only have a certain amount of time that maybe why 2nd Amendment advocates are sending cases to SCOTUS even if they have almost no chance of being granted cert.
Shouldn't Pro-2nd Amendment groups hold off on petitioning SCOTUS with 2nd Amendment cases until the court is more favorable in actually granting cert on a case?