The mud was the only test that worried me that I might damage the gun.Wow M2! I don't think I have the heart to do that to mine.
M2 - is this the Mak you converted to a .22?The mud was the only test that worried me that I might damage the gun.
The gun was fully loaded with the hammer cocked. The idea was, You dropped your gun in the mud as you were ready to fire. Then you picked it up and immediately tried to fire it.
The mud between the hammer and firing pin prevented the hammer from hitting the firing pin on the first trigger pull. Immediately I pulled the trigger a second time and the gun fired and I shot the magazine dry.
Sorry I missed this post from you, gbellah - what I am referencing is this page from Makarov.com. The page addresses the questionThe best way to identify an EG is a circle inside a diamond symbol on the frame and slide. My EG Mak does not have "AY" in the serial number.
No.M2 - is this the Mak you converted to a .22?
In the early Makarov days, when I only had three or four Maks, everytime I let someone shoot my Maks they wanted it. Half the time I'd sell them the gun, then because I liked them so well and they were inexpensive I'd buy two more.Every once in a while, I try to talk Buck out of one of his, but he's not budging.
Did you mean the Makarov, or the banana?
SpecOp's - The trigger on my '83 Bugarian seems somewhat more loose than the one on my '61 East German - any thoughts?Think I'm going to get a replacement Hammer, Slide Catch, and safety, the finish is kinda worn on mine.
to have unfired Makarov's?