Just curious to know if any of you with laser sights have chosen to aim your laser directly parallel with the bore, rather than aiming it so that the beam intersects with the bore at a given distance?
It seems to me that since I have no idea at what distance I might need to take a shot, I would prefer to have the dot always be the same distance below point of impact--roughly 1/2" low on my Ruger LCR--at all likely distances (i.e. 50 feet or less). This of course ignores bullet trajectory, but I wouldn't expect the trajectory of a .38 +P bullet to drop much within 50 feet anyway. So long as I aim the laser dot 1/2" below my intended target, I should be pretty much dead on whether the target is 10 feet away or 50 feet away.
The alternative is to sight in the laser so that it intersects with the bullet trajectory at a specific distance, say, 25 feet. The problem there is that in a high-stress situation, I would have to first estimate the distance to target prior to the shot, then attempt to correct where I need to aim the dot based on whether my distance estimate is less than or greater than my "sighted in" intersection point.
Thoughts?
It seems to me that since I have no idea at what distance I might need to take a shot, I would prefer to have the dot always be the same distance below point of impact--roughly 1/2" low on my Ruger LCR--at all likely distances (i.e. 50 feet or less). This of course ignores bullet trajectory, but I wouldn't expect the trajectory of a .38 +P bullet to drop much within 50 feet anyway. So long as I aim the laser dot 1/2" below my intended target, I should be pretty much dead on whether the target is 10 feet away or 50 feet away.
The alternative is to sight in the laser so that it intersects with the bullet trajectory at a specific distance, say, 25 feet. The problem there is that in a high-stress situation, I would have to first estimate the distance to target prior to the shot, then attempt to correct where I need to aim the dot based on whether my distance estimate is less than or greater than my "sighted in" intersection point.
Thoughts?