Hey joetdj,
What follows is a quote of your last post:
"new lee loadmaster thought had every thing right checked powder drop after drop i think i must have loaded with powder hopper turned off have since mounted led for tired old eyes thought i seen powder in every one never had one failer in 20 years on single stage. But still shot these in a ruger vaquero no sound. at first thought primers not seated so tried primer again same click. suprised to see back of lead black. Hard to admit to such a stupid mistake"
Your original post was similar in that it consisted of five "sentences" which were made up of perhaps a dozen or more disconnected thoughts and subjects, but they were all run together and made it difficult for any reader to understand what you were trying to say.
From what you "said" in your two posts, it would seem you are too busy or too indifferent to spend the time necessary time to clarify your thoughts with punctuation and some semblance of reasonable grammar. It would also seem that you do not bother to think about what you want to say and then re-reading what you have written.
The whole idea of having grammatic "rules" for writing in any language is simply to facilitate the communication of ideas. The whole idea of having reloading "rules" is to facilitate safe reloading practices and safe results when using your reloaded ammo.
If your writing practices are any indication of your reloading practices, there may be a correlation there as to what is causing your problems. In short, if your reloading practices are as sloppy as your writing practices, it should not be a great surprise that you are having problems with your reloads.
It gives me no pleasure to write the critical remarks I made above. I really do not like the idea of making someone feel bad. However, I think what I have written is deserving of your attention and should be considered.
Best wishes,
Dave Wile