Single Action Defense

Status
Not open for further replies.
No. Far too many other, better options are available. Why handicap yourself?

That's fine if it's all you've got or you like it just because, but you're still hindering yourself. Stack the deck in your favor with every advantage you possibly can.
 
Yes, quite often, especially in cooler months. I don't consider it a handicap when 95% of my handgun shooting is with single action revolvers.
 
Yes, I've carried SAA 45LC/45ACP, and 44 Special. Got one in .38 Special that is pretty sweet. Depending on where and what I'm doing I even have a pocket size .22 Magnum.
 
Absolutely. I'm wearing a .45 Colt Blackhawk in a shoulder rig right now as my primary. Options are always good, and I try to tailor my choice of firearms for my activities of the day.

Although I don't see the platform itself as a hindrance, I also put in the work to have the skills and muscle memory to make the platform work.

I am also a strong believer in the New York Reload, and until I have an appropriate second Blackhawk and a double shoulder rig, I carry an M&P .40 in an IWB as well. Even I have no illusions as to the speed of a Blackhawk reload under stress, no matter how much I practice.

I spend too much time in more rural areas, and while a nice DA isn't unwelcome ( and can typically vary between a Model 10, or a Chief's special for me) I feel very comfortable with 6 hard-cast 250 grain in a moderate +p hand-load.

We've had Cougars in the city here, and most notably in the parking lot of Oregon Health Sciences University ( http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2013/05/ohsu_staff_on_the_lookout_for.html) and I also live less than a mile from the largest city park in the nation (Forest Park, search the St. John's Bridge if you want to see the lay of my neighborhood)

While the Willamette river provides a natural barrier to the big cats and Roosevelt Elk, a mile in the other direction is a massive wetland and our system of Sloughs. Thankfully my worst visitors have been some very angry raccoons (they ran me into the house like a scalded bunny) and a family of skunks.

I carry for multiple purposes, because I don't know what life will bring, and we'd all rather "Have, and not need" anyhow... Ya?
 
Last edited:
"Self defense" against what?

McCloud made it work, but for routine carry in the city, it's a poor choice.

For general purpose in the woods, including human defense, it can certainly work....if one puts in the time.

Before someone cites how fast some cowboy action shooters can fire, keep in mind they're firing extremely light loads, unsuitable for defense.
 
There's a Super Blackhawk in a drawer right here. 44 Special load with 180 gr jhp.
 
Not for self defense in the city...

...but as a woods gun I feel it is perfectly viable for me.



I am relatively new to the world of single action revolvers and don't have nearly enough muscle memory yet to consider my Blackhawk for SD.
 
Someone with a SA is at a great disadvantage in a gunfight. There's a reason the military and police don't use them.
 
Paul7, The reason the police and military dont use them is becausetechnology advances and they wanted the latest and greatest. That doesnt take away from a Single actions' ability to fight.
 
Single action carry? Why yes I do from time to time.

HANDGUNS12-31-07-0006.jpg

It's as quick as any single action for the first six. And if that's not enough, I have a smoke screen to hide my retreat.:neener:
 
There's a reason the military and police don't use them.
That's a simplistic view and irrelevant point. I don't make personal choices based on what the government does. Unless it's to do the opposite.
 
Paul7, The reason the police and military dont use them is becausetechnology advances and they wanted the latest and greatest. That doesnt take away from a Single actions' ability to fight.
What if the BG adversary has also taken advantage of the latest and greatest technology advances? He will reload a 15 round magazine a lot faster than you will reload a SA with 6 rounds (especially the cap and ball revolver shown in post #16). Not to mention he'll be pulling the trigger much faster. That is fact, not 'simplistic'.

I've got one SA .45, and while it is an interesting historical piece, I'll probably be selling it. I want my guns to be useful in a SHTF situation.
 
I keep all my handguns loaded, regardless of the caliber, action, or intended purpose.

So, if a single action revolver is at hand when I need defending.....

I'm using it for self defense!
(This thread needs some pics!)

026_zps7fae75b5.gif
039_zps86119f36.gif
032_zps2e4f03dd.gif
IMG_0793.gif
 
That is fact, not 'simplistic'.
The "fact" is that the outcome of the gunfight will be FAR more dependent on YOU than the type of weapon on your hip. That thing between your ears is much more important than whatever you're carrying on your belt. Personally, I will take the weapon I'm most proficient with 99.99% of the time. Proficiency trumps equipment.


I've got one SA .45, and while it is an interesting historical piece, I'll probably be selling it. I want my guns to be useful in a SHTF situation.
Perhaps you should spend more time with it before passing judgement on those of us who have lived and breathed with them for 30yrs.
 
I have an 1 1/8" .22 Magnum NAA Mini-Revolver that I occasionally pocket carry and also carry in an arm-band rig when I run. For running, I have long held off on carrying at all- primarily due to comfort and other concerns- but recently decided that it would be a better idea to carry than to not. The NAA is comfortable enough and is significantly easier to carry (concealed, accessibly, and comfortably) in that situation than anything else that I own.
 
The "fact" is that the outcome of the gunfight will be FAR more dependent on YOU than the type of weapon on your hip. That thing between your ears is much more important than whatever you're carrying on your belt. Personally, I will take the weapon I'm most proficient with 99.99% of the time. Proficiency trumps equipment.



Perhaps you should spend more time with it before passing judgement on those of us who have lived and breathed with them for 30yrs.
For two people of equal gunfighting ability, my money will be on the one with the higher capacity, easier to reload weapon.
 
Perhaps you should spend more time with it before passing judgement on those of us who have lived and breathed with them for 30yrs.

+1

Or try 40 plus years

Gotta remember this is the internet and anonymous posters get their share of post time. Just got to wade through the content. The only thing that draws more "experts" :neener: than an SAA thread are the caliber wars.
 
For two people of equal gunfighting ability, my money will be on the one with the higher capacity, easier to reload weapon.
My money will be on the one that makes his first shot count.


Gotta remember this is the internet and anonymous posters get their share of post time.
Yep! Where folks with hardly an interest in something are fully free to express an opinion. I've been obsessed with single actions for most of my life and have a scant three dozen. I'd love to know what somebody who doesn't handload and has one single action (back in December???) they're going to sell is going to tell you or me about them. Let alone what a skilled shooter is capable of with them.
 
That's a simplistic view and irrelevant point. I don't make personal choices based on what the government does. Unless it's to do the opposite.
this ^^, and probably my favorite comment ive read on here:)
ive always thought that you should train and get proficient with whatever youve got/or like. In any situation thats about all you can do as you dont know what a BG is bringing to the situation. Im not saying people have to use a SAA for defense anymore than im saying they need a Glock, being proficient hopefully gives you an advantage. just my opinion
and if the capacity worries a person, have 2 SAA or maybe a shotgun, levergun etc ;-)
Regards
Gene
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top