SMITH AND WESSON 242

Status
Not open for further replies.

johnny blaze

Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2006
Messages
381
I recently found a Smith and Wesson 242. I never even knew that they ever made one.
It was already sold.
Anyone here own one? Any comments?
I know that it is a 7 shot, 38 special, snub nose with a light weight frame weighing 19 ounces.
Was only made for one year.
I think that I want one.:D
 
I found another member's 242 acouple of subjects up. I believe they were made for only one year. No "locK'. I kinda like them.

Look under the subbies topic.
 
Smith & Wesson Model 242

I just read your post and hope you are still out there. I have a 242. I like the 7 shot cylinder because I like to shoot it six times and then say, "Now, I know what you're thinking...you're asking yourself, "has he shot 5 or 6 rounds"...so do you feel lucky punk??? Cuz the answer doesn't matter cuz I STILL have a 7th shot!" LoL...anyway, I still have the gun if you are interested and still out there. Signed, Kvac.
 
Picture a 296... but put 7 smaller holes in the Ti cylinder... and a smaller barrel bore... voila, the 242!

Kind of neat - I nearly bought a LN (no box) for $350 five years back - but I had bought a 296 new some six months earlier that year - for that price. They are at least that dear now - in poor shape. Check the cast-in-place cylinder stop - that Ti cylinder can pare it away with one 'Hollywood rap' of the ejector rod. Also, S&W C.S. reps told me, 5+ years back, not to load my lead rounds in my 296 - I wonder if that means the 242 is susceptible to lead spattering/cutting of the topstrap over the b/c gap, too? Also, cleaning the Ti cylinder is tedious - one can't use abrasives in any way due to the surface treatment. Still - a neat .38!

Stainz
 
Was a great gun ! This thing handles even +p+ with aplomb.+p 158 grainers are very comfortable, mine is twice as accurate as my .44spl 296 (maybe because it has half the recoil?) so I shoot it twice as much! Here's a comparison (hint:I tuck one in EACH back pocket sometimes!):

P1010501.gif
 
S&W Model 242

The gun is in excellent condition. I bought it new in 2001 and haven't even shot 3 boxes of shells through it (150 rounds) in seven years. There is a minor scratch on the back of it as you will see in the pictures. Since they were only made one year they are very rare and since mine is the only one for sale I am selling it for $600.
 
Last edited:
kvac,

Two posts - and you are selling something. No location, either. Well, welcome to a great place to discuss revolvers!

Well, regardless, the 242 is neat. I was saddened some years ago to see one in a sale bucket atop a display case at a pawn shop - tagged $250. I guess that, and the earlier one at a show I mentioned in my earlier post, are the only ones I've ever seen. The tempermental nature of Ti cylinders has resulted in my collection of such cylindered fare at one - my 296. Other than novelty, the overgrown sibling to my 642 has little interest here. With prices as they are, I bet you'll get your price, if you 'find' the right venue (Try the S&W Forum.). For what your's would cost to get here, I could buy a new 2.5"/3" 686+, a far better choice to my thinking... my NSHO.

Stainz
 
Stainz

Stainz, I don't know what you mean by your comment about 2 posts and I am wanting to sell...is there something wrong with that? Like I stated before, I haven't shot the pistol that much...about 140 times but it has never given me any trouble. You mentioned yours jammed...there is statement in an addendum to the owners manual that you have to be specific on which ammo you use. Do you use only jacketed rounds because that's what it says. Maybe with the .44 you have it just has a bigger kick? I listed my location...I'm a Texan and when I bought the gun from Kentucky or Tennessee I don't remember it costing that much to ship so I'm not sure what you are talking about on cost to ship. You should have bought that gun at the pawn shop for $250...was it in as good of shape as mine?
 
Stainz, I don't know what you mean by your comment about 2 posts and I am wanting to sell...is there something wrong with that?
kvac,
I'm not trying to speak for Stainz but I will answer your question. The High Road has a specific section for selling items named the "Trading Post" with even more specific forums to break things down and make it easy to list and find things you want. (it's the section at the botom of the main page) No one is supposed to sell things in other forums and especially in someone else's thread . Also, there are rules that must be followed if you want to sell here. The first rule is, "ALL THREADS IN ANY BUY, SELL, TRADE FORUM MUST HAVE THE LOCATION IN THE THREAD TITLE OR THE THREAD WILL BE DELETED. It is the responsibility of both parties of any transaction to comply with all applicable laws and regulations."

I know you're new and probably didn't know any of this but I do suggest you read the rules of the forum before you go any further.
 
ArchAngelCD,

Thank you for stepping in there for me - you did a fine job. I was just trying to give the new fellow a gentle reminder that we are a discussion sub-forum here.

kvac,

First, I have never had a jam in my 296. I did experiment with five 240gr LSWCs once, pulling the remaining rounds after each shot to measure their respective OALs. They 'grew' with each shot, the fifth one's bullet, when it was it's turn, being mostly free of it's crimp. Had it been a six shot, it would have likely jammed. That experiment violated the '200gr MAX' on the barrel's side and the verbal suggestion from two calls to S&W, when I had been told that they don't reccomend lead bullets. Those were my only lead rounds - and only >200gr. My 296 has seen >1,500 rounds through it.

I don't doubt your 242 is in fine shape, but both of the ones I saw were just over five years ago. My experience with .38s & .357Ms didn't begin until 9/03, having nothing smaller than a .44 revolver prior to that time. The two I saw were a novelty - and I looked at them thinking they might be another 296 - until I saw the holes. BTW, the one in the sale bucket was battered - an ignoble way to sell such a fine revolver!

As far as shipping, a sale would have to go overnite ffl to ffl, of course. That makes s/h run $30-$50 - plus an ffl transfer fee on my end - $15-$40, depending on the storefront. Now, add in the AL 4% sales tax they 'might' recover... your gun could cost $669+. I can buy a new 2.5"-3" 686+, with s/t, for less - a better choice for me.

I would hold on to the 242, if I could. The low production numbers mean it will be worth more as time goes by. It is a neat revolver.

Stainz
 
S & W 242 7 shot .38 +P -- great gun if you can find

I bought one for my wife and for occaisional carry. She thinks it is too big for her purse, but she dodes like it a lot. (She just put a new Centenial on layaway for her B-day!)

I find that the 242 has become my default everyday carry for some time now. It is not a tiny gun, but even loaded the weight is negligible, and with a pocket holster, or IWB rig it is the easiest thing I have ever carried.

They seem to be very hard to find. I have heard that they were only made for about a year, and that some of them do have the saftey lock. (Mine doesn't)

It is a scandium ally frame with a 7 shoot titanium cylinder, with stainless barrel with an alloy shroud.

Recoil is sharp, and the manual says that there are restrictions on which ammo can be used, however, neither my wife nor myself have a problem shooting it. Felt recoil is on par with my blued 2" Taurus .44 spl, and considerably less than my "2 Taurus .41 Total Titanium with heavy loads.

If you can find one, I would buy it if you can afford it, if only for the collector value, as I feel that it will be at least niche collectable even though it is not a traditional S&W item.

I really wish Smith would consider making a new run of these every few years or so, as I am sure they would sell, and I personally would like another one so I could retire my current one as a keeper. As an aside -- at first I was very concerned that the various alloys an this revolver would show more wear than a tradidtional steel gun, an even though I try an take good care of it, I do not treat it any better then my other guns. However, it shows practically no wear at all, and I am very pleased with how the finish and looks of this gun have held up, and while it has not been shot much (Less than 200 rounds so far) it has been carried a lot, and is often put into and removed from various holsters. Barrel and frame show no wear, and fewer scratch marks than I had expected at first.

The reason I mention this, is that at first, I had expected it to show wear more than my other guns do. (It seemed very toy like at first, due I assume to the -- different -- finish it has, and the weight, or lack of it) But after having carried it as much as I have -- I must say, this is a serious carry item. 7 shots of 38, less weight loaded than my Glock 19 empty.

Dissapears in a pocket (At least if you are fairly large like me, and wear loose kakies or cargo shorts like I do mostly...) Nice for a coat pocket too, and an IWB holster feels like it is empty. That being said, understand that this is not a tiny gun. It is I think an L-frame with what seems to be a J-frame grip. It is a fairly bulky frame for the size of grip that it has.

If you can find one, this is a gun that needs serious consideration. It does have some drawbacks. Minimal sights and cartidge, sharp recoil, itty bitty grip, and larger than you think it is becuase of the lack of weight, but it has a lot going for it as well. Adequate power, 7 shots, reliability, and light light light.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top