It depends on how "done got brokded" your gun is.How are they to shoot??
They have heavy triggers, a short sight radius, small almost inadequate sights, and snappy recoil...
I own a 642-1 (no lock) which is basically the same gun, just with stainless instead of blued parts.
These guns do have advantages... They are light, small, and easy to carry in the pocket. They can be loaded with light practice rounds or stout +P ammo with no concerns of function like you might have with an auto pistol. Additionally, revolvers are close to 100% reliable.
S&W backs them with a 100% warranty. They will fix any problems and pay shipping both ways.
Edmo
Carried one, a 642, for 15+ years as a BUG, before it was replaced by a Kahr CW9meatballs said:Anyone have one of these? How are they to shoot?
Damage it too much, and they won't do anything for you. Ask me how I know.
It depends on how "done got brokded" your gun is.
Damage it too much, and they won't do anything for you. Ask me how I know.
It isn't so much that the trigger is heavy, but it's travel is too short.guyfromohio said:I found the "not a behinner's gun" comment odd until I thought About it. I would agree. The trigger is heavy, but very predictable