I also learned that it is a weapon for the experienced expert, certainly not the weapon of choice for a beginner.
Roy Huntington had a great column in American Hangunner a while back offering up the same sentiments.
If there so bad, it's hard to imagine why they keep selling them. Seems to me like shooters would have given up on them decades ago.
He's not saying that they're
bad, just that it's not a great weapon for a beginner to start out with. I tend to agree, but there are exceptions to every rule. I have a relative - small, female, not very experienced with guns. She took quite a shine to the Ruger LCR, with boot grips, in .38+P (Hornady Critical Defense, my understanding is they're not exactly the "hottest" load out there).
But with a different gun, lacking the LCRs ergonomics? Or in .357 mag? I don't think that would have been a pleasant experience for her.
My first experience with a snub was years ago a borrowed gun, Smith Airweight with standard .38s. I didn't care for it a lot. The owner of the gun would have liked it even less if she'd ever have gotten around to shooting it. She's my aunt, and after my uncle died in an accident, my cousin bought her the gun for protection.
I imagine a similar story playing out frequently - "not-really-gun-guy Male X buys not-at-all-gun-girl Female Y a gun because of Z." And with the gun oftentimes being a snubby. I'm not saying it can NEVER turn out well, but I think it turning out well is the exception rather than the norm. Mind you, I'm a big proponent of the revolver as a "first gun," but there are better first guns than a snubby, especially lightweight centerfire ones.