Plan-B
Member
I just finished reading the following 2 threads about unwittingly receiving LEO magazines.
http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?s=&threadid=1141
http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?s=&threadid=1451
Obviously there is a substantial gray area between civil disobedience in defense of our RKBA and the law abiding citizens we all want to be. I was not surprised that there were so many who wanted to immediately hang the seller of such magazines, such is human nature. Nor was I really that surprised that there were many that wanted to give the seller the benefit of the doubt in that he may have made an error. But I do wonder what prevailing opinion would be should we find out (hypothetically of course) that the seller knowingly sold the "illegal magazines" to a civilian. But that's not the purpose of this post.
What I'm curious to know, is what people would think if the table was turned? There are many guns that were released after the 1994 ban and do not have legitimate pre-ban magazines available. Say someone made an effort to seek out and purchase full capacity magazines that are LEO only. I'm not talking about someone forging a law enforcement letterhead, just someone buying the "contraband" through a less than scrupulous seller. Should we vilify this individual because he disagrees with a law that most (all?) of us also disagree with?
I guess I've rambled long enough...
http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?s=&threadid=1141
http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?s=&threadid=1451
Obviously there is a substantial gray area between civil disobedience in defense of our RKBA and the law abiding citizens we all want to be. I was not surprised that there were so many who wanted to immediately hang the seller of such magazines, such is human nature. Nor was I really that surprised that there were many that wanted to give the seller the benefit of the doubt in that he may have made an error. But I do wonder what prevailing opinion would be should we find out (hypothetically of course) that the seller knowingly sold the "illegal magazines" to a civilian. But that's not the purpose of this post.
What I'm curious to know, is what people would think if the table was turned? There are many guns that were released after the 1994 ban and do not have legitimate pre-ban magazines available. Say someone made an effort to seek out and purchase full capacity magazines that are LEO only. I'm not talking about someone forging a law enforcement letterhead, just someone buying the "contraband" through a less than scrupulous seller. Should we vilify this individual because he disagrees with a law that most (all?) of us also disagree with?
I guess I've rambled long enough...