Specific question about the brace injunction

[Jeff H]

So, from this article, the injunction is nationwide.

Pistol Brace Regulation Blocked in Nationwide Injunction from Amarillo Federal Judge

A Biden administration rule redefining pistol braces as highly regulated short-barreled rifles has been blocked by a federal judge in Texas.

thetexan.news

Like a lot of us, I applied for a stamp under the amnesty period and received ATF approval. Then I subsequently took the brace off and installed a proper stock. Where does this leave me with the injunction in place? Do I need to put the brace back on for now until this is settled or am I still allowed to keep the stock on?

 

[warnerwh]

Colion Noir explains it well: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3WoUUVvSLBE

 

[bearcreek]

So, from this article, the injunction is nationwide.

Pistol Brace Regulation Blocked in Nationwide Injunction from Amarillo Federal Judge

A Biden administration rule redefining pistol braces as highly regulated short-barreled rifles has been blocked by a federal judge in Texas.

thetexan.news

Like a lot of us, I applied for a stamp under the amnesty period and received ATF approval. Then I subsequently took the brace off and installed a proper stock. Where does this leave me with the injunction in place? Do I need to put the brace back on for now until this is settled or am I still allowed to keep the stock on?

In a nutshell, you have a registered SBR. The injunction doesn't change or effect that.

 

[Anchorite]

I would want to read the order, not just the news articles wherein a journalist is explaining it. I would never rely on the “media” to get it right. I grit my teeth every time one of these channels gets their “chief legal correspondent “ to opine as to some happening in the legal world.

 

[bearcreek]

I would want to read the order, not just the news articles wherein a journalist is explaining it. I would never rely on the “media” to get it right. I grit my teeth every time one of these channels gets their “chief legal correspondent “ to opine as to some happening in the legal world.

Here you go. The order doesn't mention the "pistols" that people registered as SBR's though, so it's not real helpful in that regard. The burden of proof here would be on someone who thought that the SBR's registered during the "amnesty" fall under some other category than all the other registered SBR's.

 

[DoubleMag]

Re: pistols. The order does not mention other things also, such as sights etc.

But the order is stayed ''in it's entirety'' (see Colons video at 3:06min ) which certainly does imply that the particular item e.g sights are stayed. Also therefore, the term pistols.

Back to OP, I would say in layman's terms you are GTG if you've already received your stamp and are among the 250,000+- persons with a new SBR. My ? would be, with the entire rule stayed, including any preemptive verbage covering ''what happens in the interim of submission to receiving (stamp) '' , are persons who have NOT yet received their stamp(s) vacated?

 

[Jeff H]

Back to OP, I would say in layman's terms you are GTG if you've already received your stamp and are among the 250,000+- persons with a new SBR.

Thanks to all that replied, but I did have a very specific question here. All of our stamps were not just approved. They were all approved with conditions.



If it is Pursuant to the final rule and the final rule has an injunction on it, my thought is that I no longer have an SBR??????? Not sure if this is the correct line of thinking so that is why I asked the question.

 

[Frank Ettin]

This is the sort of question for which the op really needs his own lawyer.