Speer Gold Dots 125g +P vs 135g +P - Results

Status
Not open for further replies.

TEX

Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2003
Messages
90
Thought this might interest anyone that has a 38 revolver and was considering the Speer Gold Dot 135g +P or the 125g +P. I was testing defensive loads for my wife’s S&W Model-10 with fixed sights. She hates magnums and hates autos, so this is basically what she is stuck with and has grown use to shooting over the years. I tested a number of different 38-Special defensive and targets loads to match up a decent defensive load and practice load that would hit very near the point of aim. Because the Model-10 has fixed sights adjusting for vertical or horizontal deviation was not an option. In defensive loads, I tested Corbon’s 125g +P DPX round, Winchester 125g +P Silvertips, Remington Golden Saber 125g +P, Federal Hydrashok 125g +P, and both the 125g and 135g +P Speer Gold Dot rounds. It is my understanding that the 135g Gold Dot was specifically made for short 2” barrels, but I figured that if that was the case, then it should show pretty good velocity and low muzzle flash in a 4-inch barrel – I was right.

When I shoot for groups, I use a target with 10-mm grid squares. I measure the average distance of deviation from the vertical and horizontal lines intersecting the point of aim, to arrive at the group center, and then average the distance from each of the 10 shots to the group’s center. If any one shot is 200% or more of that average, I throw it out as a flyer, and then recalculate the average. So if you see a measurement such as 3/4“ associated with the round, it means that at 15-yards in a very slow and careful off hand shot, the rounds hit, on average, that far away from the groups center. I know most folks measure the widest stretch between the two farthest rounds, but that has never made much sense to me. You could have 9 rounds that made one big clover leaf and then one stray 2-inches away from the clover leaf and it would be called a 2-inch group, which would not exactly reflect just how tight a group the round was capable of making. By the way, I had only one flyer, a Blazer 158g LRN, and it was an obvious off shot. I just loaded up another round and left that one out of the calculations. No other flyers discarded to arrive at averages.

I did not chronograph all of the rounds. Just the two I finally decided on as the best, which both happened to be the Speer Gold Dots (125g +P & 135g +P). They both hit about the same spot (maybe 1/4” apart) and only hit about 1/2” to 1” above the point of aim and 1/4” to the left. I figured that this was just fine as when firing DAO rapidly, you would probably pull the rounds down and to the right ever so slightly. Also, this difference would all but disappear at fighting distances of 7-yards and under.

The 125g Gold Dot does not have as wide open a hollow point as the 135g. At 15-yards the average distance from group center for 10-rounds per weight, was 3/4“ on both loads. Here is the kicker. The velocity difference between the two different loads was only 2.2 fps. The choice seemed obvious- the 135g Gold Dot. The fact that it is heavier should mean it would penetrate deeper, but this may be offset by the wide nose, which I assume would open a little faster than the 125g bullet. This would cause it to offer resistance earlier in its track. Either way the 135g has more energy – if that matters? I really wish I had a 2” to test it from to see how much additional velocity the extra 2-inches of the Model-10 provided. The Magtech 125g FMJ turned out to hit on the same vertical line as both Gold Dot loads, and only 1/2“ lower - at 15 yards. Winchester White Box 138g FMJ, Sellier & Bellot 158g FMJ, and Blazer 158g LRN all hit on nearly the same vertical line (within 1" of each side) and none were more than 1.75” vertically hi or low from the impact of the Gold Dots. Now if I can just find a place to get the Magtech really cheap.

Defensive Loads

Federal Hydrashok 125g +P (7/8”)
Speer Gold Dot 135g +P (3/4”) Average speed 948.6 fps (max dev 27 fps)
Speer Gold Dot 125g +P (3/4”) Average speed 950.8 fps (max dev 34 fps)
Remington Golden Saber 125g +P (7/8”)
CorBon DPX 125g +P (3/4”)
Winchester Silvertip 125g +P (7/8”)

Practice/Target Loads

Blazer Aluminum Case 158g LRN (1”)
Fiocchi 158g FML (1”)
Sellier & Bellot 158g FMJ (1”)
Magtech 158g LRN (7/8”)
Magtech 125g FMJ (7/8”)
Winchester White Box 138g FMJ (3/4”)
Federal American Eagle 130g FMJ (3/4”)

TEX
 
This is very good information. Thank you.

38+P rounds overall tend to lose less than 50fps for each inch of barrel. Somewhere around 40fps seems to be common. We've been told by Speer that the 135 will expand at any speed past 825fps or so, so...out of a 2", looks like you'll get enough speed at normal defense ranges and probably do OK out to 50 yards in a snubbie.

In THIS gun this load will do great. The various pictures I've seen of 135gr. 38+Ps expanded after firing from a snubbie (from two different test sources) shows that yeah, it expands, but not as "deep" as various other Gold Dots I've seen post-expansion photos of.

In other words, the 135 from a 2" barrel is at the lower end of it's performance envelope. It won't be "overdriven" in a 4" or even a 6" I suspect; Gold Dots are unusually tolerant of being "overdriven" and I suspect you'd need to shoot 'em out of a carbine to even have the possibility of overspeed :).

I have the 135 +Ps loaded in my personal snubbie right now.
 
The 135 gr Gold Dots are specifically engineered for snubbies. Out of longer barrels, they overexpand, which in this case means a smaller recovered diameter, because the expanded petals get smashed flat against the sides of the bullet. On the other hand, they do penetrate pretty well because of that, but you can expect diameters around .55" instead of .6"+.

125 gr Golden Sabers are a bit flaky and tend to underpenetrate. Hydra-Shoks almost never expand through heavy clothing, and usually underpenetrate when they do expand. Silvertips are the same. Cor-Bon DPX, I don't know, but I don't really trust Cor-Bon. I've heard bad things about their quality control.

http://www.firearmstactical.com/ammo_data/38special.htm

You may be better off getting some Remington 158 gr LHPs. The classic FBI load, but more consistent through heavy clothing than the Winchester ones.
 
Interesting report. Thanks.

Jim March,

What do you like for a 3" barrel? I'm torn between the 158 gr +P .38 loads I've been using and the Speer 135 gr +P .38 SB loads. The 3" is really "betwixt and between" so I'm not sure which might work best. I did notice the 135 loads are "snappier" recoil-wise, than the 158 loads.
 
I'm not sure I agree with Trevor re: overexpansion in longer barrels for the Gold Dot 135 38+P. To my eyes, it's just *starting* to expand out of a 2" barrel, I think the little pup is good to go out of a 3" and I strongly suspect will do fine out to 6" or so. At some point yeah, it WILL fail by going too fast but remember, Gold Dot jackets are really a heavy plating on top of the lead, they seriously resist jacket separation which is what usually causes an expanded bullet nose to "collapse" at too high a speed.
 
I'm just relating information from actual test results. From a snubnose, the expanded diameter was around 0.6", and penetration was 12-13". From a 4" gun, expanded diameter was around 0.55", and penetration was 14"+. The ones fired from the 4" barrel had the petals smashed flat against the sides of the bullet.

The 135 grain Gold Dots are specifically engineered to work in a certain velocity window. They're a lot less robustly made than the other Gold Dots because of that. Most Gold Dots will "starfish" if driven above their velocity window, but the 135 grain ones, since the petals are weaker, just get flattened. They still perform totally adequately, but there may be better choices. Especially the FBI load.

I'll look for a link later, have to go do some "real life" stuff. If you want to look yourself, do some searches on the http://www.tacticalforums.com terminal ballistics forum.
 
RyanM,

According to Speer, your information is incorrect. I asked them about this some time ago and I was informed that even though the 135 was designed with the 2 inch barrel in mind, they still considered it the best .38 load they make for any barrel length. Some police departments that still carry service revolvers to some extend use the 135 grain load, for example the NYPD for whom the load was designed.
 
I like the 158gr +P lead hollow points that Winchester and Remington still load. They run at the same speed as your 125 and 135gr do (close to 950 fps) and weigh much more. They also shoot to point of aim in all of my smith revolvers (I was told that S&W makes their fixed sight guns to shoot to POA with 158gr ammunition). This is the load that the FBI used for many many years in their 3" K-frames.

Glad you found a load you like :)
 
One sign that Speer thinks their 135 gr Gold Dot +P is also appropriate for a 4" gun is that they list ballistic info for it in the official materials for the round. They give velocity figures for a 4" S&W Model 10 right along with a 2" snubby. As I recall they got velocities in the same realm as the 948 fps figure that Tex reports above with the same load in the same gun.

If the expansion floor for the 135 GD is 825 fps velocity, I would be somewhat surprised if 950 fps turned out to be in the "overexpansion" zone. But I'm willing to be shown the contrary.

Coincidentally, I just shot a box of 135 gr Gold Dots through my 4" Model 10 this morning. Assuming that the bullet is, indeed, still within its performance window at that barrel length, this is an excellent combo. Recoil and flash are both very controllable and it's accurate. I would be hard-pressed to come up with a better setup for a novice or non-"gun person" who isn't drastically recoil-adverse (i.e., not in the arthritic/invalid category) and wants a credible defense handgun.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top