So in summary the Colorado law sells out the rights of its citizens but protects government entities (law enforcement, armed govt employees etc.) as well as the tax revenue from selling products out of state. I fail to see how this is good for gun rights by any stretch of the imagination nor would I use the Colorado law as an example of how everything is okay and we should just calm down and be quiet. I also fail to see how a company that makes a political statement against this should be looked at negatively in any way. If more people in this country (whether it be companies or individual citizens) would make a small effort to do the right thing even if it entailed a small sacrafice, we wouldn't be in this current mess that we are in as a nationComplete BS. Nothing in Colorado House Bill 13-1224 bans the manufacture of magazines for sale outside of Colorado. See section 3:
(3) THE OFFENSE DESCRIBED IN SUBSECTION (1) OF THIS SECTION
SHALL NOT APPLY TO:
(a) AN ENTITY, OR ANY EMPLOYEE THEREOF ENGAGED IN HIS OR HER
EMPLOYMENT DUTIES, THAT MANUFACTURES LARGE-CAPACITY MAGAZINES
WITHIN COLORADO EXCLUSIVELY FOR TRANSFER TO, OR ANY LICENSED GUN
DEALER, AS DEFINED IN SECTION 12-26.1-106 (6), C.R.S., OR ANY EMPLOYEE
THEREOF ENGAGED IN HIS OR HER OFFICIAL EMPLOYMENT DUTIES, THAT
SELLS LARGE-CAPACITY MAGAZINES EXCLUSIVELY TO:
(I) A BRANCH OF THE ARMED FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES;
(II) A DEPARTMENT, AGENCY, OR POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE
STATE OF COLORADO, OR OF ANY OTHER STATE, OR OF THE UNITED STATES
GOVERNMENT;
(III) A FIREARMS RETAILER FOR THE PURPOSE OF FIREARMS SALES
CONDUCTED OUTSIDE THE STATE;
(IV) A FOREIGN NATIONAL GOVERNMENT THAT HAS BEEN APPROVED
FOR SUCH TRANSFERS BY THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT; OR
(V) AN OUT-OF-STATE TRANSFEREE WHO MAY LEGALLY POSSESS A
LARGE-CAPACITY MAGAZINE
http://www.leg.state.co.us/clics/cl...E62E6F87257B0100813CB5?Open&file=1224_enr.pdf
Last edited: