"BTW, there's a great Nylon 66 article at American Rifleman."
Thanks for posting that, Bob. A great article and wonderful Rifle. I bought one in the early sixties and still have it. It's never jammed and is a fine shooter.
I honestly can't think of any metal on plastic contact with a Glock aside from a few rotating pieces. Certainly nothing with a big friction component.
Other than possible incidental contact, the answer is no. The steel slide contacts steel rails that are molded into the polymer frame.Huh? Isn't the steel slide in contact with the polymer body?
The steel rails are molded right into the polymer frame. It's possible that the rails could loosen from the frame, but that seems to be a very rare occurrence. I've not heard of an incident like that with Glocks, or any other similarly constructed pistol for that matter. I have heard of the steel rails breaking but that's not a common occurrence either.If it's on steel slides, what about the holes where the steel is connected to the polymer frame?
Maybe because they have to carry them around all day with spare mags along with the rest of their duty gear...for years. <edit>I will never understand why someone would choose thin stamped steel "rails" molded into a piece of plastic over a full solid steel frame <edit>
Send me one and i will test it for you. A few years on top of my roof in mesa az should settle that question. I often think about doing torture tests on various highly reguarded products that are supposed to be ultra durable. I just dont want to spend the dough. Most of them are fairly expensive. Especially in the fire arms realm.lso I have wondered about the effect of UV rays on a polymer pistol. My guns don't get left out in the sun so I'm sure its not a problem.
Academically speaking do UV rays have an effect on the polymers that are typically used in firearms
It's going to come as a surprise, I know, but the plastics makers know about the things that cause plastics to degrade and, for the most part have figured out ways to reduce the degradation to acceptable levels. One firearm manufacturer tested their frame material and determined that if you leave your firearm in the sun for 100 years the degradation will still not be sufficient to affect function.I have wondered about the effect of UV rays on a polymer pistol. My guns don't get left out in the sun so I'm sure its not a problem.
Academically speaking do UV rays have an effect on the polymers that are typically used in firearms...
theyre marketed as being "lightweight" and "corrosion resistant".. but these are basically just buzz words to convince you that youre getting a better product by accepting plastic
my point is they push out those phrases and rely so heavily on them to sell pistols.. i personally have no problems carrying a heavier handgun and unless you COMPLETELY neglect your pistol youre not going to have corrosion issues..I understand your point in your post, but "lightweight" and "corrosion resistant" are qualities that people actively search for when it comes to firearms meant to fill a carry role. I wouldn't necessarily call tem buzzwords.
When I think buzzword, I think "space age", "futuristic", and "tactical".
It's all marketing of course.... just saying
ask your heirs in the great beyond?.. polymer pistols have BARELY been around 30 years, theres no proof or evidence theyll last as long as steel while we have examples of steel weapons well over 100 years old that still function flawlessly.. when polymer pistols make it to 100-150 years old and still function, then we can make the claim they last as long@ Gunmaster post #25: Same here. most Glock bashers don't know what they are talking about. If one doesn't like them that's fine, their choice. They are accurate, super reliable, easy to assemble and disassemble even blind folded. Parts galore, although except for sights mine are usually stock. Maybe a different trigger bar, maybe a barrel. LEOs get money for new ones all the time, so they get turned in for new all the time. As far as the plastic wearing out, you will have to ask your heirs in the great beyond.
That said, there are lots of nice guns out there, and I own them as well. If you don't like Glocks for what ever reason, no problem. But to try to say they are not effective is silly. And for those of you that are in the "don't think they even make a good club" let me slap you with one and you will change your mind there pronto as well. Many hammers have plastic handles too!
Just sayin
Russellc
Years of longevity is immaterial. 1,000 rounds shot over 100 years in nothing compared to 10,000 rounds shot in 10 years. By the time a firearm has discharged that many rounds the cost any replacement parts is far, Far outweighed by the cost of ammunition and other consumables.ask your heirs in the great beyond?.. polymer pistols have BARELY been around 30 years, theres no proof or evidence theyll last as long as steel while we have examples of steel weapons well over 100 years old that still function flawlessly.. when polymer pistols make it to 100-150 years old and still function, then we can make the claim they last as long
multiple old military 1911s have confirmed round counts beyond 500,000.. that being said its not the steel components such as the rails that will prevent plastic pistols from lasting as long but the chemical properties of nylon 6, as well as certain biological conditions that lead to the degredation of the polymers over time.. not to mention its low melting point which can cause the plastics to warp with enough heat that can be produced by a large number of household itemsYears of longevity is immaterial. 1,000 rounds shot over 100 years in nothing compared to 10,000 rounds shot in 10 years. By the time a firearm has discharged that many rounds the cost any replacement parts is far, Far outweighed by the cost of ammunition and other consumables.
There's a Glock 17 out there with over 300,000 (yes, Three Hundred Thousand) rounds through it. Where's the steel framed pistol to compare to that?
http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/showthread.php?t=360611
considering simply accidently leaving your pistol on your household radiator will melt it, fires will destroy it, a double-charge round going off will total the frame.. even if you avoid all these things, you still cant avoid the aging process and properties present in all plastics, including the nylon 6 polymers most (including glock) polymer pistols are made from so for this reason i doubt you'll be passing one on too too many heirs
well, then blame the people who said their heirs will have the same glocks they have.. i was merely pointing out the fact that plastic generally ages unfavorably compared to other materials like steel and therefor will probably never last as long over a given time frameAccidentally leaving your gun on a radiator......:come on. Fires and double charged loads will damage and destroy a lot of guns including magnum caliber revolvers. So using these ideas as justification for your dislike of polymer guns rings hollow. There's nothing wrong with disliking them purely based on your opinion. That's cool if you don't like them man, and I agree that in many regards and roles, all steel guns are superior choices. But you're really stretching on your remarks regarding their inferiority.
Also you are assuming everyone cares about leaving guns to their heirs. Well, not all of us do. My heirs won't care a bit. You know why? Because I have none.
Freud said sometime a cigar is just a cigar. There is no extra or implied meaning. Well, some times a gun is just a gun and a tool is just a tool. For many of us, polymer guns are just a tool and when a tool wears out I fix it if I can, or replace it when I can't. I sure don't worry if my heirs will cherish it.