The reason makers don't offer a straight pull action is simple: The public will not buy them. Gun buyers are steeped in tradition, not engineering, and could care less about the improvements made over the last 100 years in rifles.
Ask a bolt gun buyer if they would consider an AR in the same caliber, you get bruquesly dismissed. What where you thinking?
And yet, the Stoner bolt design would be great for a straight pull. Add a side charger handle to the bolt, like the ASA design, remove the gas, chop the bolt carrier to expose the firing pin, use a trigger group with hammer, 3-5 round mag well in the stock, voila, straight pull action that rotates the case and draws it from the chamber easily. You even get the light weight of the barrel extension design, and can use an extruded bolt guide "upper" receiver to help attach the stock. With classic styling, some people would be hard pressed to see much difference.
Given some finesse, reversible ambidextrous action with right or left eject should be easy. With a bit of spring power, retract the bolt full to the rear and let go. It chambers without the additional push forward. Very fast.
A prototype could be homemade from existing parts in a very few days. How YOU react to the concept is exactly why it doesn't sell. Most would see it as a AR upper smashed down onto a stock and dismiss it, that gun is already out there. What it would look like if each part was purpose built to the design is what it can be.
You don't have to turn the bolt, try to sell one that doesn't.
Ask a bolt gun buyer if they would consider an AR in the same caliber, you get bruquesly dismissed. What where you thinking?
And yet, the Stoner bolt design would be great for a straight pull. Add a side charger handle to the bolt, like the ASA design, remove the gas, chop the bolt carrier to expose the firing pin, use a trigger group with hammer, 3-5 round mag well in the stock, voila, straight pull action that rotates the case and draws it from the chamber easily. You even get the light weight of the barrel extension design, and can use an extruded bolt guide "upper" receiver to help attach the stock. With classic styling, some people would be hard pressed to see much difference.
Given some finesse, reversible ambidextrous action with right or left eject should be easy. With a bit of spring power, retract the bolt full to the rear and let go. It chambers without the additional push forward. Very fast.
A prototype could be homemade from existing parts in a very few days. How YOU react to the concept is exactly why it doesn't sell. Most would see it as a AR upper smashed down onto a stock and dismiss it, that gun is already out there. What it would look like if each part was purpose built to the design is what it can be.
You don't have to turn the bolt, try to sell one that doesn't.
Last edited:
