Island Beretta
Member
Guys,
I have had it!! It appears of late that every subcompact is more accurate and shootable than its bigger brothers. The final straw was hearing that the XD subcompact ran rings around the service size XD. Previously I have heard that the Sig P239 was more accurate than the 228/229; the G26 outshoots the G19, some even say the G17; the 9000s is a crack shot compared to the 92 compact; the CS9 left the bigger S&Ws trailing in its wake; the PT111 was better than the PT915/910 blah, blah. I have fired most of these guns and for Pete's sake most of the time you can't even get a grip on the gun
I mean up to 7 yds. they MAYBE able to hang around a bit if you manage to draw it from concealment and get a good grip, but after that its downhill..literally
Doesn't sight radius, barrel length, grip size etc. affect performance anymore, in others words, apart from exceptions, BIGGER IS NO LONGER BETTER? yeah right...
I have had it!! It appears of late that every subcompact is more accurate and shootable than its bigger brothers. The final straw was hearing that the XD subcompact ran rings around the service size XD. Previously I have heard that the Sig P239 was more accurate than the 228/229; the G26 outshoots the G19, some even say the G17; the 9000s is a crack shot compared to the 92 compact; the CS9 left the bigger S&Ws trailing in its wake; the PT111 was better than the PT915/910 blah, blah. I have fired most of these guns and for Pete's sake most of the time you can't even get a grip on the gun
I mean up to 7 yds. they MAYBE able to hang around a bit if you manage to draw it from concealment and get a good grip, but after that its downhill..literally
Doesn't sight radius, barrel length, grip size etc. affect performance anymore, in others words, apart from exceptions, BIGGER IS NO LONGER BETTER? yeah right...