Suggest a Single Action

Status
Not open for further replies.
I owned a Ruger 50th anniversary BH in .357 - for about a week. Then I traded it off. That gun is bigger than the original and has a steel grip frame, adding up to a lot of extra weight. I'll stick to my old (unmodified) one, thanks.

Jim
 
Ruger BH Old Model 3 screw. Have 357-41- 44- 45. Had the SBH cut down to 4 5/8" like the others. True happiness.
 
What's the difference between the Blackhawk and the Vaquero? What I mean is, how do you choose one over the other? It seems odd that Ruger has two models that are so similar in general description.
 
What's the difference between the Blackhawk and the Vaquero? What I mean is, how do you choose one over the other? It seems odd that Ruger has two models that are so similar in general description.

Blackhawk = adjustable sights
Vaquero = fixed sights
 
And New Vaquero = smaller frame size, similar to the Colt SAA.

Depends on which size Blackhawk. My 50th Anniversary Blackhawk has the same size frame as the New Model Vaquero.
 
If you were after a .44 mag or hot-rod .45 Colt, I'd say go blackhawk. But for .357, my preference is the Uberti's. They simply look and feel better, and no owners manual on the gun.

YMMV.
 
The Ruger reigns supreme. If you want to go off the beaten path, take a look at some of the Berettas. I have a Stampede. It isn't as sturdy as my Blackhawks, but it shoots just as well and looks cool to boot.
 
I have been sorely tempted by the Beretta Stampede and especially the Cimarron Model P. Cabela's has one on their shelf and it is just beautiful. Both are made by Uberti. Then I go home and read some of the posts on the Cowboy Action Shooting websites about how the springs break in Ubertis, sometimes after 100 or 200 rounds. Usually a trigger spring. Many of those guys send their guns to their gunsmiths to replace all the springs before they even fire them. Now I am not bashing Ubertis....I think they are beautiful guns, but when I read this stuff, I'm just not willing to take a chance on one when my Rugers have been 100% reliable for the past 50 years. I guess I'll just stick to Rugers since they have been good to me.
 
I have the Beretta Stampede Marshall with the birdshead grips and 3 1/3 inch barrel. Very compact and sturdy. Amazingly accurate. Routinely out shoot my buddy with his Springfield 1911. Awsome gun and well worth the extra $. Ruger makes a heck of a nice gun but if you're going to go old school with SA you might as well go all the way with fixed sights. If I wanted adjustable sites on my revolver I would opt for a large frame double action, but that's just me and my nostalgia. The Vaq and new Vaq are very nice. Having compared them side by side with the Berettas I think the fit and finish of the Berettas are just a touch above Ruger but that's a fairly minor issue. The Beretta's transfer bar "safety" is well made and solid. I don't recall if the ruger has that feature. Rugers cylinder will rotate clockwise and counter-clockwise at half cock where as the Beretta will not. I personaly didn't care for that feature but others likely do. My two cents.
 
I got my Ruger Vaquero Montado (it's a New Vaquero, with a shorter barrel and a different hammer, if i'm not mistaken) a few weeks ago and I absolutely love it.

in short: +1 vote for the vaquero
 
I have 3 Uberti cattlemen, one in 357, and 4 Blackhawks, two in 357. Can't go wrong either way. You gotta pick each one up in your hand, work the action, feel 'em, point em, and then decide. Each has different handling characteristics; which one will you like better? Find out at a gun shop. If I could only own one . . . the Ruger.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top