Swedish M94

Status
Not open for further replies.

Shadow 7D

Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2008
Messages
7,002
Location
Frozen North
Just got back from my local gun dealer, and he had this cute little carbine just sitting in the rack, never seen one like it, got to talking to one of the other guys, until I could be helped, got a real nice history on the carbine.

I know that the M96 rifles are great, but how to the carbines stack up?
It is mostly intact, but is drilled and tapped, minus the rear sight and bayonet lug (so basic sporteriezed) and is only a shooter

is 250 too much?
 
Original Swede 94's (not sporterized) bring big bucks from collectors, but there are a bunch of counterfeit versions floating around made from M96 types.

Sporterized 94's are handy carbines and $250 is about right if the sporting job was done well.



NCsmitty
 
The 6.5x55mm cartridge was developed via a couple committees in both Norway and Sweden, starting in 1890. Norway was under the Swedish crown, at least in theory.
After much arguing back and forth, they decided on the 6.5mm and then started weapons trails from various vendors.
They tested Mauser model 91s, German 88 commission rifles, Mannlicher Rifles, British Enfields and others.

After the 1892 weapon trials, the three best choices were narrowed down to the Mauser, Krag-Jorgensen and Mannlicher.

From December 1892 through 1893 Paul Mauser continued to make modifications and improvements to his previous Mauser rifle designs in an attempt to nail down the contract.

Eventually the Swedes settled on the designs by Paul Mauser. The Norwegians decided to go with the Krag-Jorgensen Design. This came down to a difference in the senior Officer Corps way of thinking in both countries. The Norwegians, thought that they needed a rifle that was used as a single loader with the magazine rounds kept in emergency reserve.
The Swedes thought that the rifle should always be a magazine rifle and that the days of single loaded fire were over.

Back in Sweden, the Cavalry branch had been the last to get updated weapons during the last major upgrade within their armed forces. (they were still using Rolling Block Carbines) So they were allowed to take the first orders of the new 6.5mm weapons.
On August 7th, 1894 the final carbine variant was adopted by the Swedes as the model 1894 carbine.

The initial order of 12,000 1894 carbines was made in by Mauser company in Germany at the new addition to the Oberndorf Factory on the Neckar River.
The steel was Swedish supplied and Swedish inspection and acceptance officers were assigned duty at the German factory. The first 20 carbines were completed by Sept 1895. The entire first order of 12,000 carbines was finished in just six months.
In 1898, production was started at the Carl Gustaf State Rife Factory in Eskilstuna Sweden. They made an additional 113,000 carbines as well as the later m96 rifles. (Note that Mauser in Oberndorf also made the first runs of the m/96 rifles.)

The m/94 carbines and m/96 rifles had a rifling twist of 1 turn in 200mm. The original ammo was a 156grain (10.1gram) bullet going about 2,100 fps from the 17.5 inch carbine barrel.

The 9 gram (139 grain) spitzer boat-tail bullet design was accepted by the Swedes in 1941. It gave about 2,360 fps from the short carbine barrel.
 
As much as I like the M96, I'd take the shorter M94 over the M96 any day as I prefer the handier size. It's the same reason I gravitate more towards my M44s over my M91/30s.

As for the price, considering it's been butchered, I wouldn't go over $200... but that's just me and doesn't reflect the market value (which might justify the asking price). I don't mind owning a sporterized rifle, so as long as the price was "right".
 
I don't think this M94 ever had a bayonet lug. A lot of the early ones didn't. Perhaps made them slicker for cavalry use. I seem to recall they added the lug around 1914. If the barrel is good it is well worth $250. On the other hand, the AG-42B in the other pic seems a bit high, especially without the tough-to-find mag.
 
I picked up a sporterized M94 a couple of years back. Not drilled and tapped, but has a Williams peep sight. I like it. Handy little thing that shoots very well. Think I paid ~$225 for mine.
 
I don't think this M94 ever had a bayonet lug. A lot of the early ones didn't.
None of the m/94 carbines had bayonet lugs until the modification of 1914. Even then many (now only a few on the market) are found that have avoided the modification.
The butchered carbine in question was made in 1918 and it seems to have the bottom metal which extends back from the bayonet style nose cap. It looks like bubba just ground off the bayonet lugs.

It also has the welded-on barrel extension that was required for a few years for import into the US.

Tell em that you will give them $200 and then put it into an aftermarket synthetic stock. I will buy the Redfield Peep from you if you mount a scope on it. I have an old Mauser safari rifle that it would fit on...
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top