Ed Ames
Member
I have a problem and I need some sense talked into me, or at least some perspective.
One of my favorite plinking guns is a .45c single action revolver. I only have one but it's lots of fun. I load for it and with lead bullets it's fairly cheap too. Mine is not a Ruger/safe for overpressure loads.
I've recently been wanting to take the power up a notch. The first thought was a stronger .45c, but then there is the concern about an overpower load getting in the weak gun. .454 casull answers that. Oh, and I want a double action just because.
Standard super redhawks are so monumentally ugly I won't own one. The Ruger Alaskan is fine but the 2.5" barrel goes a long way towards undoing the increased power capability of the .454.
Taurus has a few reasonable looking models... we all know the potential downsides too. I haven't handled one.
S&W seems to jump straight to the .460. At 68 ounces (5" barrel) it's pushing what I'd call reasonable. The 2.75" model drops the weight to 54oz but seems like a sacrifice (after compensator you are still losing 1.25" of barrel length. S&W has a better trigger than the ruger.
I'm in danger of ending up with a very silly .460 when all I really want is a .45 with more oomph unless someone can talk some sense into me. Are there other options I should be considering?
One of my favorite plinking guns is a .45c single action revolver. I only have one but it's lots of fun. I load for it and with lead bullets it's fairly cheap too. Mine is not a Ruger/safe for overpressure loads.
I've recently been wanting to take the power up a notch. The first thought was a stronger .45c, but then there is the concern about an overpower load getting in the weak gun. .454 casull answers that. Oh, and I want a double action just because.
Standard super redhawks are so monumentally ugly I won't own one. The Ruger Alaskan is fine but the 2.5" barrel goes a long way towards undoing the increased power capability of the .454.
Taurus has a few reasonable looking models... we all know the potential downsides too. I haven't handled one.
S&W seems to jump straight to the .460. At 68 ounces (5" barrel) it's pushing what I'd call reasonable. The 2.75" model drops the weight to 54oz but seems like a sacrifice (after compensator you are still losing 1.25" of barrel length. S&W has a better trigger than the ruger.
I'm in danger of ending up with a very silly .460 when all I really want is a .45 with more oomph unless someone can talk some sense into me. Are there other options I should be considering?