Taser Nation ???

Status
Not open for further replies.

SSN Vet

Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2006
Messages
6,505
Location
The Dark Side of the Moon
Clipped this from the local rag, Foster's Daily Democrat.

Sounds like tasers are all the rage in sub-lethal force.

Note the interesting stats about perps. getting shot after being tased didn't stop them.

----------------

PORTSMOUTH, NH — Members of the Police Department will soon be carrying electro muscular disruption weapons, better known as "Tasers," which Chief Michael Magnant hopes will provide officers with an alternative to using lethal force in potentially deadly situations.

The Police Commission unanimously approved the purchase of Tasers following a PowerPoint presentation about the devices Wednesday afternoon.

"I feel that the time has come where we need to deploy the Taser out on the street," Magnant told the commission.

The Tasers fire a pair of probes up to 35 feet, transmitting energy pulses that override the central nervous system and cause immediate incapacitation. According to Hillsdale Police Lt. Todd Faulkner, who has personally been "tased" more than 26 times, the devices do not cause lasting injuries.

Donna Brazell, general manager of Triple Nickel Tactical Supply, said 64 law enforcement agencies in New Hampshire are currently equipped with Taser technology — more than any other state in New England.

Though Magnant was skeptical of Tasers when they first emerged, he said he has monitored the equipment's progress and become convinced of its effectiveness. Sgt. Steve DuBois has been researching the technology and reporting back to the chief.

Magnant said he is concerned about a large population of people in the city who suffer from mental illnesses and addiction issues. Such individuals have occasionally created dangerous situations, he said, forcing officers to consider firing their handguns.

Incidents involving the use of firearms can be devastating for both the community and police, Magnant said. His goal is to provide officers with "an option other than deadly force."

Referencing an incident last year during which State Police used a Taser on a mentally ill man who had threatened officers with a pair of nunchucks, Portsmouth Deputy Chief Len DiSesa called the measure a "much better alternative to a bullet."

Taser technology was first developed by NASA in 1974, Faulkner said. Numerous modifications have been made over the years, and Taser International created the X26 model in 2003. The device, which delivers 50,000 volts, is designed to cause muscle contractions and disorientation.

Though the probes are barbed and can be painful, Faulkner said Tasers do not rely on pain to subdue suspects. Testing has been conducted on more than 200,000 volunteers, he said, 99 percent of whom were instantly incapacitated. Some of the volunteers experienced pain, skin irritation, temporary blisters, redness and minor bleeding, he added, but none suffered permanent damage to nervous tissue.

According to the Taser International website, 9,833 Taser incidents were reported in the first quarter of 2006. Of those incidents, 622 resulted in minor injuries such as puncture wounds and abrasions, and 29 resulted in moderate injuries such as cuts from falls and shots to the genitals or testicle.

Six of the incidents resulted in severe injuries, including a probe to the eye, a fractured skull from a fall, a cardiac arrest, and a death involving drugs. Two people suffered gunshot wounds after the probes failed to entirely incapacitate them.

Faulkner said many law enforcement agencies have dramatically reduced officer-involved shootings and suspect injuries since becoming equipped with Tasers. State Police Sgt. Gary Wood said troopers deployed the weapons 24 times in 2005 and did not encounter any problems.

"It's been a very effective tool," Wood said.

The Phoenix Police Department, one of the first to provide patrol officers with Tasers, nearly cut in half the number of officer-involved shootings in the city between 2002 and 2003, the Taser International website states.

Asked by Commissioner Gerald Howe whether any Taser incidents have occurred in New Hampshire with negative results, Faulkner said there have been no official problems. Misinformation from the media and the Internet have led some defense attorneys to challenge the use of Tasers, he added.

Brazell, who has twice been shot with a Taser, said the company has its own medical board, which conducts studies to ensure the safety of the devices. She stressed Tasers are not intended to cause lasting injuries.

"It simply locks up your muscles," she said.

A product warning on the company's website states muscle contractions caused by Tasers "can result in strain-type injuries such as hernias, ruptures, or other injuries to soft tissue, organs, muscles, tendons, ligaments, nerves, joints, and stress/compression fractures to bones, including vertebrae."

Magnant said the department would adopt strict training procedures before equipping officers with Tasers or similar devices. He said policies would be developed to establish when the use of such weapons is justifiable.

Still, he does not expect the transition to be without its challenges.

"The likelihood is that we are going to be sued," he said.

But Tasers should ultimately reduce liability issues by mitigating the reliance on firearms, he added. Faulkner noted X26 Tasers offer full accountability by keeping track of deployments with internal records that can be downloaded on computers.

Magnant estimated the cost of supplying the department with Tasers at about $10,000, plus an additional $5,000 for training. Now that the commission has approved the purchase, he expects to acquire Tasers or similar devices within the next 30 to 60 days.

All three commissioners voted in favor of the purchase, though Howe reserved the right to reopen the issue if further concerns should arise.

"This is probably one of the most serious public policy decisions I have faced on this commission," he said.
 
I'm sure they are great in certain situations but it seems like they are being overused in this part of the country. Practically every news story involves the person being tased, even if they weren't acting violent. Just because they are less lethal shouldn't make tasing people S.O.P.
Don't get me wrong, they have probably saved many officers lives but it seems almost routine now to hear "when the man didn't follow the instructions he was tased and handcuffed" in non-violent situations.
 
I think the problem is that they're using them as compliance tools, rather than a substitute for lethal force.
 
Ouch!

29 resulted in moderate injuries such as cuts from falls and shots to the genitals or testicle.

An electric jolt to the jewels with barbed needles, oooowwww!!!

The taser is effective in some situations. It does work very well on individual intoxicated or disturbed suspects.

http://www.personal-selfdefense-online.com/taser-video_center.htm


The main problem I see with the taser is that it is a one shot deal, if you are facing multiple threats you will need to use a pistol. There isn’t a 10 shot taser. Granted you can reload a taser to shoot someone else, but then you will not be able to continue sending jolts to the first person you shot. This was true of the civilian models; I am not sure about the LEO models.

I agree with the previous post that the taser may be used more liberally as a compliance tool, like pepper spray is used. It is hard to draw the line as to what is “resisting” arrest. I have heard of people cursing and insulting (in a non-threatening way) and get sprayed. Non-violent protesters will sometimes get sprayed for non-compliance. Will the taser be used that way as well? Time will tell.

http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/content/news/video/taser_video3a.html

Justified? You decide. The video starts at the beginning of the traffic stop, so the viewer does not know if it was a routine stop or if she was fleeing or endangering others and herself. IMHO it is hard to tell if it was justified with out seeing her initial violation, if there was one. It does seem excessive for a traffic violation, but not excessive if she was involved in a hit and run of a pedestrian.
 
I think the problem is that they're using them as compliance tools, rather than a substitute for lethal force.

Seems to me that is just the point! Lethal force is not an option if all you are seeking is compliance. Tasers are part of the compliance arc of the continuum of force. They were never designed to be defensive or lethal options.

Person is given a verbal command to do some action - be it to prone out or stop running their mouth. Person is informed that the LEO claims legal authority to compel the action, and that the person is in jeopardy of a consequence (here, being tased) if they fail to comply with the command.

Person refuses to comply with the command. LEO applies the consequence in order to attain compliance.

While I may have some thoughts on the use of compliance techniques on a person who is "merely" running their mouth, it seems to me that if the LEO has warned (threatened?) that a consequence will ensue if you do not comply with the lawful command, the responsibility for receiving the consequence is yours.

The question of the lawfulness of the command can be addressed later, through internal complaint and/or the legal system.

Most of us ought to know that in the street, in the heat of the moment, is not the most appropriate place and time to debate the lawfulness of a LEO's commands and behavior.

If there is a reason why you cannot instantaneously comply with the LEO's command, it is your responsibility to communicate that reason. I'm very much like that perky older lady in the "stay in school" PSA - the one who comes out with the cheerleaders and tries to do a split, with all the groans and creaking joints. I'm going to be yelling something to the effect that I am physically disabled but attempting to comply as best I can. I am not going to try to get back in my vehicle, or twist away, or push away the LEO's arms, or any of the other stuff you see on the reality video shows just before the compliance techniques are brought to bear.

If your complaint is that LEO's are selecting tasers instead of lesser compliance methods, then we have a different discussion - one regarding use of force policy and training.

stay safe.

skidmark
 
This is the Strategies and Tactics Forum

Discussion will be limited to the tactics, techniques and procedures for deploying the taser. If you want to discuss if it should a comliance tool or even used at all I'll move the thread to Legal and Political.

Jeff
 
The main problem I see with the taser is that it is a one shot deal, if you are facing multiple threats you will need to use a pistol. There isn’t a 10 shot taser. Granted you can reload a taser to shoot someone else, but then you will not be able to continue sending jolts to the first person you shot. This was true of the civilian models; I am not sure about the LEO models.

You are correct in that Tasers are one-shot affairs. However, my department's policy for employment is that when possible, an officer with a lethal force option will be present when the Taser is used as an alternative to lethal force. We had an officer involved shooting recently where an Arkansas State Trooper shot a subject with a shotgun. The young man was misidentified as a known armed fugitive (the real guy was shot and caught later that same day not very far away) but refused to comply with officers' repeated orders to keep his hands in sight. The subject made a move toward his waistband and the trooper shot. The guy died on the way to the hospital.

If a Taser had been present, it would have given the officers another option. I can't second guess anyone because I wasn't there, but if one innocent death could have been avoided safely, it would have been a very good thing. The trooper was indicted by a grand jury on a charge of misdemeanor homicide (still can't figure that one out) and is now very likely at the abrupt end of his career.

Our bottom line is that when a Taser is employed, back up with deadly force should be immediately available. It won't always happen that way, but that's the SOP.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top