Taurus 738 TCP Range report and MANY pictures!

[Full Metal Jacket]

AND you have to understand that you shouldn't be spouting off how this entire gun line is junk because you heard something from a guy somewhere. Its not even your "Personal experience".

but you shouldn't be throwing stones.

JOe

another one that can't handle other's opinions and experiences....whatever you say, joe.

 

[Kingofthehill]

another one that can't handle other's opinions and experiences....whatever you say, joe.

I can handle it just fine. With facts.

Im just not going to shut out an entire line of guns because some guy on a the internet said some other guy told him of what he heard somewhere.

Every gun has problem's. Nothing is perfect.

Careful getting a Glock in .40 caliber and putting a light on the rail, they blow up!...

see what i mean?

 

[Full Metal Jacket]

^^^ i simply passed along info i heard from buddies of mine that own a local high volume gun shop. no more, and no less. you're blowing it way out of proportion jumping to you're own conclusions, not my conclusions, my friend.

 

[Kingofthehill]

^^^ i simply passed along info i heard from buddies of mine that own a local high volume gun shop. no more, and no less. you're blowing it way out of proportion jumping to you're own conclusions, not my conclusions, my friend.

Im not blowing it out of proportion, in fact im trying to stop that from happening.

I am not jumping to any conclusion yet, im doing the opposite and reserving the right to judge the gun based on proof. You have come to the conclusion, not me. You have turned your back on the pistol and are trying to spread the word without facts.

I just hope people judge the gun from personal experiences and not from just reading it online on a forum from a guy going by what he was told and had not seen.

JOe

 

[cskny]

Full metal jacket, i think you should just stop posting in this thread.

You're "contribution" is recorded and you're not adding any value

 

[Full Metal Jacket]

^^^good thing i care not about what you think.


ok, i tried being nice about your ridiculous attacks:

some folks (who shall remain nameless) act like whiny babies that can't handle anyone's opposing opinion about a gun they own. 'nough said.


for the vast majority of folks on here that appreciates any input about a possible purchase, hope my input helps your decision.

(by the way, you can say whatever you like about a gun i own-think i'm gonna cry in my beer about it?)

 

[Macchina]

^^^good thing i care not about what you think.


ok, i tried being nice about your ridiculous attacks:

some folks (who shall remain nameless) act like whiny babies that can't handle anyone's opposing opinion about a gun they own. 'nough said.


for the vast majority of folks on here that appreciates any input about a possible purchase, hope my input helps your decision.

(by the way, you can say whatever you like about a gun i own-think i'm gonna cry in my beer about it?)

Wow, you still don't get the point that this is a review thread, and since you don't own the gun and have never shot the gun you are not helping the integrity of this review. The whole point of the post that you are taking as attacks on yourself is to keep the conversation here to first person experience. We are not offended that something negative was posted about the Taurus TCP, we are offended that something negative was posted that we (nor yourself except for shear trust) can substantiate. The point is that on the internet there is enough lying because there is not accountability. When you start quoting unknown and unofficial people you meet in your everyday life, the possibly of incorrect facts becomes too great.

Here is your chain of communication:
>Unknown amounts of customers on unknown dates with unknown intentions or experiences purchased an unknown amount of Taurus TCP's. These customers do unknown things with their TCP's and an unknown amount of the total customers return TCP's for unknown reasons.
>A gun cleark with unknown (to us and I hate to say it, but probably also to you) intentions tells you that this unknown amount of Taurus TCP's were returned.
>You (another unknown) then post online the end of this chain of communication for unknown reasons.

We are not upset that you posted something negative about the TCP, we are upset you posted something negative about the TCP with such a weak foundation.
Please forgive me for not wanting to have that input be a part of my review.

Please post only about your own personal first hand experience with the gun in the review.

 

[Full Metal Jacket]

ok.




EDIT:

sure thing

 

[Monster Zero]

Thanks for the report.

Question that I don't really expect anyone to have the answer to:

Does Taurus (or Ruger, or anyone else for that matter) plan to make something like this in .32 acp? I have no quarrel with those who own .380's but it's just not for me. In a pocket auto, I think I like the .32 better like the P32, which is actually on my list - but, I can't help but wonder if someone else is gonna make one the way they're coming out with all these .380's. Or are they all just gonna leave that market to Kel-tec?

 

[wild cat mccane]

.32 TCP is coming from taurus.

 

[armoredman]

I would love to shoot a TCP, handled it along with the LCP, the Kahr, the Micro Eagle, the KelTec P3AT, and one more I can't remember. Honestly, and I am not a huge Taurus fan, I want one. If it will work with good ammo, SD JHP with some stones, I want one.