Taurus 990ss4 question

Status
Not open for further replies.

high country

Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2007
Messages
481
Location
St. Louis, MO
Does anyone have any experience with the Taurus 990ss4 or ss6 in .22lr? I know that Taurus is generally disliked on these boards, and that people have had problems with the Model 94.

But I am in the market for a .22 DA revolver as a practice companion for my Ruger GP100 (note to Ruger, if you made such a thing, like say an SP101 in .22, you would sell them by the boatloads). The Taurus seems like a good deal, and is a nice enough looking gun, but I am interested in seeing what sort of experiences folks have had with them.

Thanks for sharing!
 
The people who have a disliking normally are those who never had one or didn't follow the checklist for buying a handgun.

That or unbelieveable anecdotes are the normal theme.

One guy claims to have a 94 that was full of shavings and other stuff.

That means the gun would not functon even one little bit yet he goes on with the tail at another thread. It is also an older bash technique that holds no merit.

I own a 94, but not the 990.

So only the actual owners' use counts. No others do.

As for the 990 owners here's the score from them.

http://www.taurusarmed.net/forums/index.php?topic=41711.0
http://www.taurusarmed.net/forums/index.php?topic=40342.0
http://www.taurusarmed.net/forums/index.php?topic=29896.0
http://www.taurusarmed.net/forums/index.php?topic=26433.0
http://www.taurusarmed.net/forums/index.php?topic=21373.0
http://www.taurusarmed.net/forums/index.php?topic=33462.0
http://www.taurusarmed.net/forums/index.php?topic=27281.0
http://www.taurusarmed.net/forums/index.php?topic=31332.0
http://www.taurusarmed.net/forums/index.php?topic=22127.0

Some of these link are more about data then owner usage.

4 more typed regular size paper pages of links can be brought forth on the actual satisfied owners of 990s.

These are cousins to the Taurus 970.
 
I have the 970 7-shot. Very accurate and dependable. I recently purchased a 44 tracker on the same frame, you don't wanna get me going on that gun.:(

The 22 tracker has been a great gun now for about 8 years now. The only problem I had is a 22 bullet got stuck in the barrel (not the guns fault) cheap walmart bulk ammo. My kid was shooting next to me and I heard what sounded like a fizzle shot and I yelled, "don't fire another shot!!". He stopped immediately and I checked the barrel and their was a bullet stuck about halfway down. When I got home I just poked a cleaning rod down the barrel and it popped right out (I had one more like it in that 500 brick).

The gun is a blast at 50 yrds I can hit a pop can 8 out of 10 times. Here is a pic of my 970.

One more thing, get rid of the cheesy "ribber" grip and get a Hogue grip, you will like it a lot better ($20 on amazon).;)
 

Attachments

  • 22tracker.JPG
    22tracker.JPG
    120.4 KB · Views: 9
I too have the 970SS6. I bought it new last summer . No complaints here except the DA trigger pull. Could be a little lighter in my book. I have put about 500 rounds through it so far with no problems. My wife can pick off empty shotgun shells from 10 yards with it.
 
All great comments, thanks! Got a chance to handle on this afternoon at a local shop that had one in stock. Felt good, other than those grips... really, it feels like you are holding a cheap cooking utensil. I have decided to try to negotiate a trade, so I will have to look through and decide what I am going to send on to its next owner to make room for this :)
 
Aquisition Made

Well, I managed to work out a trade for a 990ss4 :cool: I am very stoked about the new addition to the family.

So, I took it out to shoot a little this afternoon. First the good: The DA trigger is a little heavy for my tastes but not terribly so, and it is smooth, with a predictable release. That last part I did not expect. I will probably try a lighter return spring, but all in all I am quite happy with the trigger. Second good thing is that after a quick rough sight adjustment, I found that this thing is very accurate. My first impression is that I was as accurate with this thing as I am with my buckmark that has a red-dot, although some paper targets and more shooting will be necessary to confirm. At any rate, very impressed with the accuracy.

But then the bad: I checked the gun out in the shop, but it appears that I missed a couple of things. First, the cylinder gap is too tight. After about three cylinders, the cylinder started to bind, making it impossible to pull the trigger in DA, or cock the hammer manually. But while putting rearward pressure on the hammer, if I gave the cylinder a little nudge with a finger, it would free up and allow the hammer to cock. I wiped off the back of the forcing cone and front of the cylinder with some CLP, and problem solved for another three cylinders. I can see light through the gap, but I did not have a feeler gauge with me at the shop so I didn't get to really check the gap. I will check it with a feeler tomorrow. On visual inspection, I could see where there were signs of rubbing in the fouling on the rear of the forcing cone, so I am confident that that is the problem.

Also, while the lockup seemed good in the shop, once I fired several rounds (I made it through 6 cylinders, with a cleanup in the middle to remedy the above issue.) I noticed an odd trait. The lockup is tight enough, and timing is good, when the hammer is cocked. When you pull the trigger back slightly to release the trigger, letting the hammer down gently, the lockup remains tight. However, if you then pull the trigger back further slowly, there is a point between the hammer release point, and the furthest back that the trigger will go that the lockup loosens. The timing is on if you check it with a light, but the cylinder can rotate a bit more (more than I would like). My guess is that this isn't really a big deal because by time the trigger gets back that far, the hammer has fallen and the bullet has passed the cylinder gap. The accuracy bears that theory out, so I am tempted to ignore that issue, but it still bugs me a little because it isn't quite right. It does spit a little lead out, that you can see on the inside of the top of the frame, but I am guessing that is pretty typical of .22lr revolvers.

So, I am trying to decide whether to give Taurus a call to send it to them to iron out... or just give to a local smith to adjust the gap, and ignore the lockup issue. Too bad, but all in all I am really happy with the design, accuracy, and feel of the gun, so if they can make it right I will continue to be happy.:rolleyes:

Sorry for the long winded writeup, but I thought it would be worth sharing the specifics for anyone out there that is considering one of these guns. Any thoughts or experiences that you all might have with these two issues would be greatly appreciated:)
 
(note to Ruger, if you made such a thing, like say an SP101 in .22, you would sell them by the boatloads).

Ruger made an SP in .22LR for some number of years, including a 4-incher. Maybe keep an eye out on gunbroker?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top