Taurus 9mm revolvers - reviews? They even still MAKE them?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Green Latern. There are Taurus 605s,85s,and other snubbies that are .38 Special or .357 magnum. This is all the power you will need for self defense.

Behold for example, Buffalo Bore Ammo which is designed for use in snubbies at eithrer +P or standard pressure loads. They are know the level of performance that other ammo has to comapre itself against.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Standard Pressure Short Barrel Heavy .38 Special Printed Order Form




Standard Pressure Short Barrel
Heavy .38 Special

Item No. 20C/20 158gr. very soft lead cast, SWC-HC gas checked bullet — 854 fps (256 ft. lbs.) from S&W mod. 60, 2 inch barrel Per Box of 20
$20.99
Order Now
Item No. 20D/20 Very hard cast 150gr. WAD CUTTER bullet — 868 fps (251 ft. lbs.)from S&W mod. 60, 2 inch barrel Per Box of 20
$20.99
Order Now
Item No. 20E/20 Speer Low Velocity uni-core 125 gr. Jacketed hollow cavity — 921 fps (235 ft. lbs.) from S&W mod. 60, 2 inch barrel Per Box of 20
$20.99
Order Now

Standard Pressure, Short Barrel, Lower Recoil, Heavy 38 SPL

Due to customer demand, we’ve developed this defensive 38SPL ammo. Our customers wanted some devastating 38SPL loads that would fill the following criteria.

It won’t hurt older/fragile/alloy revolvers. (Non +P)
Is effective as a “fight stopper” through the use of proper bullets.
Is more powerful than typical/standard, weak 38SPL ammo.
Generate much less recoil than our +P 38SPL ammo.
Is flash suppressed.
Buffalo Bore is introducing these three different heavy, yet standard pressure loadings for 38 SPL. These offerings are loaded at standard pressure, but they are much more powerful than normal 38SPL ammo. These loads will not harm older more fragile revolvers. So, these loads are safe for use in ANY 38 SPL revolver, provided it is in normal working condition. As stated above, the “POWER” level of these loads is really closer to a typical +P power level, but the pressure is standard. We are able to develop these powerful standard pressure loads with modern non-canister powders. Again, these loads recoil far less than our +P 38 SPL ammo.

All three of these loads are flash suppressed, so firing them in the dark wont blind you. We use flash suppressed powder in our defensive ammo, in the loadings we can, because over 90% of all civilian shootings in America, occur in low light, when the criminal element is at work. We don’t want you blinded by your own gunfire after the first shot.

Item 20C utilizes the same 158gr. very soft lead cast, SWC-HC gas checked bullet, we load in our +P 38 SPL ammo. It is designed to expand and then penetrate quite deep. (Approx. 14 inches in human tissue) This bullet is gas checked and will NOT lead your barrel. Note the below velocities that I recorded out of my personal revolvers—NOT TEST BARRELS!

S&W mod. 60, 2 inch barrel—854 fps (256 ft. lbs.)
S&W mod. 66, 2.5 inch barrel—871 fps (266 ft. lbs.)
Ruger SP101, 3 inch barrel—930 fps (303 ft. lbs.)
S&W Mt. Gun, 4 inch barrel—979 fps (336 ft. lbs.)
Item 20D utilizes a very hard cast 150gr. WAD CUTTER bullet. The bullet is made hard, so it won’t deform or mushroom. It cuts/crushes a “cookie cutter”, full diameter hole in human flesh just like it does on a paper target. It penetrates deeply (roughly 14 to 16 inches in human tissue) and its full diameter profile maximizes blood loss as it cuts and crushes (not slips or slides) its way through tissue. Although I’ve never been shot with a full profile wad cutter bullet, I must assume that the initial impact of that wide flat nosed bullet, is crushingly formidable. As a teenager, I took to the woods on a regular basis and killed many a critter with heavily loaded 38SPL wad cutters’. The effect of a full profile wad cutter on small game was obvious and amazing, compared to regular round nosed bullets. That flat nose, literally hammers living things. These bullets are hard and properly lubed and will NOT lead your barrel. Note my velocities from real world “over the counter” revolvers—NOT TEST BARRELS!

a. S&W mod. 60, 2 inch barrel—868 fps (251 ft. lbs.)
b. S&W mod. 66, 2.5 inch barrel—890 fps (264 ft. lbs.)
c. Ruger SP101, 3 inch barrel—961 fps (308 ft. lbs.)
d. S&W Mt. Gun, 4 inch barrel—1005 fps (336 ft. lbs.)

Item 20E utilizes a Speer Low Velocity uni-core (Gold Dot) 125 gr. Jacketed hollow nose bullet. This bullet is designed to expand at low speeds and has no problem opening up at considerably less velocity than our advertised 900 fps, from two inch barrels. Penetration in human tissue is roughly 12 inches. Note my test velocities below from real world, “over the counter” revolvers—NOT TEST BARRELS!

S&W mod. 60, 2 inch barrel—921 fps (235 ft. lbs.)
S&W mod. 66, 2.5 inch barrel—938 fps (244 ft. lbs.)
Ruger SP101, 3 inch barrel—1019 fps (288 ft. lbs.)
S&W Mt. Gun, 4 inch barrel—1078 fps (322 ft. lbs.)

This is just the standard pressure loads. The +Ps are are even more impressive.
Speer makes it's +P 135 JHP Gold Dot that is a excellent pick.

.357 magnum power is mostly wasted in snubbies. All that extra recoil,noise, and muzzle flazh do not make for a large increase in power or much larger muzzle velocity gain over .38 Specials.

Shot to shot recovery times are longer along with what could be disorienting noise and flash during a life and death struggle when fractions of or seconds count. Especially inside a dwelling.

As for the 9mm. revolver under most circumstances a 9mm. round out of a snubbie beats a .38 Special in almost all departments. There are exceptions.

But behold some things to consider.
Cylinder stop retracted on new Taurus
« Reply #7 on: Today at 08:48:30 AM » Quote Modify Remove

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
905s are 9mm. and the moonclips take some effort to strip old ones out and new ones in prior to loading into the revolver. However once the clips have fresh cartridges in place on the clip there is no faster way to reload or unload a revolver.

Same goes for th S&W 625 and it's brethren.

The idea is to have the clips preloaded and ready to go when doing a range session or using the gun for CCW carry. These clips slip into or out of the chambers quicker than speedloaders can be used.

Clip with cartridges goes in together and comes out altogether.This with a flick of the ejector while the revolver is tipped upward and back.

Gravity will assist the unloading or loading.

Spent brass can be unloaded from the clips later at ones discretion.Then new ammo can be placed back on readying the clips if need be.

As for the clips, getting these from Taurus is not that hard. Just order them from them.

One other reason for the moonclips. Pistol cartridges need to be headspaced correctly for proper relaible function and accuracy.
Moonclips see to this.

These also help the ejector work efficently. Guns can be fired without the clips, but accuracy,misfires,and hangups of spent brass can and do happen. In a life threatening emergency this could prove fatal to one or all involved. At the range it doesn't matter.

Reloading may be needed in a real world confrontation.Lately there have been documented cases where off duty officers and civilains(male and female) wound up in defense scenarios with snubbies and had one round left. The criminals decided to leave the scene without pressing the matter to conclusion.

Just things to consider. People will choose what to do and live or die by it. Subjective and objective criteria folks.

« Last Edit: Today at 08:59:29 AM by Qwiks draw » Report to moderator 64.24.186.48

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NRA member- Join a pro-gun group. Stand up and be counted.
www.corneredcat.com

Nothing totally wrong with either a .357 magnum snubbie, 9mm.905 revolver, or a 5,6,or 7 shot snubbie in .38 Special. Lots of pro and cons to consider on a case by case basis. Realistic personal limitations need to be considered too.

Have both a Taurus model 65- 2.5 in. barreled .357 magnum revolver and a 85CH in .38 Special. Realistic limitations and assesments mean .38 Specials in +P or standard pressure ammo get the nod. This is just as an example and choice.

Attackers are not going to impresed or notice with what they are hit with. Shot placement and proper JHP or LSWCHP bullets will take care of that aspect.
 
Assuming that I put aside buying a 12 Gauge to get a snubby. My handguns are .380s and a 9mm. Ammo-wise, the 9mm would be more practical. But, I wouldn't mind something a bit more powerful like a .357. Then again, to get the most out of a "hand cannon" it would ideally have a longer barrel, no?

I don't like .357mag out of a snubbie. Not everyone agrees, but many do. The recoil is far from pleasant, the heavy felt recoil means much slower follow-up shots, and the revolvers made for .357mag are a tad heavier than those made for .38spl (a consideration when you consider the role these guns are made for). Also, .357mag was originally developed for long barrelled revolvers, and magnum cartridges lose a lot out of a shorter barrel (it is still far more powerful than .38spl, but you won't have the same degree of difference you would have in a 4" or 6" revolver). I found with the Taurus 605 I used to have that I shot .38spl almost exclusively out of it, and I planned on .38+P for "social situations." Well, it is a couple oz. heavier than the .38spl Taurus 85 so I sold it, and a year or two later I bought my Taurus 85CH (which I will never part with).

I do think that .38+P in proper loadings is a potent enough caliber (like the Buffalo Bore suggested by weregunner or the Speer Gold Dots, especially the 135gr loading developed specifically for short barrelled snubs). However, if you aren't fully comfortable with it that is where the 9mm snubs really find their niche. They will be more powerful than .38spl, they lose less out of a short barrel than .357mag so the power out of a 2" snub will be fairly close (the .357mag is still more powerful) and recoil will probably about split the difference between .38+P and .357mag.

That all said, with the additional info you included above (thinking about a 12ga, have a .380 and a 9mm) may I make a suggestion? It isn't what you are asking, but you may want to consider waiting on the snub and getting the 12ga. A shotgun is one of the best guns for home defense work, much better than any handgun. You already have a .380 so you have at least one gun of a suitable size and caliber (barely) for CCW. You don't say what your 9mm is, but it too may already be suitable for CCW. If it was me, I'd get the shotgun for HD now, and get another CCW later.
 
It isn't what you are asking, but you may want to consider waiting on the snub and getting the 12ga. A shotgun is one of the best guns for home defense work, much better than any handgun.

I am torn on my next gun purchase, and I figure that a pump, 8-shot, 12 gauge needs to be at the top of the list or right below. I do have a .410, but realize that is nowhere NEAR in the league of the 12.

Though, I just saw the new SAF Personal Firearm Defense DVD - the host talked about (and demonstrated) how common rounds penetrate walls in homes. The BEST choice was - #9 Birdshot. Even in 12 gauge, it penetrated walls less than even a 9mm Glaser or a .223 TAP round.

Hmm. Well, my main HD gun is the same as my main CCW - a Glock 19.

My only experience with a snub was an aunt's S&W DAO .38. Recoil wasn't bad, though maybe not something I would want to shoot all day long. If I did go the .357 route, I'd planned on just using .38 or .38+P if it was too much - but I didn't consider the WEIGHT difference.

I've owned a Kel-Tec P3AT for a while, and I guess that gun can really "spoil" you for the ultimate in comfortable pocket carry! ;) My Bersa Thunder .380, on the other hand - no good as a pocket gun, especially in the bluejeans that I favor. More stuff to think about...

BTW, does anyone know if either of the Taurus 9mm revolvers are hammerless (like the CIA)? For a pocket gun, that would be a big plus, I think.
 
905 thoughts

Well, I just got a taurus 905 from my girlfriend, and I love it. We love revolvers, and have many of them; from s$w, taurus, ruger, and colt. I would also like to say we shoot light-for-caliber bullets in our snubbies: for the 905 I load sierra 90 gr. jhp's. The cylinder is far shorter than the other 9mm snubs we've seen. I haven't had a single problem with the moon clips, and I've shot hundreds of rounds of many different types of ammo. Many, but not all, holsters made for the S&W J-frame will work just fine. Now, about Taurus revolvers: THEY'RE GREAT! If you can find a 905 for a decent price....BUY IT! Smithy and Ruger 9mm revolvers are going for top dollar. The 905 is not as strong as the Ruger, and nuthin' is as smooth as a Smith and Wesson, but all Taurus revolvers we've purchased have been exceptionally fine values- the 905 is no exception. One final note: some HI-TEST factory ammo doesn't fully chamber in my 905. Thats the only blemish on an otherwise perfect relationship.
 
Ok...I think the "plan" may be as follows:

1st and 2nd - 12 ga pump, and Taurus 905 (unsure of order)

3rd, "eventually" - a longer-barreled .357! :D
 
Picture of my 905C

Here is the picture I promised. I wish I knew how to take pictures like some of the guys on this board.

Taurus905C.jpg
 
I just purchased a NIB Taurus 905 (9mm) a couple of weeks ago. Had a minor problem with the cylinder stop initially but received good advice from the Taurus forum on how to resolve.

I really like this little snubbie and have fired over 225rds without the "moon-clips" with no problems whatsoever. Taurus calls them "Stellar-Clips". It's a great pocket-rocket but I CC it in a Blackhawk leather holster.

Even though I have small hands, the bite with 124gr Hydrashocks is not bad at all. Great backup weapon to my G19 and as soon as I put another 300rds through it, it will become my primary weapon on some days.

DA trigger pull is very smooth and accuracy is better than I can shoot.

Get one if you can!!! :D

g19erusa
 
I've had my Taurus 905 for a while and as said, it will work fine without stellar (moon) clips. I have no idea why I bought it but for being an odd ball (wheel gun in 9mm) addition to my collection. A nice thing, it does fit most of my S&W 642 holsters.

271252830.gif 271252828.gif

- Terry
 
"TK Custom Moonclips" makes full clips for the five shot 9mm SP 101 which will probably fit other five round revos like the Taurus - they are GREAT clips...shells attached / detached from outter perimeter, not inner. Twelve pack is about $20 and worth every penny...TW<<
 
I owned a 905ss for a short while and always
had problem with sticky extraction even
with standard pressure loads.It did have a
nice trigger and was accurate enough but i
got tired of having to slap the ejector hard
enough to leave marks on my hand.
 
I purchased a brand new Taurus 905SS just recently, it's got the hammer and is satin stainless. It shoots 9MM just fine and I have yet to use the moonclips for it.
I haven't used it for a carry piece yet, but it will be the main carry gun I have shortly. The trigger is nice and smooth in DA mode and it also has a crisp SA trigger as well.

If you can find one, I'd recommend getting one. Most distributors don't have them, but gunstores still do as I bought mine in July this year.
 
I got a 905 about 6 months ago, shot a few hundred rds through it and traded it away. I loved the snub, and wanted to keep shooting 9mm, 'cause I'm still in college. Best of both worlds, I thought.

IN MY EXPERIENCE:
The trigger is freakin sweet. Better than Smiths'. Single or double action, no problem. I loved it.

Recoil is absolutely manageable. I remember searching this forum's archives for opinions before I bought it. Recoil reports were about half reassuring and half terrifying.
Apparently the 9mm gets about 95% of the performance of a .357 from this bbl length. So when I read some joker's post that the 905 "KICKED LIKE A MOTHERF*CKING MULE!!!!!" (yeah, that's how he said it), I was concerned.
Well, that's just plain not true. Recoil is not too much to handle. It just jumps. ;) It's a snub.

What ruined it for me was the cartridges. Moonclips were sometimes problematic and I started shooting without them, just ejecting with a pen at the range.

Well, from what I understand the 9mm is a tapered cartridge. Must be, because sometimes the rounds would seat OK, sometimes not. Then sometimes empties would just stick and not extract. I had misfires with and without the moonclips. It became too much.

Now, take this with a grain of salt, because I like to shoot cheap ammo. Heck that was the whole point of the 9mm wheel gun for me. Possibly could have worked better with better ammo (I'm sure it didn't help the couple times I shot that nasty laquered Wolf :rolleyes::eek:) Anyways, it just wasn't for me. Hope you have better luck. It sure was a sexy gun!
 
"TK Custom Moonclips" makes full clips for the five shot 9mm SP 101 which will probably fit other five round revos like the Taurus - they are GREAT clips...shells attached / detached from outter perimeter, not inner. Twelve pack is about $20 and worth every penny...TW<<

I have a 905 Stainless with no hammer spur. I tried the moon clips for the Smith, and they are the correct geometry with regard to the center star, and the chambers in the cylinder. Problem is that it is too thick, and the crane will not close with the clip in place. In fact, the thinness of the clips is actually the problem with them. They are a bit flimsy. Shooting rounds without the moon clip is no problem since the rounds headspace on the case mouth. However, with that said, I do find the Blazer aluminum rounds a little hard to extract when fired without the moon clip. Brass should be less so, since it is a little harder than the aluminum. One of the main reasons I like it so well is that I have only one ammunition to stock and maintain. I also have a Hi Power in 9mm.

My normal carry weapon is a Glock 19. I often carry the Glock in a belt holster with a Hawaiian shirt over it, and the Taurus in my pants pocket. When attire will not allow me to carry the Glock, I carry the Taurus only. I really love the little thing, but feel more secure with 16 rounds rather than 5. With that said, I would rather have 5 rounds than a rock.
 
I had a blue 905 DAO. It worked fine and even had a nice trigger. Recoil was pretty snappy but tolerable. The moon clips did not seem to hold the cartridges firmly. I never tested the clips by dropping or some such. I sold the 905 on my way to acquiring a 357 SP101. In retrospect, the 905 was probably more pleasant to shoot.

Tom
 
Welll....

I'm waiting for someone with the Ruger SP101 9mm to try its moonclips in the Taurus 905. Anyone? Probably won't work either... manufacturer's planned obsolesence I'll bet.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top