I'm strongly considering getting a Millenium Pro in 9mm, but am unsure about which finish to get. The stainless only costs about $10 more than the blue.
I really like the look of the blue finish much more than the stainless - I think it blends in well with the polymer frame. However, I know that stainless is much more durable, and does much better with corrosion. My question is, how much better is stainless? Is there that big of a difference between modern blue finishes and stainless? I have a Ruger Security Six that is over 30 years old, and the blue finish on it still looks good.
Also, any opinions on the titanium slide? I noticed that the gun is slightly wider and shorter (height is less) than the stainless or blued finishes. Seemed kind of odd to me. Is the titanium finish (which would be more durable than stainless or blue) worth the extra $70?
Thanks.
I really like the look of the blue finish much more than the stainless - I think it blends in well with the polymer frame. However, I know that stainless is much more durable, and does much better with corrosion. My question is, how much better is stainless? Is there that big of a difference between modern blue finishes and stainless? I have a Ruger Security Six that is over 30 years old, and the blue finish on it still looks good.
Also, any opinions on the titanium slide? I noticed that the gun is slightly wider and shorter (height is less) than the stainless or blued finishes. Seemed kind of odd to me. Is the titanium finish (which would be more durable than stainless or blue) worth the extra $70?
Thanks.