4D5
Member
Read this article today in the Nevada Appeal (Carson City, NV).
http://www.nevadaappeal.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20040921/NEWS/109210018
The article actually describes the whole incident without bias. However... I had a real hard time factoring in the "accident" I mean how the heck can putting a gun to your head and pulling the trigger be an accident? I thought the article deserved a call to the author. So I called and talked to her. I asked her how she factored in the "accident". Got some lame answers but she finally said it was an accident that the gun was loaded. I said and what was the putting gun to head and pulling trigger? silence.... I told her that every gun safety rule was broken, and where were the parents? I told her the article was ok but the title definately does not qualify as an "accident". Author said the definition of an accident is something unexpected. I said, oh... so that would be someting like playing with a rattle snake? silence... I pressed more, asked why she used "accident" in the title, well... the staff that come up with the titles wrote it. I said fine, let me talk to that person I really have an issue with "accident". One moment..... she comes back on the line(bluff didn't work), I ask, are you the person who wrote the title, no it's me again. So what's up with the title people, well they thought it was right for the article. Explain "accident" to me again. I said this is precisely why I left the PSRK to avoid "news" that gives fuel to the ultra liberals and punishes the 98% law abiding citizens with opressive gun laws. Her reply, well I was in the service, oh I was too and am a responsible gun owner. I asked her since she is familiar with firearms if she ever put a gun to her head and pulled the trigger thinking it might not accidently go off. Well no... neither have I nor has any other person I know. So what do you think about "accident" now... well maybe it shouldn't have been in the title... well I have to go now, ok fine...
http://www.nevadaappeal.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20040921/NEWS/109210018
The article actually describes the whole incident without bias. However... I had a real hard time factoring in the "accident" I mean how the heck can putting a gun to your head and pulling the trigger be an accident? I thought the article deserved a call to the author. So I called and talked to her. I asked her how she factored in the "accident". Got some lame answers but she finally said it was an accident that the gun was loaded. I said and what was the putting gun to head and pulling trigger? silence.... I told her that every gun safety rule was broken, and where were the parents? I told her the article was ok but the title definately does not qualify as an "accident". Author said the definition of an accident is something unexpected. I said, oh... so that would be someting like playing with a rattle snake? silence... I pressed more, asked why she used "accident" in the title, well... the staff that come up with the titles wrote it. I said fine, let me talk to that person I really have an issue with "accident". One moment..... she comes back on the line(bluff didn't work), I ask, are you the person who wrote the title, no it's me again. So what's up with the title people, well they thought it was right for the article. Explain "accident" to me again. I said this is precisely why I left the PSRK to avoid "news" that gives fuel to the ultra liberals and punishes the 98% law abiding citizens with opressive gun laws. Her reply, well I was in the service, oh I was too and am a responsible gun owner. I asked her since she is familiar with firearms if she ever put a gun to her head and pulled the trigger thinking it might not accidently go off. Well no... neither have I nor has any other person I know. So what do you think about "accident" now... well maybe it shouldn't have been in the title... well I have to go now, ok fine...
Last edited: