If you read the 2nd Amendment literally, it gives ONE reason for being included: "...militia being neccessary to the security of a free state, ..." It really does protect, expressly, the right of the people to bear arms in defense of freedom and security. Those, to my mind, are military -- combative -- purposes.
The 2nd really doesn't speak to hunting, target shooting, gun collecting, or other recreational persuits. Obviously it DOES NOT prohibit, forbid, or restrict them either. It just doesn't list them as foundational socially compelling reasons for protecting the right of the people to bear arms.
And in practice, if the 2nd applies to both a individual right, and a military purpose, then how do we view laws such as the 1934 NFA which places a restriction on weapons in common use by military. Or the ban on importing firearms that have no "Sporting Purpose" ?
I agree the 2nd does not speak to usage , it simply gives one reason as an example.
To highlight that reason in such a manner as to imply that is the only reason is what I suspect the edit is all about.