Quantcast

The Army's new Squad Automatic Rifle will be Chambered in .270 Win. ...ish.

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by Garandimal, Feb 1, 2019.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. MTMilitiaman

    MTMilitiaman Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2005
    Messages:
    3,170
    Location:
    Missoula, Montana
    I still think we should have gone with the .280 British back in the 1950s.
     
    SharpDog likes this.
  2. jmorris

    jmorris Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2005
    Messages:
    15,050
    They came out with the 270 Winchester 95 years ago, that’s got to count for something.

    Since 1923, it has become obvious that people don’t always want a black car nor do they like to hand crank them from the front though...
     
  3. SharpDog

    SharpDog Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2006
    Messages:
    2,200
    Location:
    Tennessee
    Yeah but you look like a NAVY plant, maybe to throw water all over the subject ... ;)
     
  4. SharpDog

    SharpDog Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2006
    Messages:
    2,200
    Location:
    Tennessee
    yeah but you would all have to hand carry those 1000 lb bombs to targets ;)
     
    adcoch1 likes this.
  5. Garandimal

    Garandimal Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2017
    Messages:
    1,748
    Location:
    Lee of Death Valley, ...where Tigers feed.
    An E-3 in every squad that can engage multiple targets with near 100% hit rate to 600 meters?

    What is THAT worth?




    GR
     
    Gordon likes this.
  6. Coal Dragger

    Coal Dragger Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2008
    Messages:
    2,239
    Location:
    Black Hills, SD
    Not much in reality.

    Afghanistan is an extreme outlier in fighting conditions and ranges to target. Plus the ROE’s are super restrictive making the use of company and battalion level mortar assets almost impossible to utilize.

    Fact is the vast majority of the world lives in more densely populated areas than Afghanistan, and most fights are likely to not be at 200+ meters.

    This is a fools errand and a waste of money. Figure out how to make a 60mm mortar lighter, more accurate, and easier to use. That will be more useful.
     
    alsaqr likes this.
  7. Garandimal

    Garandimal Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2017
    Messages:
    1,748
    Location:
    Lee of Death Valley, ...where Tigers feed.
    For one rifleman/squad?

    Extreme outlier... super restrictive... battalion level mortar assets almost impossible to utilize... are likely to not be... waste of money...


    Mortars, and not a precision rifle, in a densely populated environment?

    Disagree.




    GR
     
  8. Garandimal

    Garandimal Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2017
    Messages:
    1,748
    Location:
    Lee of Death Valley, ...where Tigers feed.
    And, what hasn't been mentioned yet, ttbomk, is that - this technology already exists - and there is a very real chance that out troops will be facing suppressed long range precision rifles in the future.

    Good to have a chair when the music stops.




    GR
     
    Varminterror likes this.
  9. Coal Dragger

    Coal Dragger Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2008
    Messages:
    2,239
    Location:
    Black Hills, SD
    Precision rifle capabilities are not important enough to burden the logistics system, and small units with a caliber addition. Burdening the individual soldier or Marine with a heavy, specialized long gun, that takes different ammo than the rest of the fire team or squad is a stupid self imposed handicap. It’s a dumb enough idea that the brass will inevitably love it, and some poor Lance Corporal is going to be lugging around 20lb pile of garbage that rarely if ever gets used.

    This is the kind of idiocy that happens when you have a bunch of Colonels and SNCO’s who’ve spent 15+ years fighting an insurgency (poorly I might add) with overly restrictive ROE’s in a very open rural area, with a force that cannot move quickly because their light infantry are so over burdened with kit. So all they know is we cannot move, and bad guys are far away, so we want to shoot stuff far away. So let’s change all our gear for the next fight, to address the problems we imposed on ourselves in the last one.

    This mindset is completely and fundamentally flawed.
     
    MTMilitiaman and alsaqr like this.
  10. Texas10mm

    Texas10mm Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2018
    Messages:
    3,456
    Location:
    Not DFW
    Big Army is always preparing to fight the last war.
     
    mpd61 likes this.
  11. mcb

    mcb Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2008
    Messages:
    3,387
    Location:
    North Alabama
    If you were prepared for the next war you probably could have avoided it.
     
    Demi-human and edwardware like this.
  12. theotherwaldo

    theotherwaldo Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2008
    Messages:
    3,847
    Location:
    In the Wild Horse Desert of Texas
    What happened to "Use the right tool for the job"?
    How many times has the M-14 been brought back from permanent retirement?
    Just because a weapon or tool has been issued to a unit doesn't mean that that tool or weapon must be carried by that unit in every situation.
     
  13. theotherwaldo

    theotherwaldo Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2008
    Messages:
    3,847
    Location:
    In the Wild Horse Desert of Texas
    -If you prepare for the typical battle in the average war then you have already lost.
     
  14. Robert

    Robert Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2006
    Messages:
    12,323
    Location:
    Texan by birth, in Colorado cause I hate humidity
    We seem to be off in the weeds on this one, let's call it a day.
     
    Gordon likes this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice